The definition of open cycle rational efficiency is unequivocally based on the ratio of the actual shaft work output from a power plant to the maximum work that could be obtained in a reversible process between prescribed inlet and outlet states. However, different constraints may be applied to such an ideal reversible process, and the maximum work obtainable will then vary, as will the value of the rational efficiency. Attention has been drawn to this issue before in the literature and it is discussed further here. In particular, the consequences of defining the outlet state for the ideal process are critical. A further complication occurs when water or steam is injected into a gas turbine plant. Three definitions of rational efficiency are discussed here and some illustrative calculations presented. There are small but significant differences between the values of the three derived efficiencies. [S0742-4795(00)00101-0]

Issue Section:
Gas Turbines: Advanced Energy Systems
Keywords:
power plants, performance evaluation, fuel, combustion, gas turbine power stations
Topics:
Cycles, Exergy, Exhaust systems, Fuels, Gas turbines, Power stations, Pressure, Temperature, Water, Combustion, Exergy analysis, Fossil fuel power station, Steam
1.
Kotas, T. J., 1985, The Exergy Method of Thermal Power Analysis, Butterworth.
2.
Szargut, J., Morris, D. R., Stewart, F. R., 1988, Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical and Metallurgical Processes, Hemisphere, PA.
3.
Moran, M. J., 1989, Availability Analysis: A Guide to Efficient Energy Use, ASME Press, New York.
4.
Obert, E. F., 1960, Concepts of Thermodynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
5.
Haywood, R. W., 1980, Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Wiley, New York.
6.
Gyftopoulos, E. P., and Beretta, G. P., 1991, “Thermodynamics, Foundations and Applications,” MacMillan, New York.
7.
Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G., and Moran, A., 1996, Thermal Design and Optimization, Wiley, New York.
8.
Szargut, J., and Petela, R., 1965, Egzergia (in Polish), Naukowa-Technicze, Warsaw.
9.
Stodola, A., 1924, Steam and Gas Turbines, Springer, Berlin.
10.
Haywood, R. W., 1991, Analysis of Engineering Cycles, Pergamon, New York.
11.
Macchi
,
E.
,
Consonni
,
S.
,
Lozza
,
G.
, and
Chiesa
,
P.
,
1995
, “
An Assessment of the Thermodynamic Performance of Mixed Gas-Steam Cycles, Parts A and B
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
117
, pp.
489
–
508
.
12.
Horlock, J. H., 1992, Combined Power Plants, Pergamon, New York.
13.
Carcasci
,
C.
, and
Facchini
,
B.
,
1996
, “
A Numerical Method for Power Plant Simulation
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
118
, pp.
36
–
43
.
14.
Bettagli, N., and Manfrida, G., 1995, “Power Generation Using Liquid Hydrogen Fuel: A Possible Power Plant Scheme,” Hypothesis 1. Int. Conf., Gaeta, Italy.
15.
Stecco, S. S., and Manfrida, G., 1988, “Exergy Analysis of a Reactive Hydrogen-Oxygen Steam Cycle for Peak-Load Power Generation,” Proceedings, 23rd Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conf., ASME, Paper 88-93-54.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.