Abstract

The interpretation of mixed DNA stains is explained in the context of likelihood ratios. The probabilities for the mixed-stain profile are evaluated under alternative explanations that specify the numbers of contributors and the profiles of any known contributors. Interpretations based simply on the frequencies with which random members of a population would not be excluded from a mixed-stain profile do not make use of all the information, and may overstate the strength of the evidence against included people. The effects of the numbers of contributors depends on whether all the alleles at a locus are present in the mixed stain. A general equation is given to allow likelihood ratios to be calculated, and includes the “2p” modification suggested by the 1996 NRC report. This modification is not always conservative. A computer program to perform calculations is available.

References

1.
Aitken
C GG
.
Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists
.
New York
,
Wiley
,
1995
.
2.
Balding
D J
,
Nichols
R A
.
DNA profile match probability calculation: How to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands
.
Forensic Sci Int
1994
;
64
:
125
-
40
.
3.
Chakraborty
R
,
Zhong
Y
,
Jin
L
,
Budowle
B
.
Nondetectability of restriction fragment sizes within and between loci in RFLP typing of DNA
.
Am J Human Genet
1994
;
55
:
391
-
401
.
4.
Evett
I W
.
What is the probability that this blood came from that person? A meaningful question?
J Forensic Sci
1983
;
23
:35.
5.
Evett
I W
,
Buffery
C
,
Wilcott
G
,
Stoney
D
.
A guide to interpreting single locus profiles of DNA mixtures in forensic case
.
J Forensic Sci Soc
1991
;
31
:
41
-
7
.
6.
Gill
P
,
Jeffreys
A J
,
Werrett
D J
.
Forensic application of DNA ‘finger-prints
.”
Nature
 0028-0836
1985
;
318
:
577
-
79
.
7.
Lindley
D V
.
A problem in forensic science
.
Biometrika
 0006-3444
1977
;
64
:
207
-
13
.
8.
National Research Council
.
DNA technology in forensic science
.
Washington, DC
,
National Academy Press
,
1992
.
9.
National Research Council
.
The evaluation of forensic DNA evidence
.
Washington, DC
,
National Academy Press
,
1996
.
10.
Walker
R H
,
Duquesnoy
R J
,
Jennings
E R
,
Krause
H D
,
Lee
C L
,
Polesky
H
, editors.
Inclusion probabilities in parentage testing
.
Arlington, VA
,
American Association of Blood Banks
,
1983
.
11.
Weir
B S
.
The effects of inbreeding on forensic calculations
.
Ann Rev Genet
1994
;
28
:
597
-
621
.
12.
Hall
M
.
Combinatorial Theory
.
New York
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
1967
.
13.
Weir
B S
,
Triggs
C M
,
Starling
L
,
Stowell
L I
,
Walsh
K AJ
,
Buckleton
J
.
Interpreting DNA mixtures
.
J Forensic Sci
1997
;
42
(
2
):
213
-
222
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.