The shear layer development for a NACA 0025 airfoil at a low Reynolds number was investigated experimentally and numerically using large eddy simulation (LES). Two angles of attack (AOAs) were considered: 5 deg and 12 deg. Experiments and numerics confirm that two flow regimes are present. The first regime, present for an angle-of-attack of 5 deg, exhibits boundary layer reattachment with formation of a laminar separation bubble. The second regime consists of boundary layer separation without reattachment. Linear stability analysis (LSA) of mean velocity profiles is shown to provide adequate agreement between measured and computed growth rates. The stability equations exhibit significant sensitivity to variations in the base flow. This highlights that caution must be applied when experimental or computational uncertainties are present, particularly when performing comparisons. LSA suggests that the first regime is characterized by high frequency instabilities with low spatial growth, whereas the second regime experiences low frequency instabilities with more rapid growth. Spectral analysis confirms the dominance of a central frequency in the laminar separation region of the shear layer, and the importance of nonlinear interactions with harmonics in the transition process.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 2018
Research-Article
Shear Layer Development, Separation, and Stability Over a Low-Reynolds Number Airfoil
Paul Ziadé,
Paul Ziadé
Department of Mechanical
& Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Calgary,
Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
e-mail: paul.ziade@ucalgary.ca
& Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Calgary,
Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
e-mail: paul.ziade@ucalgary.ca
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark A. Feero,
Mark A. Feero
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Michigan State University,
East Lansing, MI 48824
e-mail: m.feero@mail.utoronto.ca
Michigan State University,
East Lansing, MI 48824
e-mail: m.feero@mail.utoronto.ca
Search for other works by this author on:
Philippe Lavoie,
Philippe Lavoie
Institute for Aerospace Studies,
University of Toronto,
Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada
e-mail: lavoie@utias.utoronto.ca
University of Toronto,
Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada
e-mail: lavoie@utias.utoronto.ca
Search for other works by this author on:
Pierre E. Sullivan
Pierre E. Sullivan
Professor
Department of Mechanical
& Industrial Engineering,
University of Toronto,
Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
e-mail: sullivan@mie.utoronto.ca
Department of Mechanical
& Industrial Engineering,
University of Toronto,
Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
e-mail: sullivan@mie.utoronto.ca
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul Ziadé
Department of Mechanical
& Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Calgary,
Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
e-mail: paul.ziade@ucalgary.ca
& Manufacturing Engineering,
University of Calgary,
Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
e-mail: paul.ziade@ucalgary.ca
Mark A. Feero
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Michigan State University,
East Lansing, MI 48824
e-mail: m.feero@mail.utoronto.ca
Michigan State University,
East Lansing, MI 48824
e-mail: m.feero@mail.utoronto.ca
Philippe Lavoie
Institute for Aerospace Studies,
University of Toronto,
Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada
e-mail: lavoie@utias.utoronto.ca
University of Toronto,
Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada
e-mail: lavoie@utias.utoronto.ca
Pierre E. Sullivan
Professor
Department of Mechanical
& Industrial Engineering,
University of Toronto,
Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
e-mail: sullivan@mie.utoronto.ca
Department of Mechanical
& Industrial Engineering,
University of Toronto,
Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
e-mail: sullivan@mie.utoronto.ca
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received August 23, 2017; final manuscript received January 5, 2018; published online March 13, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Hui Hu.
J. Fluids Eng. Jul 2018, 140(7): 071201 (12 pages)
Published Online: March 13, 2018
Article history
Received:
August 23, 2017
Revised:
January 5, 2018
Citation
Ziadé, P., Feero, M. A., Lavoie, P., and Sullivan, P. E. (March 13, 2018). "Shear Layer Development, Separation, and Stability Over a Low-Reynolds Number Airfoil." ASME. J. Fluids Eng. July 2018; 140(7): 071201. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039233
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Prediction of Reynolds Number Effects on Low-Pressure Turbines Using a High-Order ILES Method
J. Turbomach (March,2020)
Features of a Laminar Separated Boundary Layer Near the Leading-Edge of a Model Airfoil for Different Angles of Attack: An Experimental Study
J. Fluids Eng (February,2017)
Passive Manipulation of Separation-Bubble Transition Using Surface Modifications
J. Fluids Eng (February,2009)
Toward Cost-Effective Boundary Layer Transition Computations With Large-Eddy Simulation
J. Fluids Eng (November,2018)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Cavitating Structures at Inception in Turbulent Shear Flow
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Large Eddy Simulation of a Collapsing Vapor Bubble Containing Non-Condensable Gas
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
An Investigation of Tip-Vortex Turbulence Structure using Large-Eddy Simulation
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)