In “multijet” common rail (CR) diesel injection systems, when two consecutive injection current pulses approach each other, a merging of the two injections into a single one can occur. Such an “injection fusion” causes an undesired excessive amount of injected fuel, worsening both fuel consumption and particulate emissions. In order to avoid this phenomenon, lower limits to the dwell-time values are introduced in the control unit maps by a conservatively overestimated threshold, which reduces the flexibility of multiple-injection management. The injection fusion occurrence is mainly related to the time delay between the electrical signal to the solenoid and the nozzle opening and closure. The dwell-time fusion threshold was found to strongly decrease particularly with the nozzle closure delay. A functional dependence of the nozzle opening and closure delays on the solenoid energizing time and nominal rail pressure was experimentally assessed, and the injection temporal duration was correlated to the energizing time and rail pressure. A multijet CR injection-system mathematical model that was previously developed, including thermodynamics of liquids, fluid dynamics, mechanics of subsystems, and electromagnetism equations, was applied to better understand the cause and effect relationships for nozzle opening and closure delays. In particular, numerical results on the time histories of delivery- and control-chamber pressures, pilot- and needle-valve lifts, and mass flow rates through Z and A holes were obtained and analyzed to highlight the dependence of nozzle opening and closure delays on injector geometric features, physical variables, and valve dynamics. The nozzle closure delay was shown to strongly depend on the needle dynamics. Parametric numerical tests were carried out to identify configurations useful for minimizing the nozzle closure delay. Based on the results of these tests, a modified version of a commercial electroinjector was built, so as to achieve effectively lower nozzle closure delays and very close sequential injections without any fusion between them.

1.
Park
,
C.
,
Kook
,
S.
, and
Bae
,
C.
, 2004, “
Effects of Multiple Injections in a HSDI Diesel Engine Equipped With Common Rail Injection System
,” SAE Paper No. 2004-01-0127.
2.
Pfahl
,
U.
,
Hirtler
,
W.
, and
Cartus
,
T.
, 2003, “
Passenger Car Investigations of NOx-Adsorber and DPF Combination to Fulfill Future Diesel Emission Limits
,” SAE Paper No. 2003-01-0043.
3.
Nehmer
,
D. A.
, and
Reitz
,
R. D.
, 1994, “
Measurement of the Effect of Injection Rate and Split Injections on Diesel Engine Soot and NOx Emissions
,” SAE Paper No. 940668.
4.
Pierpont
,
D. A.
,
Montgomery
,
D. T.
, and
Reitz
,
R. D.
, 1995, “
Reducing Particulate and NOx Using Multiple Injections and EGR in a D. I. Diesel
,” SAE Paper No. 950217.
5.
Chen
,
S. K.
, 2000, “
Simultaneous Reduction of NOx and Particulate Emissions by Using Multiple Injections in a Small Diesel Engine
,” SAE Paper No. 2000-01-3084.
6.
U.S. Department of Energy
, 2001, “
Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) Technology
,” a report to the U.S. Congress.
7.
Foster
,
D. E.
, and
Najt
,
P. M.
, 1983, “
Compression-Ignited Homogeneous Charge Combustion
,” SAE Paper No. 830264.
8.
Gray
,
A. W.
, and
Ryan
,
T. W.
, 1997, “
Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) of Diesel Fuel
,” SAE Paper No. 971676.
9.
Stanglmaier
,
R. H.
, and
Roberts
,
C. E.
, 1999, “
Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI): Benefits, Compromises, and Future Engine Applications
,” SAE Paper No. 1999-01-3682.
10.
Ando
,
H.
, and
Kuwahara
,
K.
, 2001, “
A Keynote on Future Combustion Engines
,” SAE Paper No. 2001-01-0248.
11.
Helmantel
,
A.
, and
Denbratt
,
I.
, 2004, “
HCCI Operation of a Passenger Car Common Rail DI Diesel Engine With Early Injection of Conventional Diesel Fuel
,” SAE Paper No. 2004-01-0935.
12.
Buchwald
,
R.
,
Brauer
,
M.
,
Blechstein
,
A.
,
Sommer
,
A.
, and
Kahrstedt
,
J.
, 2004, “
Adaption of Injection System Parameters to Homogeneous Diesel Combustion
,” SAE Paper No. 2004-01-0936.
13.
Su
,
W.
,
Zhang
,
X.
,
Lin
,
T.
,
Pei
,
Y.
, and
Zhao
,
H.
, 2004, “
Study of Pulse Spray, Heat Release, Emissions and Efficiencies in a Compound Diesel HCCI Combustion Engine
,”
ASME ICED Fall Conference
, Paper No. ICEF2004-927.
14.
Su
,
W.
,
Wang
,
H.
, and
Liu
,
B.
, 2005, “
Injection Model Modulation for HCCI Diesel Combustion
,” SAE Paper No. 2005-01-0117.
15.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Ferrari
,
A.
,
Manno
,
M.
, and
Spessa
,
E.
, 2005, “
Experimental Investigation of Dynamic Effects on Multiple-Injection Common Rail System Performance
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
130
(
3
), p.
032806
.
16.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Ferrari
,
A.
, and
Manno
,
M.
, 2005, “
Parametric Analysis of Layout Effects on Common Rail Multiple-Injections
,”
ASME ICED Fall Conference
, Paper No. ICEF2005-1288.
17.
Baratta
,
M.
,
Catania
,
A. E.
, and
Ferrari
,
A.
, 2006, “
Hydraulic Circuit Design Rules to Eliminate the Dependence of the Injected Fuel on Dwell Time in Multijet Common Rail Systems
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202, in press.
18.
Catania
A. E.
,
Ferrari
,
A.
,
Manno
,
M.
, and
Spessa
,
E.
, 2006, “
A Comprehensive Thermodynamic Approach to Acoustic Cavitation Simulation in High-Pressure Injection Systems by a Conservative Homogeneous Barotropic-Flow Model
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
128
(
2
), pp.
434
445
.
19.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Ferrari
,
A.
, and
Manno
,
M.
, 2005, “
Development and Application of a Complete Common-Rail Injection System Mathematical Model for Hydrodynamic Analysis and Diagnostics
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
130
(
6
), p.
062809
.
20.
Zielke
,
W.
, 1968, “
Frequency-Dependent Friction in Transient Pipe Flow
,”
ASME J. Basic Eng.
0021-9223,
90
, pp.
109
115
.
21.
Kagawa
,
T.
,
Lee
,
I. Y.
,
Kitagawa
,
A.
, and
Takenaka
,
T.
, 1983, “
High Speed and Accurate Computing Method of Frequency-Dependent Friction in Laminar Pipe Flow for Characteristics Method
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. B
0387-5016,
49
, pp.
2638
2644
.
22.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Ferrari
,
A.
, and
Spessa
,
E.
, 2008, “
Temperature Variations in the Simulation of High-Pressure Injection-System Transient Flows Under Cavitation
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
0017-9310,
51
, pp.
2090
2107
.
You do not currently have access to this content.