How the Probability of a False Positive Affects the Value of DNA Evidence

2.

Thompson

WC

,

Ford

S

.

The meaning of a match: sources of ambiguity in the interpretation of DNA prints

. In:

Farley

M

,

Harrington

J

, editors.

Forensic DNA technology

.

New York

:

CRC Press, Inc

,

1991

;

93

–

152

.

3.

Thompson

WC

.

Subjective interpretation, laboratory error and the value of forensic DNA evidence: three case studies

.

Genetica

0016-6707

1995

;

96

:

153

–

68

.

4.

Taroni

F

,

Aitken

CGG

.

Forensic science at trial

.

Jurimetrics

1997

;

37

:

327

–

37

.

5.

Kaye

DH

,

Sensabaugh

GF

.

Reference guide on DNA evidence

. In:

Cecil

J

, editor.

Reference manual on scientific evidence

.

Washington, DC

:

Federal Judicial Center

,

2000

;

2

:

485

–

576

.

6.

Thompson

WC

.

Forensic DNA evidence

. In:

Black

B

,

Lee

P

, editors.

Expert evidence: a practitioner's guide to law, science and the FJC manual

.

St. Paul, MN

:

West Group

,

1997

;

195

–

266

.

7.

Jerome Smith v. State

. Southern Reporter,

Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals

,

1995

;

677

:

1240

–

48

.

8.

Koehler

JJ

.

Error and exaggeration in the presentation of DNA evidence

.

Jurimetrics

1993

;

34

:

21

–

39

.

9.

Kaye

D

.

DNA evidence: probability, population genetics, and the courts

.

Harv J Law Technol

1993

;

7

:

101

–

72

.

10.

Jonakait

RN

.

Stories, forensic science and improved verdicts

.

Cardozo L Rev

1991

;

13

:

343

–

52

.

11.

Koehler

JJ

.

DNA matches and statistics: important questions, surprising answers

.

Judicature

1993

;

76

:

222

–

9

.

12.

Thompson

WC

.

Comment

. In

Roeder

K

,

DNA fingerprinting: a review of the controversy

.

Stat Sci

0883-4237

1994

;

9

:

263

–

6

.

13.

Koehler

JJ

.

The random match probability in DNA evidence: irrelevant and prejudicial?

Jurimetrics

1995

;

35

:

201

–

19

.

14.

Thompson

WC

.

Accepting lower standards

:

The National Research Council's

second report on

forensic DNA evidence

.

Jurimetrics

1997

;

37

(

4

):

405

–

24

.

15.

Mueller

L

.

The use of DNA typing in forensic science

.

Acct in Res

1993

;

3

:

1

–

13

.

16.

Roeder

K

.

DNA fingerprinting: a review of the controversy

.

Stat Sci

0883-4237

1994

;

9

:

222

–

47

.

17.

Check

B

,

Neufeld

P

,

Dwyer

F

.

Actual innocence

.

New York

:

Doubleday

,

2000

.

18.

Brenner

L

,

Pfleeger

B

.

Investigation of the sexual assault of Danah H

. Philadelphia, PA:

Philadelphia Police Department DNA Identification Laboratory

; 1999 Sept. 24; Lab No.: 97-70826.

19.

Brenner

L

,

Pfleeger

B

. Amended report:

investigation of the sexual assault of Danah H

. Philadelphia, PA:

Philadelphia Police Department DNA Identification Laboratory

; 2000 Feb. 7; Lab No.: 97-70826.

20.

Cotton

RW

,

Word

C

.

Amended report of laboratory examination

. Germantown, MD:

Cellmark Diagnostics

;

20

11

1995

; Case No.: F951078.

21.

Schneider

PM

,

Fimmers

R

,

Woodroffe

S

,

Werrett

DJ

,

Bar

W

,

Brinkmann

B

, et al.

Report of a European collaborative exercise comparing DNA typing results using a single locus VNTR probe

.

Forensic Sci Intl

0363-468X

1991

;

49

:

1

–

15

.

22.

Gill

P

,

Woodroffe

S

,

Bar

W

,

Brinkmann

B

,

Carracedo

A

,

Eriksen

B

, et al.

A report of an international collaborative experiment to demonstrate the uniformity obtainable using DNA profiling techniques

.

Forensic Sci Intl

0363-468X

1992

;

53

:

29

–

43

.

23.

Gill

P

,

Kimpton

C

,

D'Aloja

E

,

Anderson

JF

,

Bar

W

,

Brinkmann

B

, et al.

Report of the European profiling group (EDNAP): Towards standardisation of short tandem repeat (STR) loci

.

Forensic Sci Intl

0363-468X

1994

;

65

:

51

–

9

.

24.

Kimpton

C

,

Gill

P

,

D'Aloja

E

,

Anderson

JF

,

Bar

W

,

Holgersson

S

, et al.

Report on the second collaborative STR exercise

.

Forensic Sci Intl

0363-468X

1995

;

71

:

137

–

52

.

25.

Wiegand

P

,

Amgach

E

,

Augustin

C

,

Bratzke

H

,

Cremer

U

,

Edelman

J

, et al.

GEDNAP IV and V

.

The 4th and 5th stain blind trials using DNA technology

.

Intl J Legal Med

0937-9827

1995

;

108

:

79

–

84

.

26.

Anderson

JF

,

Martin

P

,

Carracedo

A

,

Dobosz

M

,

Eriksen

B

,

Johnsson

V

, et al.

Report on the third EDNAP collaborative STR exercise

.

Forensic Sci Int

0363-468X

1996

;

78

:

83

–

93

.

27.

Technical Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (TWGDAM)

.

Established guidelines for a quality assurance program for DNA testing laboratories; including RFLP and PCR technologies

.

Crime Lab Dig

1995

;

18

:

44

–

75

.

28.

National Research Council

.

The evaluation of forensic DNA evidence

.

Washington, DC

:

National Academy Press

,

1996

.

29.

Balding

DJ

.

Errors and misunderstandings in the second NRC report

.

Jurimetrics

1997

;

37

:

469

–

76

.

30.

Thompson

WC

.

DNA evidence in the O.J. Simpson trial

.

U Colorado L Rev

1996

;

67

(

4

):

827

–

57

.

31.

People v. Venegas

: California Reporter,

California Supreme Court

,

1998

;

18

:

47

–

88

.

32.

Aitken

CGG

.

Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists

.

Chichester

:

J. Wiley & Sons

,

1995

.

33.

Schum

DA

.

Evidential foundations of probabilistic reasoning

.

New York

:

John Wiley & Sons

,

1994

.

34.

Robertson

B

,

Vignaux

GA

.

Interpreting evidence

.

Evaluating forensic science in the courtroom

.

Chichester

:

J. Wiley & Sons

,

1995

.

35.

Lempert

RO

.

Modeling relevance

.

Michigan L Rev

1975

;

75

:

1021

–

101

.

36.

Friedman

RD

.

Answering the bayesioskeptical challenge

.

Intl J Evid Proof

1997

;

1

:

276

–

8

.

37.

Ceci

SJ

,

Friedman

RD

.

The suggestibility of children: scientific research and legal implications

.

Cornell L Rev

2000

;

86

(

1

):

33

–

108

.

38.

Schlup v. Delo

: United States Reports,

U.S. Supreme Court

,

1995

;

513

:

298

–

322

.

39.

Thompson

WC

,

Schumann

EL

.

Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: the prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy

.

Law Hum Behav

0147-7307

1987

;

11

:

167

–

87

.

40.

Donnelly

P

,

Friedman

RD

.

DNA database searches and the legal consumption of scientific evidence

.

Michigan L Rev

1999

;

97

:

931

–

84

.

41.

Balding

DJ

,

Donnelly

P

.

Evaluating DNA profile evidence when the suspect is identified through a database search

.

J Forensic Sci

0022-1198

1996

;

41

(

4

):

603

–

7

.