Abstract

The cross-flow turbine has been utilizing to develop small hydropower less than about 500 kW in the world. The turbine cost is lower than the other turbines because of its smaller number of assembled parts and more straightforward structures. However, the maximum efficiency of the cross-flow turbine is lower than that of traditional turbines. Improving the turbine efficiency without increasing manufacturing costs is the best way to develop small hydropower in the future. This study is aiming to improve the turbine efficiency at the design point and partial load. The runner's outflow angle varies with turbine speed and guide vane opening (GVO) in the typical cross-flow turbine. The tangential velocity component remains in the outflow in these conditions; thus, a change in the outflow direction along the runner's radial direction is helpful for performance improvement. The authors experimentally change the desirable outflow angle by attaching a cavity and a guide wall at the outside casing tip. The turbine performance test was conducted for various turbine speeds and GVOs. Next, flow visualization around the runner was performed. As a result, both of cavity and guide wall improve the turbine performance. The outlet flow patterns are different by attaching the cavity and the guide wall, especially between the partial and optimum load conditions.

References

1.
Mockmore
,
C. A.
, and
Merryfield
,
F.
,
1949
, “
The Banki Water Turbine
,” Bulletin Series No. 25, Engineering Experiment Station, Oregon State System of Higher Education,
Oregon State College
,
Corvallis, OR
.
2.
Fukutomi
,
J.
,
Nakase
,
Y.
, and
Hasui
,
S.
,
1986
, “
A Study of a Cross-Flow Turbine (Effects of the Blade Number and Blade Exit Angle on the Turbine Performance)
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. Ser. B
,
52
(
473
), pp.
407
412
.10.1299/kikaib.52.407
3.
Young-Do
,
C.
,
Jae-Ik
,
L.
,
You-Teak
,
K.
, and
Young-Ho
,
L.
,
2008
, “
Effect of Blade Angle on the Performance of a Cross-Flow Hydro Turbine
,”
J. Korean Soc. Mar. Eng.
,
32
(
3
), pp.
413
420
.10.5916/jkosme.2008.32.3.413
4.
Yamabe
,
M.
,
Ito
,
S.
,
Okusawa
,
T.
, and
Takagi
,
Y.
,
1985
, “
Study on the Hydraulic Performance of Crossflow Turbine (First Report, the Turbine With an Aspect Ratio of 0.5)
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. Ser. B (Jpn)
,
51
(
472
), pp.
3928
3936
.10.1299/kikaib.51.3928
5.
Yamabe
,
M.
, and
Ito
,
S.
,
1986
, “
Study on the Hydraulic Performance of Cross-Flow Turbine (Second Report, the Turbine With an Aspect ratio of 2.0)
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. Ser. B (Japanese)
,
52
(
475
), pp.
1050
1059
.10.1299/kikaib.52.1050
6.
Desai
,
V. R.
, and
Aziz
,
N. M.
,
1994
, “
An Experimental Investigation of Cross-Flow Turbine Efficiency
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
116
(
3
), pp.
545
550
.10.1115/1.2910311
7.
Toyokura
,
T.
,
Kanemoto
,
T.
,
Suzuki
,
T.
, and
Sato
,
T.
,
1985
, “
Studies on Cross-Flow Water Turbines
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. Ser. B (Jpn)
,
51
(
461
), pp.
143
151
.10.1299/kikaib.51.143
8.
Young-Do
,
C.
, and
Sung-Woo
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Shape Effect of Inlet Nozzle and Draft Tube on the Performance and Internal Flow of Cross-Flow Hydro Turbine
,”
J. Korean Soc. Mar. Eng.
,
36
(
3
), pp.
351
357
.10.5916/jkosme.2012.36.3.351
9.
Toyokura
,
T.
,
Kanemoto
,
T.
,
Kitahora
,
T.
, and
Shiraishi
,
N.
,
1987
, “
Studies on Cross-Flow Water Turbines (Further Report, Application to Low Head)
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. Ser. B
,
53
(
491
), pp.
2078
2084
.10.1299/kikaib.53.2078
10.
Adhikari
,
R.
, and
Wood
,
D.
,
2018
, “
The Design of High Efficiency Crossflow Hydro Turbines: A Review and Extension
,”
Energies
,
11
(
2
), p.
267
.10.3390/en11020267
You do not currently have access to this content.