Abstract

As demands for clean and sustainable energy renew interests in nuclear power to meet future energy demands, generation IV nuclear reactors are seen as having the potential to provide the improvements required for nuclear power generation. However, for their benefits to be fully realized, it is important to explore the performance of the reactors when coupled to different configurations of closed-cycle gas turbine power conversion systems. The configurations provide variation in performance due to different working fluids over a range of operating pressures and temperatures. The objective of this paper is to undertake analyses at the design and off-design conditions in combination with a recuperated closed-cycle gas turbine and comparing the influence of carbon dioxide and nitrogen as the working fluid in the cycle. The analysis is demonstrated using an in-house tool, which was developed by the authors. The results show that the choice of working fluid controls the range of cycle operating pressures, temperatures, and overall performance of the power plant due to the thermodynamic and heat properties of the fluids. The performance results favored the nitrogen working fluid over CO2 due to the behavior CO2 below its critical conditions. The analyses intend to aid the development of cycles for generation IV nuclear power plants (NPPs) specifically gas-cooled fast reactors (GFRs) and very high-temperature reactors (VHTRs).

References

1.
Abram
,
T.
, and
Ion
,
S.
,
2008
, “
Generation-IV Nuclear Power: A Review of the State of the Science
,”
Elsevier Energy Policy
,
36
(
12
), pp.
4323
4330
.10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.059
2.
Kelly
,
J. E.
,
2014
, “
Generation IV International Forum: A Decade of Progress Through International Cooperation
,”
Prog. Nucl. Energy
,
77
, pp.
240
246
.10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.02.010
3.
Locatelli
,
G.
,
Mancini
,
M.
, and
Todeschini
,
N.
,
2013
, “
Generation IV Nuclear Reactors: Current Status and Future Prospects
,”
Elsevier Energy Policy
,
61
, pp.
1503
1520
.10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.101
4.
Forum Generation IV International
,
2014
,
Technology Roadmap Update for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems
, Forum Generation IV International,
Washington, DC
, p.
66
.
5.
El-Genk
,
M. S.
, and
Tournier
,
J.
,
2009
, “
Performance Analyses of VHTR Plants With Direct and Indirect Closed Brayton Cycles and Different Working Fluids
,”
Prog. Nucl. Energy
,
51
(
3
), pp.
556
572
.10.1016/j.pnucene.2008.11.004
6.
Wang
,
J.
, and
Gu
,
Y.
,
2005
, “
Parametric Studies on Different Gas Turbine Cycles for a High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor
,”
Elsevier J. Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
235
(
16
), pp.
1761
1772
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.02.007
7.
Gad-Briggs
,
A.
,
Pilidis
,
P.
, and
Nikolaidis
,
T.
,
2017
, “
Analyses of the Effect of Cycle Inlet Temperature on the Precooler and Plant Efficiency of the Simple and Intercooled Helium Gas Turbine Cycles for Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants
,”
Appl. Sci.
,
7
(
4
), pp.
319
338
.10.3390/app7040319
8.
Invernizzi
,
C. M.
,
2017
, “
Prospects of Mixtures as Working Fluids in Real-Gas Brayton Cycles
,”
Energies
,
10
(
10
), p.
15
.
9.
Ulizar Alvarez
,
J. I.
,
1998
, “
Simulation of Multi-Fluid Gas Turbines
,” Ph.D. thesis, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK.
10.
Gad-Briggs
,
A.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
,
2016
, “
Analyses of Simple and Intercooled Recuperated Direct Brayton Helium Gas Turbine Cycles for Generation IV Reactor Power Plants
,”
ASME J. Nucl. Eng. Radiat. Sci.
,
3
(
1
), p.
011017
.10.1115/1.4033398
11.
Gad-Briggs
,
A.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
,
2017
, “
Analyses of Off-Design Point Performances of Simple and Intercooled Brayton Helium Recuperated Gas Turbine Cycles
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE25-67714.10.1115/ICONE25-67714
12.
Osigwe
,
E. O.
,
Pilidis
,
P.
,
Nikolaidis
,
T.
, and
Sampath
,
S.
,
2017
,
GT-ACYSS: Gas Turbine Arekret-Cycle Simulation Tool for Training and Educational Purposes, Working Paper
,
Cranfield University
, Cranfield, UK.
13.
Lee
,
J. C.
,
Campbell
,
J.
, and
Wright
,
D. E.
,
1981
, “
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbine Working Fluids
,”
ASME J. Gas Turbine Eng. Power
,
103
(
1
), pp.
220
228
.10.1115/1.3230701
14.
Robinson
,
S. T.
,
1957
, “
Influence of Working-Fluid Characteristics on the Design of the Closed-Cycle Gas Turbine
,”
ASME
Paper No. 57-GTP-13. 10.1115/57-GTP-13
15.
El-Genk
,
M. S.
, and
Tournier
,
J.
,
2009
, “
Effects of Working Fluid and Shaft Rotation Speed on the Performance of HTR Plants and the Size of CBC Turbo-Machine
,”
Elsevier J. Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
239
(
10
), pp.
1811
1827
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.06.006
16.
Jackson
,
A. J. B.
, and
Audus
,
H.
,
2000
, “
Gas Turbine Performance Using Carbon Dioxide as Working Fluid in Closed Cycle Operation
,”
ASME
Paper No. 2000-GT-0153.10.1115/2000-GT-0153
17.
Dostal
,
V.
,
2004
, “
A Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycle for Next Generation Nuclear Reactors
,” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
18.
Dyreby
,
J. J.
,
2014
, “
Modeling the Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycle With Recompression
,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
19.
Ainley
,
D. G.
, and
Barnes
,
J. F.
,
1966
, “
An Assessment of the Component Sizes of Nuclear Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines Using Argon and Helium
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
,
181
(9), pp.
156
162
.10.1243/PIME_CONF_1966_181_181_02
20.
Xing
,
L. Y.
, and
Lidsky
,
M. L.
,
1993
, “
Design of Closed-Cycle Helium Turbine Nuclear Power Plants
,”
ASME
Paper No. 93-GT-196. 10.1115/93-GT-196
21.
Alpy
,
N.
,
Cachon
,
L.
,
Haubensack
,
D.
,
Floyd
,
J.
,
Simon
,
N.
,
Gicquel
,
L.
,
Rodriguez
,
G.
,
Saez
,
M.
, and
Laffont
,
G.
,
2011
, “
Gas Cycle Testing Opportunity With ASTRID, the French SFR Prototype
,”
Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Symposium
, Boulder, CO, May 24–25, pp.
42
51
.
22.
Shirakura
,
T.
, and
Awano
,
S.
,
1977
, “
Thermodynamic Performances of Closed-Cycle Gas-Turbine
,”
JSME/ASME Joint Gas Turbine Congress
, Tokyo, Japan, May 22–27, pp. 260–270.
23.
Gordon
,
S.
, and
McBride
,
B. J.
,
1996
, “
Computer Program for Calculation of Complex Chemical Equilibrium and Applications—Part II
,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, Report No. NASA RP-1311.
24.
Shah
,
R. K.
, and
Sekulic
,
D. P.
,
2003
,
Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design
,
Wiley, Hoboken
,
NJ
, p.
976
.
25.
Kakac
,
S.
, and
Liu
,
H.
,
2002
,
Heat Exchangers Selection, Rating and Thermal Design
,
CPC Press
,
New York
, p.
520
.
26.
Crim
,
W. M.
,
Hoffmann
,
J. R.
, and
Manning
,
G. B.
,
1966
, “
The Compact AK Process Nuclear System
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
88
(
2
), pp.
127
138
.10.1115/1.3678495
27.
Walsh
,
P. P.
, and
Fletcher
,
P.
,
1998
,
Gas Turbine Performance
,
Blackwell Science
,
Oxford, UK
, p.
646
. pages.
28.
McDonald
,
C. F.
,
1978
, “
The Closed-Cycle Turbine- Present and Future Prospectives for Fossil and Nuclear Heat Sources
,”
ASME
Paper No. 78-GT-102. 10.1115/78-GT-102
29.
Bammert
,
K.
,
Rurik
,
J.
, and
Griepentrog
,
H.
,
1974
, “
Highlights and Future Development of Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines
,”
ASME J. Gas Turbine Eng. Power
,
96
(
4
), pp.
342
348
.10.1115/1.3445856
30.
McDonald
,
C. F.
,
1985
,
Large Closed Cycle Gas Turbine Plants, Sawyer's Gas Turbine Engineering Handbook
, Vol.
2
,
J. W.
Sawyer
, ed.,
Turbomachinery International Publications
,
Norwalk, CT
.
You do not currently have access to this content.