Gas turbines fueled by integrated biomass gasifiers are a promising option for base-load electricity generation from a renewable resource. Aeroderivative turbines, which are characterized by high efficiencies in small units, are of special interest because transportation costs for biomass constrain conversion facilities to relatively modest scales. Part A of this two-part paper reviewed commercial development activities and major technological issues associated with biomass integrated-gasifier/gas turbine (BIG/GT) combined cycle power generation. Based on the computational model also described in Part A, this paper (Part B) presents results of detailed design-point performance calculations for several BIG/GT combined cycle configurations. Emphasis is given to systems now being proposed for commercial installation in the 25–30 MWe, power output range. Three different gasifier designs are considered: air-blown, pressurized fluidized-bed gasification; air-blown, near-atmospheric pressure fluidized-bed gasification; and near-atmospheric pressure, indirectly heated fluidized-bed gasification. Advanced combined cycle configurations (including with intercooling) with outputs from 22 to 75 MW are also explored. An economic assessment is also presented, based on preliminary capital cost estimates for BIG/GT combined cycles and expected biomass costs in several regions of the world.

Issue Section:
Gas Turbines: Coal, Biomass, and Alternative Fuels
Topics:
Biomass, Combined cycles, Economic analysis, Gas turbines, Fluidized beds, Fuel gasification, Pressure, Design, Electric power generation, Energy generation, Project cost estimation, Stress, Transportation systems, Turbines
1.
Anon., 1991, “Low Cost ‘Air Bottoming Cycle’ for Gas Turbines,” Gas Turbine World, May–June, p. 61.
2.
Battelle, 1993, “Operation and Evaluation of an Indirectly Heated Biomass Gasifier,” report to National Renewable Energy Laboratory from Battelle Columbus Laboratory, Columbus, OH.
3.
Bioflow, 1994a, “Pressurized Gasifier,” informational literature, Varkaus, Finland, received Feb.
4.
Bioflow, 1994b, “The New Generation of Biomass Power Plants,” informational literature, Varkaus, Finland, received Feb.
5.
Blackadder, W. H., Lundberg, H., Rensfelt, E., and Waldheim, L., 1994, “Heat and Power Production Via Gasification in the Range 5–50 MWe,” Advances in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion, by A. V. Bridgwater, ed., Blackie Academic & Professional, London, pp. 449–75.
6.
Brascep Engenharia, 1992, CHESF, Cientec, CVRD, Eletrobras, Shell Brazil, Shell International Petroleum Company, “Brazilian Biomass Power Generation: Phase I Final Report to the Global Environment Facility,” Mar.
7.
Breault, R., and Morgan, D., 1992, “Design and Economics of Electricity Production From an Indirectly-Heated Biomass Gasifier,” for Battelle Memorial Institute (Columbus, OH) by Tecogen, Inc., Waltham, MA, Oct. 22.
8.
Carpentieri
A. E.
,
Larson
E. D.
, and
Woods
J.
,
1993
, “
Future Biomass-Based Electricity Supply in Northeast Brazil
,”
Biomass and Bioenergy
, Vol.
4
(
3
), pp.
149
–
73
.
9.
Cohn, A., Hay, G. A., and Hollenbacher, R. H., 1993, “The Collaborative Advanced Gas Turbine Program—a Phase I Project Status Report,” Proc. 12th EPRI Gasification Conference, San Francisco, Oct. 27–29.
10.
Corman, J. C., 1986, “System Analysis of Simplified IGCC Plants,” prepared for the US Dept. of Energy by General Electric Company, Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, NY.
11.
Dawkins, R. P., et al., 1985, “Cost Growth and Performance of Kellog-Rust-Westinghouse-Gasification Combined Cycle Plants,” AP-4018, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
12.
Day, W. H., 1992, Turbo Power & Marine Systems, Connecticut, personal communication.
13.
de Biasi, V., 1993, “Next Generation Gas Turbine Designs Taking Shape in ATS, CAGT Programs,” Gas Turbine World, Nov.–Dec., pp. 14–20.
14.
EIA (Energy Information Administration), 1994, “Annual Energy Outlook 1994,” DOE/EIA-0383(94), US Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC, Jan.
15.
EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute), 1989, “TAG, Technical Assessment Guide: Electricity Supply 1989,” EPRI P-6587-L, Palo Alto, CA, Sept.
16.
Elliott, T. P., and Booth, R., 1990, “Sustainable Biomass Energy,” Selected Paper, Shell International Petroleum Company, London, Dec.
17.
Elliott, T. P., and Booth, R., 1993, “Brazilian Biomass Power Demonstration Project,” Special Project Brief, Shell International Petroleum Company, London, Sept.
18.
Fluor Daniel, Inc., 1993a, “Evaluation of Advanced Gas Turbine Cycles,” Gas Research Institute, Chicago.
19.
Fluor Daniel, Inc., United Technologies, and Texaco, Inc., 1993b, “A Feasibility and Assessment Study for FT4000 Humid Air Turbine (HAT),” TR-102156, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
20.
Huotari, J., Helynen, S., and Flyktman, M., 1993, “Indirect Biofixation of CO2,” CRE/CON 1424, Combustion and Thermal Engineering Laboratory, Tech. Research Center (VTT) of Finland, Jyvaskyla, Finland, Sept.
21.
Lundberg, H., 1992, TPS, Stockholm, Sweden, personal communication, Sept.
22.
Macchi, E., Consonni, S., Lozza, G., and Chiesa, P., 1994, “An Assessment of the Thermodynamic Performance of Mixed Gas-Steam Cycles, Part A: Intercooled and Steam-Injected Cycles,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-XXX.
23.
Miles, T. R., and Miles, T.R., Jr., 1988, “Reliable Feed Systems for Thermochemical Conversion,” Research in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion, Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp. 1156–1169.
24.
Paisley, M., 1994, Battelle Columbus Laboratory, personal communication, Columbus, OH, Jan.
25.
Palmer, C. A., and Erbes, M. R., 1993, “LM2500 Fired on Low Btu Fuels,” Final report prepared by Enter Software for the Technical Research Center of Finland (Epsoo, Finland), Jan. 28th.
26.
Perlack, R. D., and Wright, L. L., 1993, “Economics of Feedstock Supply,” draft, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, Nov. 18.
27.
Puhakka, M., 1994, General Manager, Bioflow Ltd., Varkhaus, Finland, personal communication, Feb.
28.
Schombacker, H., 1993, “Modelization of Coal Gasification Processes for Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Performance Prediction,” Diplomthesis; Braunschweigh Technical University (Germany)/Politecnico di Milano (Italy).
29.
Skog, E., 1993, Project Mgr., Varnamo Demonstration Program, Sydkraft Konsult, personal communication, Malmo, Sweden, Dec.
30.
Solar Thermal and Biomass Power Division, 1992, “Electricity From Biomass: a Development Strategy,” Office of Solar Energy Conversion, US Department of Energy, DOE/CH10093-152, Washington, DC, Apr.
31.
Theodore, L., and Buonicore, A., 1988, Air Pollution Control Equipment: Vol. I, Particulates, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
32.
Tittle, L. B., Van Laar, J. A., and Cohn, A., 1993, “Advanced Aeroderivative Gas Turbines: A Preliminary Study,” Proc. 12th EPRI Gasification Conference, ibid.
33.
Williams, R. H., and Larson, E. D., 1989, “Expanding Roles for Gas Turbines in Power Generation,” in: Electricity: Efficient End Use and New Generation Technologies and Their Planning Implications, by T. B. Johansson, B. Bodlund, and R. H. Williams, eds., Lund University Press, Lund, Sweden, pp. 503–553.
34.
Williams, R. H., and Larson, E. D., 1993, “Advanced Gasification-Based Biomass Power Generation,” in: Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels and Electricity, T. B. Johansson, H. Kelly, A. K. N. Reddy, and R. H. Williams, eds., Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 729–85.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1996
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.