From the above analysis, it is seen that the equations (11), (0) and (0) are equivalent to Eqs. (0) and (0) and (16b). Equations (11) and (12) are transverse and longitudinal thermal dispersion conductivities, respectively, which are expressed in terms of porosity and generally defined Peclet number However, Eqs. (11) and (12) present unreasonable results. For example, the thermal dispersion conductivities given by Eqs. (11) and (0) increase with the increase of porosity. If porosity is 1, Eqs. (11) and (0) present the infinite values for transverse and longitudinal thermal dispersion conductivities, while Eq. (0) presents nonzero longitudinal thermal dispersion conductivity. These are inconsistent with physical situation because the thermal dispersion should be reduced with the increase of porosity, and when porosity is 1, there is no dispersion and thermal dispersion conductivity should be zero.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the transverse and longitudinal thermal dispersion conductivity correlations, Eq. (0), Eq. (0) and (16b) given by Refs. 1 2, are questionable because they present unreasonable results.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China through Grant No. 10272052.
Nomenclature
- D
= size of square rod or size of particle
- H
= size of structural unit
- k
= thermal conductivity
= generally defined Peclet number given by Eq. (2)
= the macroscopically uniform velocity
= volume
- ε
= porosity
Department of Physics and the State Key Laboratory of Plastic Forming and Die & Mold Tech., Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, P. R. China. E-mail: yuboming2003@yahoo.com.cn, Fax: 86-27-87542153.
The State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics (LNM), Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, 100080, China.