Environmental protection legislation, consumer interest in “green” products, a trend toward corporate responsibility and recognition of the potential profitability of salvaging operations, has resulted in increased interest in product take back. However, the cost effectiveness of product take-back operations is hampered by many factors, including the high cost of disassembly and a widely varying feedstock of dissimilar products. Two types of decisions must be made, how to carry out the disassembly process in the most efficient manner to “mine” the value-added that is still embedded in the product, and then how to best utilize that value-added once it is recovered. This paper presents a method for making those decisions. The concept of a transition matrix is integrated with mixed integer linear programming to determine the extent to which products should be disassembled and simultaneously determine the optimal end-of-life (EOL) strategy for each resultant component or subassembly. The main contribution of this paper is the simultaneous consideration of selective disassembly, multiple products, and the value added that remains in each component or subassembly. Shared disassembly operations and capacity limits are considered. An example using two cell phone products illustrates application of the model. The obtained results demonstrate the most economical level of disassembly for each cell phone and the best EOL options for each resultant module. In addition, the cell phone example shows that sharing disassembly operations between different products makes disassembly more cost effective compared with the case in which each product is disassembled separately.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: behdad1@illinois.edu
e-mail: kwak14@illinois.edu
e-mail: hmkim@illinois.edu
e-mail: thurston@illinois.edu
Article navigation
April 2010
Research Papers
Simultaneous Selective Disassembly and End-of-Life Decision Making for Multiple Products That Share Disassembly Operations
Sara Behdad,
Sara Behdad
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Industrial and Enterprise System Engineering,
e-mail: behdad1@illinois.edu
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
, 104 S. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801
Search for other works by this author on:
Minjung Kwak,
Minjung Kwak
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Industrial and Enterprise System Engineering,
e-mail: kwak14@illinois.edu
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
, 104 S. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801
Search for other works by this author on:
Harrison Kim,
Harrison Kim
Assistant Professor
Department of Industrial and Enterprise System Engineering,
e-mail: hmkim@illinois.edu
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
, 104 S. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801
Search for other works by this author on:
Deborah Thurston
Deborah Thurston
Gutgsell Professor
Department of Industrial and Enterprise System Engineering,
e-mail: thurston@illinois.edu
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
, 104 S. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801
Search for other works by this author on:
Sara Behdad
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Industrial and Enterprise System Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
, 104 S. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801e-mail: behdad1@illinois.edu
Minjung Kwak
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Industrial and Enterprise System Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
, 104 S. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801e-mail: kwak14@illinois.edu
Harrison Kim
Assistant Professor
Department of Industrial and Enterprise System Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
, 104 S. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801e-mail: hmkim@illinois.edu
Deborah Thurston
Gutgsell Professor
Department of Industrial and Enterprise System Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
, 104 S. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801e-mail: thurston@illinois.edu
J. Mech. Des. Apr 2010, 132(4): 041002 (9 pages)
Published Online: March 30, 2010
Article history
Received:
May 28, 2009
Revised:
February 1, 2010
Online:
March 30, 2010
Published:
March 30, 2010
Citation
Behdad, S., Kwak, M., Kim, H., and Thurston, D. (March 30, 2010). "Simultaneous Selective Disassembly and End-of-Life Decision Making for Multiple Products That Share Disassembly Operations." ASME. J. Mech. Des. April 2010; 132(4): 041002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001207
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
A Multi-Layer Parallelogram Flexure Architecture for Higher Out-of-Plane Load Bearing Stiffness
J. Mech. Des (July 2025)
Reading Users' Minds With Large Language Models: Mental Inference for Artificial Empathy in Design
J. Mech. Des (June 2025)
MSEval: A Dataset for Material Selection in Conceptual Design to Evaluate Algorithmic Models
J. Mech. Des (April 2025)
Related Articles
Optimal Allocation of Lift-Gas Rates Under Multiple Facility Constraints: A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Approach
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December,2006)
End-of-Life Decision Making With Uncertain Product Return Quantity
J. Mech. Des (October,2012)
Evaluating Supplier Performance Using DEA and Piecewise Triangular Fuzzy AHP
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng (September,2008)
Integrating Reconfiguration Cost Into the Design of Multi-Period Scalable Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (February,2007)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Scheduling of the Thai Premier League by Integer Programming
International Conference on Computer Research and Development, 5th (ICCRD 2013)
An Implemenation of Mixed Integer Programming Model for Gene Selection in Cancer Classification Using Microary Data
International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering (ICSTE 2012)
Hybrid GA∕IA Method for Multiobjective Nonlinear Integer Programming Problems
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks Volume 18