This part of these two companion papers demonstrates the computer implementation of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation for three-dimensional beam elements. Two beam elements that relax the assumptions of Euler-Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam theories are developed. These two elements take into account the effect of rotary inertia, shear deformation and torsion, and yet they lead to a constant mass matrix. As a consequence, the Coriolis and centrifugal forces are identically equal to zero. Both beam elements use the same interpolating polynomials and have the same number of nodal coordinates. However, one of the elements has two nodes, while the other has four nodes. The results obtained using the two elements are compared with the results obtained using existing incremental methods. Unlike existing large rotation vector formulations, the results of this paper show that no special numerical integration methods need to be used in order to satisfy the principle of work and energy when the absolute nodal coordinate formulation is used. These results show that this formulation can be used in manufacturing applications such as high speed forming and extrusion problems in which the element cross section dimensions significantly change.

1.
Przemieniecki, J. S., 1985, Theory of Matrix Structural Analysis, 2nd edition, Dover.
2.
Simo
,
J. C.
, and
Vu-Quoc
,
L.
,
1986
, “
On the Dynamics of Flexible Beams Under Large Overall Motion-the Plane Case: Part I
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
53
, pp.
849
854
.
3.
Simo
,
J. C.
,
1985
, “
A Finite Strain Beam Formulation. The Three Dimensional Dynamics Problem. Part I
,”
Journal of Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
,
49
, pp.
55
70
.
4.
Shabana, A. A., and Yakoub, R., 2001, “Three Dimensional Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation for Beam Elements: Theory,” Submitted to the ASME J. Mech. Des., a companion paper.
5.
Shabana, A. A., 1996, “An Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation for the Large Rotation and Deformation Analysis of Flexible Bodies,” Technical Report MBS96-1-UIC, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
6.
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
1997
, “
Flexible Multibody Dynamics: Review of Past and Recent Developments
,”
Multibody System Dynamics
,
1
, pp.
189
222
.
7.
Shabana, A. A., 1998, Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8.
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
1998
, “
Computer Implementation of the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation for Flexible Multibody Dynamics
,”
Nonlinear Dyn.
,
16
, pp.
293
306
.
9.
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
Hussien
,
H. A.
, and
Escalona
,
J. L.
,
1998
, “
Application of the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation to Large Rotation and Large Deformation Problems
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
120
, pp.
188
195
.
10.
Argyris
,
J. H.
,
Balmer
,
H.
,
Doltsinis
,
J. St.
,
Dunne
,
P. C.
,
Haase
,
M.
,
Kleiber
,
M.
,
Male-jannakis
,
G. A.
,
Mlejnek
,
H.-P.
,
Mu¨ller
,
M.
, and
Scharpf
,
D. W.
,
1979
, “
Finite Element Method-The Natural Approach
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
17/18
, pp.
1
106
.
11.
Bauchau
,
O. A.
, and
Kang
,
N. K.
,
1993
, “
A Multibody Formulation for Helicopter Structural Dynamic Analysis,”
J. Am. Helicopter Soc.
38
, pp.
3
14
.
12.
Rankin
,
C. C.
, and
Brogan
,
F. A.
,
1986
, “
An Element Independent Corotational Procedure for the Treatment of Large Rotations
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
108
,
165
174
.
13.
Bonet, J., and Wood, R. D., 1997, Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14.
Cook, R. D., Malkus, D. S., and Plesha, M. E., 1989, Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 3rd edition, John Wiley & Sons.
15.
Crisfield, M. A., 1997, Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, Volume 1: Essentials, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
16.
Gere, J. M., and Timoshenko, S. P., 1984, Mechanics of Material, 2nd edition, Brooks/Cole Engineering Division, Monterey, California.
17.
Yakoub
,
R. Y.
, and
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
1999
, “
Use of Cholesky Coordinates and the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation in the Computer Simulation of Flexible Multibody Systems
,”
Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics
,
20
, pp.
267
282
.
18.
Yakoub, R. Y., 2001, “A New Three Dimensional Absolute Coordinate Based Beam Element With Application to Wheel/Rail Interaction,” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago.
19.
Cowper
,
G. R.
,
1966
, “
The Shear Coefficient in Timoshenko Beam Theory
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
33
, pp.
335
340
.
20.
Dym, C. L., and Shames, I. H., 1973, Solid Mechanics, A Variational Approach, McGraw-Hill.
21.
ANSYS User’s Manual, 1997, Theory, Ninth Edition, SAS IP, Inc. ©.
22.
Crisfield, M. A., 1997, Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, Volume 2: Advanced Topics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
You do not currently have access to this content.