This paper addresses the prediction of plastic tensile instability and ductile fracture of a specimen undergoing a compression test (simple upsetting). The method used to predict failure is based primarily on Thomason’s approach for predicting tensile plastic instability in compression tests. However, to apply this method to in-process prediction, a means for calculating the flow stress-strain properties from in-process measurements is needed. A method is introduced that is derived from Bridgman’s correction factor for effective stress after necking occurs in the tensile test, but with a different approach that is suitable for compression specimens. The new correction factor enables one to correct the effective stress after barreling occurs, which eliminates the need for an ideal test (without barreling) to find the effective stress of a specimen. The results were in agreement with those derived from an ideal compression test. Stress data found using this correction factor was then used to predict failure using Thomason’s method.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 1983
This article was originally published in
Journal of Engineering for Industry
Research Papers
A Method for In-Process Failure Prediction in Cold Upset Forging
O. Ettouney,
O. Ettouney
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
D. E. Hardt
D. E. Hardt
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
O. Ettouney
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. 02139
D. E. Hardt
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. 02139
J. Eng. Ind. Aug 1983, 105(3): 161-167
Published Online: August 1, 1983
Article history
Received:
December 27, 1982
Online:
July 30, 2009
Article
Article discussed|
View article
Connected Content
Citation
Ettouney, O., and Hardt, D. E. (August 1, 1983). "A Method for In-Process Failure Prediction in Cold Upset Forging." ASME. J. Eng. Ind. August 1983; 105(3): 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3185883
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
On-Orbit Processing and Hardware Performance of Microgravity Hydrothermal Synthesis for Graphene Aerogel
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (December 2024)
A Review on Metallic Drilling Burrs: Geometry, Formation, and Effect on the Mechanical Strength of Metallic Assemblies
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (April 2025)
Related Articles
Failure Mechanism of Laser Welds in Lap-Shear Specimens of a High Strength Low Alloy Steel
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (December,2012)
Forming Limits
J. Vib., Acoust., Stress, and Reliab (April,1983)
An Alternative Finite Element Formulation to Predict Ductile Fracture in Highly Deformable Materials
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April,2025)
Prediction of Necking in Tubular Hydroforming Using an Extended Stress-Based Forming Limit Curve
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (January,2007)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Material Flow and Defect Formation in Forging an Airfoil Shape from Metal-Matrix Composites
Formability of Metallic Materials—2000 A.D.
Applications of Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics in Section XI, ASME Code Evaluations
Online Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes
The Conditions at Ductile Fracture in Tension Tests
Fracture Mechanics: Twenty-Third Symposium