This paper studies “creativity” in engineering education, by examining the perception of instructors and students. We aim to identify factors that impede a creative environment (creativity blockers). The study entails a review of established research in the fields of psychology and educational psychology to identify factors which create an educational environment conducive to creativity. These factors are formalized in the Ten Maxims of Creativity in Education, a set of criteria that constitute an educational environment conducive to fostering creativity in students. These maxims form the basis for our work in examining the contemporary engineering education. Extensive surveys are designed, created, distributed, and statistically quantified to study the perceptions of engineering educators and students, in comparison to nonengineering educators and students. The results unfortunately show that current engineering students experience almost none of the Ten Maxims of Creativity as part of their academic experiences.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 2007
Research Papers
Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education: A Study of Instructors and Students Perceptions
Kazem Kazerounian,
Kazem Kazerounian
Professor
Fellow ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut
, Storrs, CT 06269-3139
Search for other works by this author on:
Stephany Foley
Stephany Foley
NSF Graduate Fellow
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut
, Storrs, CT 06269-3139
Search for other works by this author on:
Kazem Kazerounian
Professor
Fellow ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut
, Storrs, CT 06269-3139
Stephany Foley
NSF Graduate Fellow
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut
, Storrs, CT 06269-3139J. Mech. Des. Jul 2007, 129(7): 761-768 (8 pages)
Published Online: February 28, 2007
Article history
Received:
October 4, 2006
Revised:
February 28, 2007
Citation
Kazerounian, K., and Foley, S. (February 28, 2007). "Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education: A Study of Instructors and Students Perceptions." ASME. J. Mech. Des. July 2007; 129(7): 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2739569
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Multi-Split Configuration Design for Fluid-Based Thermal Management Systems
J. Mech. Des (February 2025)
Related Articles
Articulating a Learning Objective
J. Mech. Des (July,2007)
What Constitutes a Good Design Education Research Paper That Would be Suitable for JMD?
J. Mech. Des (March,2011)
Critical Thinking Assessment in Engineering Education: A Scopus-Based Literature Review
J. Mech. Des (July,2024)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
The future state of content & competency-based engineering education: Lean Engineering Education
Lean Engineering Education: Driving Content and Competency Mastery
Development of Electronic Learning Industrial Environment (eLIN) System for Requirement Engineering Education
International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 3rd (ICCTD 2011)
Blended Learning through Integrating Lego Mindstorms NXT Robots in Engineering Education
Advances in Multidisciplinary Engineering