The components of syngas derived from coal, biomass, and waste are significantly different from those of typical gas turbine fuels, such as natural gas and fuel oils. The variations of hydrogen and inert gases can modify both the fluid and the combustion dynamics in the combustor. In particular, the characteristics of spark ignition can be profoundly affected. To understand the correlation between the varying fuel components and the reliability of ignition, a test system for spark ignition was established. The model combustor with a partial-premixed swirl burner was employed. The blending fuel with five components, hydrogen, carbon monoxide, methane, carbon dioxide and nitrogen, was used to model the synthesis gas used in industry. The ignition energy and the number of sparks leading to successful ignition were recorded. By varying the fuel components, the synthesis gases altered from medium to lower heat value fuels. The ignition time, ignition limit, and subsequent flame developments with variations of air mass flow rates and fuel components were systematically investigated. With the increase of airflow, the syngas with a lower hydrogen content has a shorter ignition time compared with higher hydrogen syngas in the lean condition, whereas in the rich condition, syngas with a higher hydrogen content has a shorter ignition time. The effects of the hydrogen content, inlet air Reynolds number and spark energy on the ignition limit were investigated. The ignition limit was enlarged with the increase in the hydrogen content and the spark energy. Meanwhile, three distinct flame patterns after ignition were investigated. Finally, a map for the characteristics of the ignition and subsequent flame development was obtained. The results are expected to provide valuable information for the design and operation of stable syngas combustion systems and also provide experimental data for the validations of theoretical modeling and numerical computations.

References

1.
Eran
,
S.
, and
James
,
C.
,
1986
, “
Spark Ignition of Combustible Gas Mixtures
,”
Combust. Flame
,
66
(
1
), pp.
17
25
.10.1016/0010-2180(86)90029-5
2.
Lim
,
M.
,
Anderson
,
R.
, and
Arpaci
,
V.
,
1987
, “
Prediction of Spark Kernel Development in Constant Volume Combustion
,”
Combust. Flame
,
69
(
3
), pp.
303
316
.10.1016/0010-2180(87)90123-4
3.
Lefebvre
,
A.
,
1998
,
Gas Turbine Combustion
, 3rd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
4.
Ahmed
,
S.
,
Balachandran
,
R.
,
Marchione
,
T.
, and
Mastorakos
,
E.
,
2007
, “
Spark Ignition of Turbulent Nonpremixed Bluff-Body Flames
,”
Combust. Flame
,
151
(
1
), pp.
366
385
.10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.06.012
5.
Walton
,
S.
,
He
,
X.
,
Zigler
,
B.
, and
Wooldridge
,
M.
,
2007
, “
An Experimental Investigation of the Ignition Properties of Hydrogen and Carbon Monoxide Mixtures for Syngas Turbine Applications
,”
Proc. Combust. Inst.
,
31
(
2
), pp.
3147
3154
.10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.059
6.
Lang
,
A.
,
Lecourt
,
R.
, and
Giuliani
,
F.
,
2010
, “
Statistical Evaluation of Ignition Phenomena in Turbojet Engines
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-23229. 10.1115/GT2010-23229
7.
Fyffe
,
D.
,
Moran
,
J.
,
Kannaiyan
,
K.
,
Sadr
,
R.
, and
Al-Sharshani
,
A.
,
2011
, “
Effect of GTL-Like Jet Fuel Composition on GT Engine Altitude Ignition Performance: Part I—Combustor Operability
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2011–45487. 10.1115/GT2011-45487
8.
Nakaya
,
S.
,
Hatori
,
K.
,
Tsue
,
M.
,
Kono
,
M.
,
Segawa
,
D.
,
Kadota
,
T.
, and
Gupta
,
A.
,
2011
, “
Numerical Analysis on Flame Kernel in Spark Ignition Methane/Air Mixtures
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
27
(
2
), pp.
363
370
.10.2514/1.47136
9.
Santavicca
,
D.
,
1995
, “
Spark Ignited Turbulent Flame Kernel Growth
,” Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
10.
Maly
,
R
.,
1981
, “
Ignition Model for Spark Discharges and the Early Phase of Flame Front Growth
,”
Symp. (Int.) Combust.
,
18
(
1
), pp.
1747
1754
.10.1016/S0082-0784(81)80179-8
11.
Vilyunov
,
V.
,
Nekrasov
,
E.
,
Baushev
,
V.
, and
Timokhin
,
A.
,
1976
, “
Laws Governing Spark Ignition and Establishment of Stationary Combustion Conditions
,”
Combust., Explos., Shock Waves
,
12
(
3
), pp.
320
325
.10.1007/BF00789013
12.
Krainov
,
A.
, and
Baimler
,
V.
,
2002
, “
Effect of Thermal Expansion on the Minimum Energy of Gas Spark Ignition
,”
Combust., Explos., Shock Waves
,
38
(
4
), pp.
387
390
.10.1023/A:1016294712346
13.
Zhang
,
H.
,
Zhang
,
X.
, and
Zhu
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Experimental Investigation of Thermoacoustic Instabilities for a Model Combustor With Varying Fuel Components
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
134
(
3
), p.
031504
.10.1115/1.4004212
14.
Nori
,
V.
, and
Seitzman
,
J.
,
2008
, “
Evaluation of Chemiluminescence as a Combustion Diagnostic Under Varying Operating Conditions
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2008-953. 10.2514/6.2008-953
15.
Mastorakos
,
E
.,
2009
, “
Ignition of Turbulent Non-Premixed Flames
,”
Progress Energy Combust. Sci.
,
35
(
1
), pp.
57
97
.10.1016/j.pecs.2008.07.002
16.
Ahmed
,
S.
, and
Mastorakos
,
E.
,
2006
, “
Spark Ignition of Lifted Turbulentjet Flames
,”
Combust. Flame
,
146
(
1
), pp.
215
231
.10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.03.007
17.
Brode
,
H. L.
,
1955
, “
Numerical Solutions of Spherical Blast Waves
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
,
26
(
6
), pp.
766
775
.10.1063/1.1722085
18.
Chen
,
Z.
, and
Ju
,
Y.
,
2007
, “
Theoretical Analysis of the Evolution From Ignition Kernel to Flame Ball and Planar Flame
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
,
11
(
3
), pp.
427
453
.10.1080/13647830600999850
19.
Ko
,
Y.
,
Arpaci
,
V. S.
, and
Anderson
,
R. W.
,
1991
, “
Spark Ignition of Propane-Air Mixtures Near the Minimum Ignition Energy: Part II. A Model Development
,”
Combust. Flame
,
83
(
1–2
), pp.
88
105
.10.1016/0010-2180(91)90205-P
20.
Teets
,
R.
, and
Sell
,
J.
,
1989
, “
Calorimetry of Ignition Sparks
,”
SAE
Technical Paper No. 880204. 10.4271/880204
21.
Kaminski
,
C.
,
Hult
,
J.
,
Aldén
,
M.
,
Lindenmaier
,
S.
,
Dreizler
,
A.
,
Maas
,
U.
, and
Baum
,
M.
,
2000
, “
Spark Ignition of Turbulent Methane/Air Mixtures Revealed by Time-Resolved Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence and Direct Numerical Simulations
,”
Proc. Combust. Inst.
,
28
(
1
), pp.
399
405
.10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80236-2
You do not currently have access to this content.