A spherical joint must allow adequate mobility between the ball and socket. Unless the specific geometric requirement of the spherical joint, namely the trajectory of the ball stem in the socket, is known, the realization of a synthesized mechanism containing a spherical joint can become an endless trial and error process or even a fruitless attempt. Typical examples can be found in RSSR mechanisms. For a synthesized RSSR mechanism, this paper presents the closed form equation describing the spherical trajectory of the ball in the socket and the design and manufacturing issues of the spherical joints. It offers the classification scheme of spherical joints based on the required ball rotatability in the socket and shows how the necessary socket opening of the spherical joints is affected. The size and location of the socket in a spherical joint must be properly determined to meet the rotatability requirement and in many situations, a conventional spherical joint with a circular socket opening cannot be used. Essential geometric and location information regarding to the use of non-circular socket opening, spherical grooved pair, as well as revolute joints to replace the conventional spherical joints to realize a synthesized RSSR mechanism is presented. The proposed concept and method can be extrapolated to other mechanisms containing spherical joints.

1.
Harrisberger
,
E. L.
, 1963, Gross Motion of a Space Mechanism, PhD dissertation, Purdue University.
2.
Skreiner
,
M.
, 1967, “
Mobility Regions of a Spatial Four-Link Mechanism
,”
J. Mech.
0022-2569,
2
, pp.
415
427
.
3.
Nolle
,
H.
, 1969, “
Ranges of Motion Transfer by the RGGR Mechanisms
,”
J. Mech.
0022-2569,
4
, pp.
145
157
.
4.
Freudenstein
,
F.
, and
Kiss
,
I. S.
, 1969, “
Type Determination of Skew Four-Bar Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
89
,
220
224
.
5.
Freudenstein
,
F.
, and
Primrose
,
E. J. F.
, 1976, “
On the Criteria for the Rotatability of the Cranks of a Skew Four-Bar Linkage
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
98
, pp.
1285
1288
.
6.
Gupta
,
K. V.
, and
Radcliffe
,
C. W.
, 1971, “
Mobility Analysis of Planar and Spatial Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
93
, pp.
125
130
.
7.
Rastegar
,
T.
, and
Tu
,
Q.
, 1992, “
Approximated Grashof-Type Movability Conditions for RSSR Mechanisms with Force Transmission Limitations
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
114
, pp.
74
81
.
8.
Williams
,
R. L.
, II
, and
Reinholtz
,
C. F.
, Dec. 1986, “
Proof of Grashof’s Law Using Polynomial Discriminants
,”
ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom. Des.
0738-0666,
108
(
4
), pp.
562
564
.
9.
Ting
,
K. L.
, 1989, “
Mobility Criteria of Single Loop N-Bar Linkages
,”
ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom. Des.
0738-0666,
111
(
4
), pp.
504
507
.
10.
Ting
,
K. L.
, and
Liu
,
Y. W.
, 1991, “
Rotatability Laws for N-Bar Kinematic Chains and Their Proof
,”
J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
113
(
1
), pp.
32
39
.
11.
Ting
,
K. L.
, and
Dou
,
X.
, 1994, “
Branch, Mobility Criteria, and Classification of RSSR and Other Bimodal Linkages
,” ASME Design Technical Conference, DE-Vol.
70
, pp.
303
310
.
12.
Soylemez
,
E.
, and
Freudenstein
,
F.
, 1982, “
Transmission Optimization of Spatial 4-Link Mechanisms
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
0094-114X,
17
, No.
4
, pp.
263
283
.
13.
Zhang
,
W.
, 1993, “
The Limit Values of Pressure Angle and Position of Maximal Pressure Angle of the Spatial RSSR Linkages
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
0094-114X,
28
, No. 4, pp.
593
599
.
14.
Stanisic
,
M. M.
, and
Mirusky
,
W. F.
, 1988, “
Optimization of Spherical Joint Attachment in Spatial Linkages
,”
ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom. Des.
0738-0666,
110
, pp.
440
445
.
15.
Stanisic
,
M. M.
, and
Gupta
,
K. C.
, September 1990, “
Closed-Form Solutions to The Spherical Joint Attachment Problem
,” ASME Design Technical Conference DE-Vol.
25
, pp.
177
182
.
You do not currently have access to this content.