Abstract

This article gives an impact analysis of utilization of nuclear power plant full scope simulator on operation parameters, training and education in nuclear power plant Krško (NEK). The Slovenian Nuclear Safety Administration issued their simulator decree to NEK in April 1995. The first training session on the simulator was performed in April 17, 2000 and since then the simulator has been used on daily bases to improve operator knowledges, skills, and performances. At the time, this was the first full scope simulator with the capability to simulate Beyond design basis accidents (severe accidents). The ability to simulate core meltdown and containment breach made it very suitable for emergency preparedness drills. After the 2017 simulator upgrade, fuel meltdown in the spent fuel pool can be simulated using the Modular Accident Analysis Program—MAAP5. This capability is still unique for full scope simulators even today. The simulator is also used for pretesting of plant modifications before their implementation on site or for just-in-time training for infrequent performed evolutions or for procedure development and testing. The Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group used the NEK simulator in 2018 to develop the new set of the Severe Accident Management Guidelines, incorporated with a completely new usage approach. In all of these years, the simulator has been actively participating in the increased reliability and stability of the electricity production and in achieving NEK's vision to be a worldwide leader in nuclear safety and excellence.

References

1.
United States Congress House Committee on Science and Astronautics
,
1970
, “
The Apollo 13 Accident, Hearings Before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives
,”
Ninety-First Congress, Second Session
,
Washington
, June 16, No. 19.
2.
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
2004
, “
Use of Control Room Simulators for Training of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel
,”
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
Vienna, Austria
, Report No.
IAEA-TECDOC-1411, p. 2.
3.
International Atomic Energy Agency, Power Reactor Information System (PRIS)
,
2021
, “
Energy Availability Factor for Years 2017-2019
,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, accessed Jan. https://pris.iaea.org/PRIS/WorldStatistics/ThreeYrsEnergyAvailabilityFactor.aspx
4.
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
1992
, “
Simulators for Training Nuclear Power Plant Personnel (Report Prepared Within the Framework of the IWG on Nuclear Power Plant Control and Instrumentation)
,” International Atomic Energy Agency,
Vienna, Austria
, Report No. IAEA-TECDOC-685, p.
34
.
5.
American Nuclear Society/American National Standards Institute, Inc.
,
2019
, “
Nuclear Power Plant Simulators for Use in Operator Training and Examination
,” American Nuclear Society, Report No. Ansi/Ans-3.5-2018, p. 3.
6.
Nuclear power plant Krško,
2009
, “
Initial Licensed Operator Training Program
,”
NEK, Krško
, Report No. TRG-13.151.
7.
Nuclear power plant Krško
,
2017
, “
Continuous Licensed Operator Training Program
,”
NEK, Krško
, Report No. TRG-13.152, p.
8
.
8.
Electric Power Research Institute,
2017
, “Modular Accident Analysis Program 5 (MAAP5) Applications Guidance: Desktop Reference for Using MAAP5 Software—Phase 3 Report,” EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, Report No.
3002001785
.https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1319/ML13190A201.pdf
9.
IAEA
,
2004
, “
Use of Control Room Simulators for Training of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel
,” International Atomic Energy Agency,
Vienna, Austria
, Report No.
IAEA-TECDOC-1411
, p.
16
.https://wwwpub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/te_1411_web.pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.