Honeycomb seals are frequently used as replacements for labyrinth seals in high-pressure centrifugal compressors to enhance rotordynamic stability. A concern exists that this enhanced stability will be lost if the honeycomb cavities become clogged. Static and dynamic tests were conducted on a honeycomb and a smooth seal (representing the honeycomb seal with completely clogged cells) at the same constant clearances using air with a supply pressure of 70 bars. The test matrix included three speeds, three pressure ratios, and three inlet preswirl conditions. The results show increased leakage, decreased synchronous stiffness, and decreased dynamic stability for the smooth seal with preswirled flow. The results strongly support the use of swirl brakes at the entrance of a honeycomb seal if clogging is a concern. Comparisons between test results and predictions from a two-control-volume theory by Kleynhans and Childs showed excellent agreement in general.

1.
Childs
,
D.
, and
Moyer
,
D.
, 1985, “
Vibration Characteristics of the HPOTP (High Pressure Oxygen Turbopump) of the SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engine)
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
107
(
1
), pp.
152
159
.
2.
Zeidan
,
F.
,
Perez
,
R.
, and
Stephenson
,
E.
, 1993, “
The Use of Honeycomb Seals in Stabilizing Two Centrifugal Compressors
,”
Proceedings of the 22nd Turbomachinery Symposium
, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, September 14-16,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
3
15
.
3.
Kleynhans
,
G.
, and
Childs
,
D.
, 1997, “
The Acoustic Influence of Cell Depth on the Rotordynamic Characteristics of Smooth Rotor/Honeycomb Stator Annular Gas Seals
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
119
, pp.
949
957
.
4.
Ha
,
T.-W.
, and
Childs
,
D.
, 1994, “
Annular Honeycomb-Stator Turbulent Gas Seal Analysis Using A New Friction-Factor Model Based on Flat Plate Tests
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
116
, pp.
352
360
.
5.
Dawson
,
M.
,
Childs
,
D.
,
Holt
,
C.
, and
Phillips
,
S.
, 2002, “
Theory Versus Experiments for the Dynamic Impedances of Annular Gas Seals: Part 2—Smooth and Honeycomb Seals
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
124
, pp.
963
970
.
6.
Dawson
,
M.
,
Childs
,
D.
,
Holt
,
C.
, and
Phillips
,
S.
, 2002, “
Theory Versus Experiments for the Dynamic Impedances of Annular Gas Seals: Part 1—Test Facility and Apparatus
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
124
, pp.
958
963
.
7.
Ha
,
T.
, and
Childs
,
D.
, 1992, “
Friction-Factor Data for Flat-Plate Tests of Smooth and Honeycomb Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
114
, pp.
722
729
.
8.
D’Souza
,
R.
, and
Childs
,
D.
, 2002, “
A Comparison of Rotordynamic-Coefficient Predictions of Annular Honeycomb Gas Seals Using Different Friction-Factor Models
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
124
, pp.
524
529
.
9.
Moore
,
J.
, and
Soulas
,
T.
, 2003, “
Damper Seal Comparison in a High-Pressure Re-Injection Centrifugal Compressor During Full-Load, Full-Pressure Factory Testing, Using Direct Rotordynamic Stability Measurement
,” Paper No. DETC2003/Vib-48458.
You do not currently have access to this content.