Simplicity, low cost, and easy replacement make labyrinth seals the primary seal type in gas turbines. However, excessive leakage and potential for rotordynamic instability are well known issues. Brush seals effectively control leakage in air breathing engines, albeit only applied for relatively low pressure differentials. Hybrid brush seals (HBSs) are an alternative to resolve poor reliability resulting from bristle tip wear while also allowing for reverse rotation operation. The novel configuration incorporates pads contacting the shaft, which under rotor spinning lifts off due to the generation of a hydrodynamic pressure. The ensuing gas film prevents intermittent contact, thus lowering the operating temperature and thermal distortions and even eliminating bristle wear. The hybrid brush seal improves sealing, is more durable and reliable than conventional brush seals, and allows reverse shaft rotation without seal damage. This paper presents measurements of power loss and leakage in a HBS for increasing pressure differentials over a range of rotor speeds. The test HBS, Haynes-25 bristle pack (850bristlescm) and 45 deg lay angle, is 166.4 mm in diameter and integrates 20-arcuate pads connected with thin electrical-discharge machined webs (EDM-webs) to the seal casing. The webs are designed with low radial stiffness to allow for rotor excursions and high axial stiffness to avoid pad pitching motions resulting from high pressure differentials across the seal. Measured drag power at low rotor speeds (<11ms at 1300 rpm) decreases as the pressure differential across the seal increases. At a fixed rotor speed, a significant drop in drag torque (and drag power) ensues as the supply pressure increases, thus demonstrating that a gas film separates the rotor from the seal pads. Additionally, the operating temperature measured at the rotor/seal interface remains approximately constant (24°C) during tests with shaft rotation (power loss and drag torque measurements) under pressurized conditions, indicating that the rotor and seal pads are not in contact. Flow rate measurements at room temperature (25°C) show an improved sealing ability with a leakage reduction of about 36% when compared with a first generation shoed-brush seal. The HBS calculated effective clearance (50μm) is approximately 70% smaller than the radial clearance (180μm) of an ideal noncontacting seal with similar rotor diameter. Improved brush seal technology will increase the efficiency of gas turbines while also aiding to improve the engine stability and to reduce vibrations.

1.
Chupp
,
R. E.
,
Hendricks
,
R. C.
,
Lattime
,
S. B.
, and
Steinetz
,
B. M.
, 2006, “
Sealing in Turbomachinery
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
22
(
2
), pp.
313
349
.
2.
Benkert
,
H.
, and
Wachter
,
J.
, 1980, “
Flow Induced Spring Coefficients of Labyrinth Seals for Applications in Turbomachinery
,”
NASA
, Report No. CP2133.
3.
Childs
,
D.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
, 1997, “
Annular Gas Seals and Rotordynamics of Compressors and Turbines
,”
Proceedings of the 26th Turbomachinery Symposium
,
Houston, TX
, Sept. 16–18, pp.
201
220
.
4.
Ferguson
,
J. G.
, 1988, “
Brushes as High Performance Gas Turbine Seals
,” ASME Paper No. 88-GT-182.
5.
Chupp
,
R. E.
, and
Dowler
,
C. A.
, 1993, “
Performance Characteristics of Brush Seals for Limited Life Engines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
115
, pp.
390
396
.
6.
Conner
,
J. K.
, and
Childs
,
D.
, 1993, “
Rotordynamic Coefficient Test Results for a Four-Stage Brush Seal
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
9
(
3
), pp.
462
465
.
7.
Proctor
,
M. E.
, and
Delgado
,
I. R.
, 2004, “
Leakage and Power Loss Tests Results for Competing Turbine Engine Seals
,”
NASA
, Report No. TM-2004-213049.
8.
Dogu
,
Y.
, and
Aksit
,
M. F.
, 2005, “
Brush Seal Temperature Distribution Analysis
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-69120.
9.
Justak
,
J. F.
, 2002, “
Robust Hydrodynamic Brush Seal
,” U.S. Patent No. 6,428,009.
10.
Delgado
,
A.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
, 2005, “
Measurements of Leakage, Structural Stiffness and Energy Dissipation Parameters in a Shoed Brush Seal
,”
Sea Technol.
,
2005
(
12
), pp.
7
10
. 0093-3651
11.
Delgado
,
A.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Justak
,
J. F.
, 2004, “
Analysis of Performance and Rotordynamic Force Coefficients of Brush Seals With Reverse Rotation Ability
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53614.
12.
Justak
,
J. F.
, 2007, “
Hydrodynamic Brush Seal
,” U.S. Patent No. 7,182,345.
13.
Justak
,
J. F.
, and
Crudgington
,
P. F.
, 2006, “
Evaluation of a Film Riding Hybrid Seal
,” AIAA Paper No. 2006-4932.
You do not currently have access to this content.