Abstract

With increasing commercial use of video surveillance to deter crime, physical anthropologists are becoming more involved in the forensic identification of persons based on photographic evidence. Three contrasting case studies from southern Florida are presented that illustrate the utilization of conventional anthropometry in determining the identity of suspects. In each case an arrested suspect and a subject videotaped during the commission of a crime are compared with respect to a series of discrete craniofacial and post-cranial proportions. Each case analysis is supplemented by additional data on earlobe structure, head and facial hair patterns, degree of chin eminence, presence or absence of tattoos, and various aspects of bodily dimensions and physique including height and weight estimations.

References

1.
Curriden
M
.
Crime scene videos (used as evidence in criminal trials)
.
Legal Med Annual
1991
;
25
-
44
.
2.
Surette
R
.
Video street patrol: media technology and street crime
.
J Police Sci Admin
1985
;
13
:
78
-
85
.
3.
Ferrario
V
,
Miani
A
,
Tartalia
G
.
Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations
.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1993
;
103
:
327
-
37
.
4.
İşcan
M Y
.
Craniofacial image analysis and reconstruction
. In:
İşcan
M
,
Helmer
R
, editors.
Forensic analysis of the skull
.
New York
,
Wiley-Liss
,
1993
;
1
-
9
.
5.
Troy
D
.
Video surveillance—big brother may be watching you
.
Ariz State Law J
1989
;
21
:
445
-
63
.
6.
Granholm
J M
.
Video surveillance on public streets: the constitutionality of invisible citizen searches
.
Univ of Detroit Law Rev
1987
;
64
:
687
-
713
.
7.
Vilensky
R
.
The discoverability of surveillance photographs
.
New York State Bar J
1990
;
62
:
36
-
9
.
8.
Giacoppo
M
.
The expanding role of videotape in court
.
FBI Law Enforcement Bull
1991
;
60
:
1
-
6
.
9.
Fraser
P G
.
Admissibility of photographic film and videotape evidence
.
The Advocate
1992
;
50
:
19
-
32
.
10.
Callahan
P K
.
Evidence—pretrial photographic identification of criminal suspects
.
Oregon Law Rev
1981
;
60
:
443
-
57
.
11.
Goldstein
E
.
Using videotape to present evidence in criminal proceedings
.
Criminal Law Quart
1985
;
27
:
369
-
84
.
12.
May
R
.
Admissibility of photographic and videotape evidence
.
J Criminal Law
1987
;
51
:
437
-
43
.
13.
Maxwell
C
.
Evidential value of identification by photograph
.
Law Soc J
1987
;
25
:
30
-
35
.
14.
Madison
B V
.
Seeing can be deceiving: photographic evidence in a visual age—how much weight does it deserve?
William and Mary Law Rev
1984
;
25
:
705
-
42
.
15.
Guilshan
C
.
A picture is worth a thousand lies: electronic imaging and the future of the admissibility of photographs into evidence
.
Rutgers Computer and Technology Law J
1992
;
365
-
80
.
16.
Cawley
M T
.
North Carolina's “test for excess”: the prejudicial use of photographic evidence in criminal prosecutions after State v. Hennis
.
North Carolina Law Rev
1989
;
67
:
1367
-
84
.
17.
Farkas
L G
.
Anthropometry of the head and face
, 2nd ed.
New York
,
Raven Press
,
1994
.
18.
Farkas
L G
,
Munro
I R
.
Anthropometric facial proportions in medicine
.
Springfield, IL
,
Charles C Thomas
,
1987
.
19.
Hall
J G
,
Froster-Iskenius
U G
,
Allanson
J E
.
Handbook of normal physical measurements
.
New York
,
Oxford University Press
,
1989
.
20.
Kolar
J C
,
Salter
E M
.
Craniofacial anthropometry
.
Springfield, IL
,
Charles C Thomas
,
1997
.
21.
Lohman
T G
,
Roche
A F
,
Martorell
R
.
Anthropometric standardization reference manual
.
Springfield, IL
,
Human Kinetics Books
,
1991
.
22.
France
D L
,
Horn
A
.
Lab manual and workbook for physical anthropology
, 2nd ed.
St. Paul, MN
,
West Publishing Co.
,
1992
.
23.
Wolfe
L D
,
Lieberman
L S
,
Hutchinson
D L
.
Laboratory textbook for physical anthropology
, 4th ed.
Raleigh, NC
,
Contemporary Publishing Co.
,
1994
.
24.
İşcan
M Y
.
Introduction of techniques for photographic comparison: potential and problems
. In:
İşcan
M
,
Helmer
R
, editors.
Forensic analysis of the skull
.
New York
,
Wiley-Liss
,
1993
;
57
-
70
.
25.
Weinberg
G H
,
Schumaker
J A
.
Statistics: an intuitive approach
, 4th ed.
Pacific Grove, CA
,
Brooks-Cole
,
1981
.
26.
Siegal
S
,
Castellano
N
.
Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
, 2nd ed.
New York
,
McGraw-Hill
,
1988
.
27.
Attallah
N L
,
Marshall
W A
.
The estimation of stature from anthropometric and photographic measurements of the limbs
.
Med Sci Law
1986
;
26
:
225
-
35
.
28.
Maat
G JR
.
The positioning and magnification of faces and skulls for photographic superimposition
.
Forensic Sci Int
1989
;
41
:
225
-
35
.
29.
Wright
F D
,
Golden
G S
.
Forensic photography
. In:
Stimson
P
,
Mertz
C
, editors.
Forensic dentistry
.
Boca Raton, FL
,
CRC Press
,
1997
;
101
-
36
.
30.
Duckworth
J E
.
Forensic photography
.
Springfield, IL
,
CC Thomas
,
1983
.
31.
Pigott
M A
,
Brigham
J C
,
Bothwell
R K
.
A field study on the relationship between quality of eyewitness' descriptions and indentification accuracy
.
J Police Sci Admin
1990
;
17
:
84
-
8
.
32.
Green
D
,
Geiselman
R
.
Building composite facial images: effects of feature saliency and delay of construction
.
J Appl Psychol
1989
;
74
:
714
-
22
.
33.
Joseph
G P
.
Modern visual evidence
. 2nd ed.
New York
,
Law Journals Seminars Press
,
1994
.
34.
Jungers
W
,
Falsetti
A
,
Wall
C
.
Shape, relative size, and size adjustments in morphometrics
.
Yrbk Phys Anthrop
1995
;
38
:
137
-
61
.
35.
Penev
P S
,
Atick
,
J J
.
Local feature analysis: a general statistical theory for object representation
.
Network Computation in Neural Systems
1996
;
7
:
477
-
500
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.