Different scenarios of small break loss of coolant accident for pressurized water reactors (PWRs) lead to the reflux-condenser mode in which steam enters the hot leg from the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) and condenses in the steam generator. A limitation of the condensate backflow toward the RPV by the steam flowing in counter current could affect the core cooling and must be prevented. The simulation of counter-current flow limitation conditions, which is dominated by 3D effects, requires the use of a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach. These numerical methods are not yet mature, so dedicated experimental data are needed for validation purposes. In order to investigate the two-phase flow behavior in a complex reactor-typical geometry and to supply suitable data for CFD code validation, the “hot leg model” was built at Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (FZD). This setup is devoted to optical measurement techniques, and therefore, a flat test-section design was chosen with a width of 50 mm. The test section outlines represent the hot leg of a German Konvoi PWR at a scale of 1:3 (i.e., 250 mm channel height). The test section is mounted between two separators, one simulating the RPV and the other is connected to the steam generator inlet chamber. The hot leg model is operated under pressure equilibrium in the pressure vessel of the TOPFLOW facility of FZD. The air/water experiments presented in this article focus on the flow structure observed in the region of the riser and of the steam generator inlet chamber at room temperature and pressures up to 3 bar. The performed high-speed observations show the evolution of the stratified interface and the distribution of the two-phase mixture (droplets and bubbles). The counter-current flow limitation was quantified using the variation in the water levels measured in the separators. A confrontation with the images indicates that the initiation of flooding coincides with the reversal of the flow in the horizontal part of the hot leg. Afterward, bigger waves are generated, which develop to slugs. Furthermore, the flooding points obtained from the experiments were compared with empirical correlations available in literature. A good overall agreement was obtained, while the zero penetration was found at lower values of the gaseous Wallis parameter compared with previous work. This deviation can be attributed to the rectangular cross section of the hot leg model.

1.
Zabaras
,
G. J.
, and
Dukler
,
A. E.
, 1988, “
Counter-Current Gas-Liquid Annular Flow, Including the Flooding State
,”
AIChE J.
0001-1541,
34
(
3
), pp.
389
396
.
2.
Deendarlianto
,
Ousaka
,
A.
,
Kariyasaki
,
A.
, and
Fukano
,
T.
, 2005, “
Investigation of Liquid Film Behaviour at the Onset of Flooding During Adiabatic Countercurrent Air-Water Two-Phase Flow in an Inclined Pipe
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
235
, pp.
2281
2294
. 0029-5493
3.
Siddiqui
,
H.
,
Banerjee
,
S.
, and
Ardron
,
K. H.
, 1986, “
Flooding in an Elbow Between a Vertical and a Horizontal or Near-Horizontal Pipe
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
12
, pp.
531
541
. 0301-9322
4.
Wongwises
,
S.
, 1996, “
Flooding in a Horizontal Pipe With Bend
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
22
, pp.
195
201
. 0301-9322
5.
Hihara
,
E.
,
Soejima
,
H.
, and
Saito
,
T.
, 1985, “
Slugging of Countercurrent Gas-Liquid Flow in a Horizontal Channel
,” Nippon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu (B)/
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. B
0387-5016,
51
, pp.
394
397
.
6.
Zapke
,
A.
, and
Kröger
,
D. G.
, 2000, “
Countercurrent Gas-Liquid Flow in Inclined and Vertical Ducts—I: Flow Patterns, Pressure Drop Characteristics and Flooding
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
0301-9322,
26
, pp.
1439
1455
.
7.
Wallis
,
G. B.
, 1969,
One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
8.
Hewitt
,
G. F.
, and
Wallis
,
G. B.
, 1966, “
Flooding and Associated Phenomena in Falling Film Flow in a Vertical Tube
,” UKAEA Report No. AERE R-4022.
9.
Celata
,
G. P.
,
Cumo
,
M.
,
Farello
,
G. E.
, and
Setaro
,
T.
, 1991, “
Hysteresis Effect in Flooding
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
17
, pp.
283
289
. 0301-9322
10.
Choi
,
K. Y.
, and
No
,
C. H.
, 1995, “
Experimental Studies of Flooding in Nearly Horizontal Pipes
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
0301-9322,
21
, pp.
419
436
.
11.
Wallis
,
G. B.
, 1961, “
Flooding Velocities for Air Water in Vertical Tubes
,” UKAEA Report No. AAEW-R 123.
12.
Richter
H. J.
,
Wallis
,
G. B.
,
Carter
,
K. H.
, and
Murphy
,
S. L.
, 1978, “
Deentrainment and Counter-current Air-Water Flow in a Model PWR Hot Leg
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report No. NRC-0193-9.
13.
Ardron
,
K. H.
, and
Banerjee
,
S.
, 1986, “
Flooding in an Elbow Between a Vertical and a Horizontal or Near-Horizontal Pipe. Part II: Theory
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
12
, pp.
543
558
. 0301-9322
14.
Ohnuki
,
A.
,
Adachi
,
H.
, and
Murao
,
Y.
, 1988, “
Scale Effects on Countercurrent Gas-Liquid Flow in a Horizontal Tube Connected to an Inclined Riser
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
107
, pp.
283
294
. 0029-5493
15.
Lopez-De-Bertodano
,
M.
, 1994, “
Counter-Current Gas-Liquid Flow in a Pressurized Water Reactor Hot Leg
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
,
117
, pp.
126
133
. 0029-5639
16.
Kang
,
S. K.
,
Chu
,
I. -C.
,
No
,
H. C.
,
Chun
,
M. -H.
, and
Sung
,
C. -H.
, 1999, “
Air-Water Counter-Current Flow Limitation in a Horizontal Pipe Connected to an Inclined Riser
,”
Journal of Korean Nuclear Society
,
31
, pp.
548
560
.
17.
Kim
,
H. Y.
, and
No
,
H. C.
, 2002, “
Assessment of RELAP5/MOD3.2.2γ Against Flooding Database in Horizontal-to-Inclined Pipes
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
29
, pp.
835
850
. 0306-4549
18.
Navarro
,
M. A.
, 2005, “
Study of Countercurrent Flow Limitation in a Horizontal Pipe Connected to an Inclined One
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
235
, pp.
1139
1148
. 0029-5493
You do not currently have access to this content.