Abstract

Contemporary squeeze film dampers (SFDs) in air-breathing engines are short in length to limit weight and part count and lubricated with a low feed pressure to reduce oil storage and pumping power. In SFDs, O-rings (ORs) restrict side leakage and increase the viscous damping while a adding a modest centering stiffness. Continuing a long-term project characterizing SFDs for aircraft engines and extending the original work (San Andrés and Rodríguez, 2021, “On the Experimental Dynamic Force Performance of a Squeeze Film Damper Supplied Through a Check Valve and Sealed With O-Rings,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 143(11), p. 111011) the paper details measurements of the forced performance of an OR sealed damper (OR-SFD) with diameter D =127 mm, land length L = 0.2 D, and radial clearance c = 0.0022 D. Lubricant ISO VG 2 supplied at 0.69 bar(g) fills an upstream oil plenum and flows into the middle of the land through a single orifice configured with a check valve. Measurements of applied single-frequency dynamic loads, along with the ensuing damper displacements and accelerations serve to identify the parameters of the test structure, ORs, and SFD. The tests encompass centered whirl motions with amplitude r = 0.050.45c, and a range of whirl frequencies, ω = 10–130 Hz. Note the squeeze velocity vs =  rω reaches 102 mm/s. The ORs force coefficients are nearly invariant with frequency but do depend on the orbit amplitude. The ORs' stiffness (KOR) decreases by 75% as the motion amplitude increases, r → 0.45c, likely due to the large elastic deformations and slow recovery of the ORs material. For small amplitude motions (r/c = 0.05 and 0.10), the ORs damping coefficient (COR) is ∼10% of the overall coefficient for the lubricated system (CL), while for r/c > 0.25, COR ∼ 0.03CL. For small amplitudes of whirl (r ≤ 0.25c), the SFD experimental viscous damping (CSFD) and added mass (MSFD) coefficients, identified over a shorter frequency range (vs<30 mm/s) equal theoretical magnitudes for a fully sealed damper. As the orbit size grows to r = 0.45c MSFD drops nearly by 75% and CSFD decreases by ∼40% due to the onset of both lubricant cavitation and air ingestion occurring for squeeze velocities vs ≥ 24.5 mm/s, as also seen in the recorded dynamic pressures and video recordings of a bubbly mixture leaving the damper. A comprehensive flow model predicts CSFD and MSFD about 8% and 12% larger than the experimentally identified coefficients. A novel approach enables the estimation of the gas volume fraction (GVF) generated in the damper which rapidly increases as vs grows. The simple procedure draws into a deflated balloon the material contents in the squeeze film, weighs the sample, and identifies its volume to produce an estimate of the GVF. The procedure to quantify the GFV will assist in the validation of predictive tools.

References

1.
San Andrés
,
L.
,
2010
, “
Squeeze Film Dampers
,”
Modern Lubrication Theory
,
Texas A&M University Digital Libraries
, College Station, TX, accessed June 21, 2021, http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/93253
2.
Miyachi
,
T.
,
Hoshiya
,
S.
,
Sofue
,
Y.
,
Matsuki
,
M.
, and
Torisaki
,
T.
,
1979
, “
Oil Squeeze Film Dampers for Reducing Vibration of Aircraft Gas Turbine Engines
,”
ASME
Paper No. 79-GT-133.10.1115/79-GT-133
3.
The Parker Hannifin Corporation
,
2020
, Parker O-ring Handbook ORD 5700,
Parker Hannifin Corporation
,
Lexington, KY,
accessed Sept. 30, https://www.parker.com/Literature/O-Ring%20Division%20Literature/ORD%205700.pdf
4.
Payne
,
A. R.
,
1962
, “
The Dynamic Properties of Carbon Black-Loaded Natural Rubber Vulcanizates. Part I
,”
J. App Pol. Sci.
,
6
(
19
), pp.
57
63
.10.1002/app.1962.070061906
5.
Smalley
,
A.
,
Darlow
,
M.
, and
Mehta
,
R.
,
1978
, “
The Dynamic Characteristics of O-Rings
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
100
(
1
), pp.
132
138
.10.1115/1.3453877
6.
Nashif
,
A. D.
,
Jones
,
D. I. G.
, and
Henderson
,
J. P.
,
1985
,
Vibration Damping
,
Wiley
, New York, pp.
67
84
.
7.
Sun
,
C. T.
, and
Lu
,
Y. P.
,
1995
,
Vibration Damping of Structural Elements
,
Prentice Hall PTR
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
, pp.
26
44
.
8.
Memmott
,
E. A.
,
2010
, “
Application of Squeeze Film Dampers to a Large Centrifugal Compressor
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-23553.10.1115/GT2010-23553
9.
Li
,
W.
,
Braman
,
C.
,
Hantz
,
B.
,
Thorat
,
M.
, and
Pettinato
,
B.
,
2020
, “
Squeeze Film Damper Bearing With Double-Ended Beam Springs: Part I – Design and Analysis
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2020-16329.10.1115/GT2020-16329
10.
Li
,
W.
,
Braman
,
C.
,
Hantz
,
B.
,
Thorat
,
M.
, and
Pettinato
,
B.
,
2020
, “
Squeeze Film Damper Bearing With Double-Ended Beam Springs: Part II – Experimental Validation
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2020-15491.10.1115/GT2020-15491
11.
Rodríguez
,
B.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
,
2022
, “
Measurements of the Dynamic Forced Response of an O-Rings Sealed Squeeze Film Damper Supplied With a Low Supply Pressure
,” Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, Report No.
TRC-SFD-01-22
.https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/197784
12.
San Andrés
,
L.
,
Jeung
,
S.-H.
,
Den
,
S.
, and
Savela
,
G.
,
2016
, “
Squeeze Film Dampers: A Further Experimental Appraisal of Their Dynamic Performance
,”
45th Turbomachinery Symposium, Texas A&M University
,
Houston, TX
,
Sept. 12–15
.http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/159802
13.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Koo
,
B.
,
2018
, “
Effect of Lubricant Supply Pressure on SFD Performance: Ends Sealed With O-Rings and Piston Rings
,” Proceedings of the IFToMM Conference on Rotor Dynamics,
Río de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Sept. 23–27
, Paper No.
IFTOMM2018-0181
.10.1007/978-3-319-99262-4_26
14.
San Andrés
,
L.
,
Koo
,
B.
, and
Jeung
,
S.-H.
,
2019
, “
Experimental Force Coefficients for Two Sealed Ends Squeeze Film Dampers (Piston Rings and O-Rings), an Assessment of Their Similarities and Differences
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power
,
141
(
2
), p.
021024
.10.1115/1.4040902
15.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Rodríguez
,
B.
,
2021
, “
On the Experimental Dynamic Force Performance of a Squeeze Film Damper Supplied Through a Check Valve and Sealed With O-Rings
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power
,
143
(
11
), p.
111011
.10.1115/1.4051964
16.
Koo
,
B.
,
2019
, “
Experiments and Models for Operation of a Sealed Ends Squeeze Film Damper: A Step Towards Quantifying Air Ingestion in Squeeze Films
,” Ph.D. Dissertation,
Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
.
17.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Jeung
,
S.-H.
,
2016
, “
Orbit-Model Force Coefficients for Fluid Film Bearings: A Step Beyond Linearization
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
138
(
2
), p.
022502
.10.1115/1.4031237
18.
Koo
,
B.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
,
2020
, “
Model and Experimental Verification of the Dynamic Forced Performance of a Tightly Sealed Squeeze Film Damper Supplied With a Bubbly Mixture
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
142
(
1
), p.
011023
.10.1115/1.4044994
19.
Gheller
,
E.
,
Chatterton
,
S.
,
Vania
,
A.
, and
Pennacchi
,
P.
,
2022
, “
Squeeze Film Damper Modeling: A Comprehensive Approach
,”
Machines
,
10
(
9
), p.
781
.10.3390/machines10090781
20.
Torres
,
J.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
,
2023
, “
Leakage and Rotordynamic Force Coefficients of Two Seal Types Operating With Wet Gas
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2023-100555.10.1115/GT2023-100555
You do not currently have access to this content.