This paper presents experimental results obtained for a variety of drawbeads typical of automotive applications, and compares the results with those obtained from the numerical model presented in the first part of this work (Triantafyllidis et al., 1986). The deformation process is divided into two phases: the “locking/clamping” phase as the binder closes to form the sheet around the drawbead, and the “pulling” phase as the panel is formed, causing the material to be drawn through the bead. Metals considered are SKDQ steel, aluminum, and brass. Dry and lubricated conditions are investigated. Good correlations between model and experiment are obtained for strain distributions over the sheet and excellent agreement is observed in the binder clamping forces. Using a Coulomb friction law in the model, horizontal restraining forces are compared to experimental results. The model is shown to accurately predict the influence of variations in material, geometry, and friction conditions. However, the correlation between the model and experiment is not as good in two cases: as the punch (male bead) reaches the “locked” condition, and in the initial stages of “pulling” deformation. Reasons for the discrepancies are discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 1987
Research Papers
An Analysis of Drawbeads in Sheet Metal Forming: Part II—Experimental Verification
B. Maker,
B. Maker
Aerospace Engineering Department, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125
Search for other works by this author on:
S. K. Samanta,
S. K. Samanta
Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics Department, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125
Search for other works by this author on:
G. Grab,
G. Grab
Metallurgy Department, Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI 48121-2053
Search for other works by this author on:
N. Triantafyllidis
N. Triantafyllidis
Aerospace Engineering Department, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Search for other works by this author on:
B. Maker
Aerospace Engineering Department, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125
S. K. Samanta
Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics Department, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125
G. Grab
Metallurgy Department, Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI 48121-2053
N. Triantafyllidis
Aerospace Engineering Department, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
J. Eng. Mater. Technol. Apr 1987, 109(2): 164-170 (7 pages)
Published Online: April 1, 1987
Article history
Received:
May 5, 1986
Online:
September 15, 2009
Citation
Maker, B., Samanta, S. K., Grab, G., and Triantafyllidis, N. (April 1, 1987). "An Analysis of Drawbeads in Sheet Metal Forming: Part II—Experimental Verification." ASME. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. April 1987; 109(2): 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3225957
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Hot Deformation Flow Stress of Sintered Al–Zn–Mg Alloy
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April 2025)
Blast Mitigation Using Monolithic Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April 2025)
Irradiation Damage Evolution Dependence on Misorientation Angle for Σ 5 Grain Boundary of Nb: An Atomistic Simulation-Based Study
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (July 2025)
Related Articles
Experimental Implementation of Neural Network Springback Control for Sheet Metal Forming
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April,2003)
Metallic Forging Using Electrical Flow as an Alternative to Warm/Hot Working
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (February,2007)
An Analysis of Drawbeads in Sheet Metal Forming: Part I—Problem Formulation
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (October,1986)
Critical Structures of Metal Destruction Under the Process of Wear
J. Tribol (January,2000)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Introduction and Definitions
Handbook on Stiffness & Damping in Mechanical Design
Cut Edge Behavior
New Advanced High Strength Steels: Optimizing Properties
Matrix Equations of the Contact Problem
Contact in Structural Mechanics: A Weighted Residual Approach