Abstract

A common opportunity for nuclear power plant operators is ensuring that routinely collected data are fully leveraged. Exploiting data analytics can enable improvements in anomaly detection and condition monitoring by identifying previously unseen data trends and correlations without major financial investment. One such opportunity is in facilitating the detection of fuel defects by augmenting the delayed neutron (DN) monitoring system deployed in the majority of Canada deuterium uranium (CANDU) reactors. In this paper, we demonstrate using archive data that the detection of fuel defects can be accelerated using this system in combination with the use of a deeper historical dataset and the introduction of a smoothing algorithm. The current defect identification process relies on the analysis of data of high variance and is subject to the judgment of a domain expert, resulting in variable defect identification periods. The proposed approaches seek to mitigate this and alleviate the variable identification time. Initial results presented here show that for an initial batch of 30 defects, identification periods can be meaningfully reduced compared to the current process, with defects potentially visible on an average of 11.4 days earlier. By shortening this identification period, fuel containing defects can be scheduled for earlier removal, reducing the risk of statutory shutdown obligations, protecting personnel, and promoting industry best practice. Exploring a historical dataset identifies previously undocumented trends and we discuss the potential to produce correlations with other reactor parameters. The application of this knowledge can lead to opportunities in the use of machine learning algorithms and, ultimately, more accurate predictions.

References

1.
Garland
,
W. J.
,
Chaplin
,
R.
,
Marleau
,
G.
,
Nichita
,
E.
,
Rouben
,
B.
,
Popov
,
N. K.
,
Hepburn
,
A.
,
Jiang
,
J.
,
Waller
,
E.
,
Snell
,
V.
,
Lister
,
D. H.
,
Cook
,
W. G.
,
Gacesa
,
M.
,
Tayal
,
M.
, and
Damario
,
D.
,
2014
,
The Essential CANDU
, 1st ed.,
University Network of Excellence in Nuclear Engineering
,
Hamilton, ON, Canada
.
2.
IAEA
,
2010
, “
Review of Fuel Failures in Water Cooled Reactors
,”
International Atomic Agency
,
Vienna, Nuclear Energy
Series No. NF-T-2.1
.https://www.iaea.org/publications/8259/review-of-fuel-failures-in-water-cooled-reactors
3.
AECL CANDU
,
1993
, “
Design Manual: Failed Fuel Channel Identification System (Delayed Neutron Monitor System)
,”
AECL CANDU
,
Mississauga, ON, Canada
, Report No. DM-21-63105.
4.
Lewis
,
B. J.
,
Chan
,
P. K.
,
El-Jaby
,
A.
,
Iglesias
,
F. C.
, and
Fitchett
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Fission Product Release Modelling for Application of Fuel-Failure Monitoring and Detection—An Overview
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
,
489
, pp.
64
83
.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.03.037
5.
Lipsett
,
J. J.
, and
Tseng
,
C. M.
,
1976
, “
Delayed-Neutron Systems for Failed Fuel Location in CANDU Reactors
,”
IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.
,
23
(
1
), pp.
325
330
.10.1109/TNS.1976.4328265
6.
Schmeing
,
H.
, and
Hogg
,
C.
,
2005
, “
The Bruce B Delayed Neutron (DN) Monitoring System for Failed Fuel Detection: Twenty Years of Operating Experience
,”
Recent Improvement and Planned Upgrades
,
Tiverton, ON, Canada
, Report.
7.
MacDonald
,
R. D.
,
Floyd
,
M. R.
,
Lewis
,
B. J.
,
Manzer
,
A. M.
, and
Truant
,
P. T.
,
1990
, “
Detecting, Locating and Identifying Failed Fuel in Canadian Power Reactors
,”
Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories
,
Chalk River, ON, Canada
,
Report No. AECL-9714
. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0334/ML033450220.pdf
8.
Manzer
,
A. M.
,
Sejnoha
,
R.
,
Steed
,
R.
,
Whynot
,
T.
,
Graham
,
N.
,
Barr
,
A.
, and
Carter
,
T.
,
1992
, “
Fuel Defect Investigation at Point Lepreau
,”
Third International Conference on CANDU Fuel,
Canadian Nuclear Society
,
Chalk River, ON, Canada
, Oct. 4–8, pp.
30
43
.https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:25064369
9.
Park
,
H.
,
Manzer
,
A. M.
,
Palleck
,
S.
, and
Love
,
J.
,
1997
, “
Fuel Defect Root Cause Investigation at Wolsong-1
,”
Fifth International Conference on CANDU Fuel
,
Toronto, ON, Canada
pp.
21
25
.https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/20043916
10.
Gheorghiu
,
E.
, and
Gheorghiu
,
C.
,
2007
, “
Defected Fuel Monitoring at Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant
,”
Nuclear Energy for New Europe, Nuclear Society of Slovenia
,
Portoroz, Slovenia
,
Report No. 506
.https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:34028225
11.
Fatima
,
T.
,
Scientist
,
P.
,
Qasim
,
K. G.
, and
Engineer
,
P.
,
2002
, “
KANUPP Fuel Performance and Operational Experience
,” International Conference on WWER Fuel Performance,
Modelling and Experimental Support
,
Albena, Bulgaria
, Sept. 19–23,
Paper No. INIS-BG--1077
. https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:37098315
12.
Graham
,
R.
, and
Stevens
,
J.
,
1974
, “
Experience With CANDU Reactors Outside of Canada
,”
Toronto, ON, Canada
,
Report No. CNA-74-203
.https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/06/160/6160925.pdf
13.
Livingstone
,
S. J.
,
2012
, “
Development of an On-Line Fuel Failure Monitoring System for CANDU Reactors
,”
Ph.D. thesis
,
Royal Military College of Canada
,
Kingston, ON, Canada
.https://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/thesescanada/vol2/002/NR83407.PDF
14.
Fitchett
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Assessing the Impact of Transport Time Between Failed Fuel and Delayed Neutron Detectors in CANDU Reactors
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Royal Military College of Canada
,
Kingston,ON, Canada
.
15.
Page
,
E.
,
1954
, “
Continuous Inspection Schemes
,”
Biometrika
,
41
(
1–2
), pp.
100
115
.10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100
16.
Huang
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Xu
,
B.
,
Wu
,
Z.
, and
Chambers
,
J. A.
,
2018
, “
A New Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter for Cooperative Localization
,”
IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst.
,
54
(
1
), pp.
353
368
.10.1109/TAES.2017.2756763
17.
Gardner
,
E.
,
1985
, “
Exponential Smoothing: The State of the Art
,”
Int. J. Forecasting
,
4
(
1
), pp.
1
28
.10.1002/for.3980040103
You do not currently have access to this content.