Although cooperative learning in a team setting is a common approach for integrating problem-based learning into undergraduate science and engineering, standard assessment tools do not exists to evaluate learning outcomes. As a result, novel techniques need to be developed to assess learning in team-based design projects. This paper describes the experiences and lessons learned in assessing student performance in team-based, project courses culminating in a senior capstone experience that integrates industry-sponsored design projects. A set of rubrics linked to the instructional objectives was developed that define and communicate expectations during each of three project phases. Rubrics for each phase incorporate three fundamental areas of team performance assessment: (i) synthesis of a valid concept; (ii) management of resources; and (iii) interpersonal interaction and communication. At the end of each phase, both the faculty and industry sponsor use the same rubric to assess student team performance. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the assessment data collected over the last 5 years indicated that student performance, measured by faculty grades and industry sponsor evaluations, was not significantly affected by the faculty advisor, project type, or sponsoring company size. These results are attributed primarily to the faculty focusing more on assessing student performance in executing the design process and less on the actual project results. The analysis also revealed that faculty assessments of student performance did not correlate very well with industry sponsor assessments. To address this, a revised set of evaluation rubrics were developed and are currently being used to better articulate expectations from both faculty and industrial sponsor perspectives.

1.
McNeill
,
B.
,
Bellamy
,
L.
, and
Burrows
,
V. A.
, 2001,
Introduction to Engineering Design: The Workbook
, 10th ed.,
McGraw-Hill/Primis
, New York.
2.
Doepker
,
P. E.
, 2006, “
Integrating the Product Realization Process into the Design Curriculum—Ten Years of Experience and Evolution
,”
Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2006, ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, Philadelphia, PA, Paper No. DETC2006-99371.
3.
Todd
,
R.
, and
Magleby
,
S.
, 2003, “
Creating a Successful Capstone Program by Considering the Needs of Stakeholders
,”
Proceedings of the 2003 Ibero American Summit on Engineering Education
, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
4.
Christensen
,
K.
, and
Rundus
,
D.
, 2003, “
The Capstone Senior Design Course: An Initiative in Partnering with Industry
,”
Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference
, Boulder, CO.
5.
Wang
,
S.
, 2005, “
University-Industry Partnership for Industry Sponsored Projects in Capstone Design
,”
Proceedings of the Conference on Exploring Innovation in Education and Research, iCEER-2005
, Tainan, Taiwan.
6.
Jorgensen
,
J.
,
Mescher
,
A.
, and
Fridley
,
J. L.
, 2001, “
Industry Collaborative Capstone Design Projects
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education
, Oslo, Norway.
7.
Lamancusa
,
J.
, and
Simpson
,
T.
, 2004, “
The Learning Factory 10 Years of Impact at Penn State
,”
Proceedings of the 2004 Int. Conference on Engineering Education
, Gainesville FL.
8.
Lamancusa
,
J.
,
George
,
R.
, and
Soyster
,
A.
, 1997, “
Industry-Based Projects in Academia - What Works and What Doesn’t
,”
Proceedings of 1997 ASEE Annual Conference
, Milwaukee, WI.
9.
Peterson
,
J. N.
, 2000, “
Experiences in Capstone Design Projects: Partnerships With Industrial Sponsors
,”
Proceedings 2000 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Engineering Education Beyond the Millennium
, St. Louis, MO.
10.
Ruwanpura
,
J. Y.
, and
Brown
,
T. G.
, 2006, “
Innovative Final-Year Undergraduate Design Project Course Using an International Project
,”
J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract.
1052-3928,
132
(
4
), pp.
297
305
.
11.
McKenzie
,
L.
,
Trevisan
,
M.
,
Davis
,
D.
, and
Beyerlein
,
S.
, 2004, “
Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A National Study
,”
Proceedings of the 2004 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
, Salt Lake City, UT.
12.
Olds
,
B.
,
Moskal
,
B.
, and
Miller
,
R.
, 2005, “
Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approaches. and Future Collaborations
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
1069-4730,
94
(
1
), pp.
13
25
.
13.
Brackin
,
M. P.
, and
Gibson
,
J. D.
, 2002, “
Methods of Assessing Student Learning in Capstone Design Projects with Industry: A Five Year Review
,”
Proceedings 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
, Montreal, Canada.
14.
Doepker
,
P. E.
, 2006, “
Industry and Academic Collaboration via Capstone Design Projects – Recruiting and Retaining Sponsors
,
Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2006, ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, Philadelphia, PA, Paper No. DETC2006-99728.
15.
Doepker
,
P. E.
, and
Murray
,
A. P.
, 2001, “
Experiences in Integrating the Product Realization Process into the Design Curriculum
,
Proceedings of DETC 2001 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, Pittsburgh, PA, Paper No. DETC2001/IED-21210.
16.
Hanna
,
A. L.
, and
Sullivan
,
K. T.
, 2005, “
Bridging the Gap between Academics and Practice: A Capstone Design Experience
,”
J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract.
1052-3928,
131
(
1
), pp.
59
62
.
17.
Norback
,
J. S.
, and
Hardin
,
J. R.
, 2005, “
Integrating Workforce Communication into Senior Design
,”
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications
,
48
(
4
), pp.
413
426
.
18.
WebCT, 2005, “
WebCT – Learning Without Limits
,” WebCT, Inc,. Lynnfield, MA, http://www.webct.comhttp://www.webct.com (31 May, 2005).
You do not currently have access to this content.