Accounting for the impact of uncaptured particles that cause compressor fouling and subsequently performance degradation when a filter system is in place is often ignored when evaluating the performance of filtration systems. Too often, the emphasis is on capture efficiency and the corresponding differential pressure loss, which are important aspects, however only constitutes a part of the overall impact on the engine performance. The main aim of this study is a first step to quantify the loss that is attributed to compressor fouling by the uncaptured particles, identify a threshold point for which further increase in pressure losses (increasing capture efficiency) no longer yields further increases in fouling levels, and subsequently investigate these respective losses and total losses in a reference high efficiency system (HES) and a hypothetical low efficiency system. Corrected operational data from a 268 MW gas turbine engine were used to evaluate the levels of degradation in the engine at different power settings. With the measured filter media pressure loss during operation and turbomatch (an in-house gas turbine performance simulation software), the impact of power reduction due to pressure loss of the filter was accounted for in the total estimated losses due to engine degradation. That of fouling was calculated based on applicable assumptions, while deducting the loss due to filtration systems from the total loss due to degradation. The study shows the inverse relationship between fouling effects and filter pressure losses as expected. More importantly, it indicates that the higher efficiency system performs better than the low efficiency system, notwithstanding the more dominant impact of higher differential pressure losses. It was also observed that the threshold where fouling effects are zero or negligible is around 800 Pa at high power setting and 600 Pa at lower power setting. In general, for all forms of the degradation using the engine data and simulation software, it is observed that at lower power settings, the impact on the engine is a lot more severe in a single-shaft constant speed operation.

References

1.
Igie
,
U.
, and
Minervino
,
O.
,
2014
, “
Impact of Inlet Filter Pressure Loss on Single and Two-Spool Gas Turbine Engines for Different Control Modes
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
136
(
9
), p.
091201
.
2.
Schroth
,
T.
, and
Cagna
,
M.
,
2008
, “
Economical Benefits of Highly Efficient Three-Stage Intake Air Filtration for Gas Turbines
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-50280.
3.
Kurz
,
R.
,
Brun
,
K.
, and
Wollie
,
M.
,
2009
, “
Degradation Effects on Industrial Gas Turbines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
131
(
6
), p.
062401
.
4.
Wilcox
,
M.
,
Baldwin
,
R.
,
Garcia-Hernandez
,
A.
, and
Brun
,
K.
,
2010
,
Guideline for Gas Turbine Inlet Air Filtration Systems
,
Gas Machinery Research Council
,
Dallas, TX
.
5.
Manstein
,
H.
, and
Rothmann
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Filter Concepts for Gas Turbines-Overview and Field Report on Utility Value Enhancement With Three-Stage Filtration
,”
VGB Conference—Gas Turbines and Operation of Gas Turbines
,
Mannheim, Germany
, June 24–25, pp. 78–82.
6.
Diakunchak
,
I.
,
1992
, “
Performance Deterioration in Industrial Gas Turbines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
114
(
2
), pp.
161
168
.
7.
Igie
,
U.
,
Pilidis
,
P.
,
Fouflias
,
D.
,
Ramsden
,
K.
, and
Laskaridis
,
P.
,
2014
, “
Industrial Gas Turbine Performance: Compressor Fouling and On-Line Washing
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
136
(
10
), p.
101001
.
8.
Syverud
,
E.
, and
Bakken
,
L.
,
2007
, “
Online Water Wash Tests of GE J85-13
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
129
(
1
), pp.
136
142
.
9.
Kurz
,
R.
, and
Brun
,
K.
,
2000
, “
Degradation in Gas Turbine Systems
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
123
(
1
), pp.
70
77
.
10.
Boyce
,
M.
, and
Gonzalez
,
F.
,
2005
, “
A Study of On-Line and Off-Line Turbine Washing to Optimize the Operation of a Gas Turbine
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
129
(
1
), pp.
114
122
.
11.
Cohen
,
H.
,
Rogers
,
G.
, and
Saravanamuttoo
,
H.
,
1996
,
Gas Turbine Theory
, 4th ed.,
Longman Group Limited
,
Essex, UK
.
12.
Eshati
,
S.
,
2012
, “
An Evaluation of Operation and Creep Study of a Stationary Gas Turbine
,” Ph.D. thesis, Cranfield University, Bedford, UK.
13.
Susta
,
M.
, and
Greth
,
M.
,
2001
, “
Efficiency Improvement Possibilities in CCGT Power Plant Technology
,” PowerGen Asia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Sept. 19–21.
14.
Corradetti
,
A.
, and
Desideri
,
U.
,
2005
, “
Analysis of Gas-Steam Combined Cycles With Natural Gas Reforming and CO2 Capture
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
127
(
3
), pp.
545
552
.
You do not currently have access to this content.