The relationship between strength and fatigue reliability of an offshore platform is an important aspect in the setting of appropriate structural inspection programs, as well as providing valuable information when considering the life extension of ageing offshore structures. This paper uses the example of a braced monopod to examine the interaction between strength and fatigue reliability for shallow-water platforms subjected to wave climates typical of the North West Shelf of Australia. The central role played by the local wave climate in both the strength and fatigue response of the structure is investigated. The probability of fatigue failure at the critical location was found to be approximately three orders of magnitude less than the overall probability of storm overload failure. This inequity between strength and fatigue reliability raises the possibility of redirecting inspection effort toward higher-risk threats such as accidental damage and corrosion. The potential for further optimizing the total life-cycle costs of new offshore structures is also briefly discussed.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
fatigue, structural engineering, corrosion fatigue, remaining life assessment, failure (mechanical), ocean waves, environmental factors, offshore installations
Topics:
Failure, Fatigue, Reliability, Waves, Water, Design, Probability, Climate, Storms
1.
Byers
,
W. G.
,
Marley
,
M. J.
,
Mohammadi
,
J.
,
Nielsen
,
R. J.
, and
Sarkani
,
S.
,
1997
, “
Fatigue Reliability Reassessment Procedures: State-of-the-Art-Paper
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
,
123
(
3
), pp.
271
–
285
.
2.
Ronalds, B. F., Anthony, N. R., Tuty, S., and Fakas, E., 2000, “Monopod Structural Reliability Under Storm Overload,” Proceedings of the 20th International Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, OMAE00-6124, ASME, New Orleans, LA.
3.
API, 1993, “Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design,” API RP2A-WSD, 20th edition.
4.
HSE, 1990, “Offshore Installations: Guidance on Design, Construction and Certification,” 4th edition, U.K. Department of Energy/Health and Safety Executive, HMSO, London.
5.
HSE, 1999, “Assessment of the Historical Development of Fixed Offshore Structure Design Codes,” Offshore Technology Report-OTO 1999 015, U.K. Health and Safety Executive.
6.
NPD, 1998, “Regulations Relating to Loadbearing Structures in the Petroleum Activities,” The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Stavanger, Norway.
7.
Va˚rdal, O. T., Moan, T., and Bjørheim, L. G., 2000, “Application of Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis for Reassessment of Fatigue Life of a Floating Production Unit—Philosophy and Target Levels,” Proceedings of the 20th International Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, OMAE00-2078, ASME, New Orleans, LA.
8.
WNI, 1994, “Oceanographic and Meteorological Design Criteria—Wandoo Location, Report No. R590,” WNI Science & Engineering.
9.
Visser, W., 1993, “The Structural Design of Offshore Jackets,” Marine Technology Directorate Publication 94/100, MTD, London.
10.
Bucknell, J., 2000, “Defect Assessment for Existing Marine Pipelines,” Proceedings of APEC Workshop on Assessing and Maintaining the Integrity of Existing Offshore Oil and Gas Facilities, October 2000, Beijing, China.
11.
Tuty, S., Ronalds, B. F., Harding, J. R., and Fakas, E., 2001, “Storm Overload Response of North West Shelf Monopods,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Safety, Risk, and Reliability—Trends in Engineering, IABSE, Malta.
12.
Melchers, R. E., 1987, “Structural Reliability, Analysis, and Prediction,” Ellis Horwood, Chichester.
13.
Efthymiou, M., van de Graaf, J. W., Tromans, P. S., and Hines, I. M., 1996, “Reliability Based Criteria for Fixed Steel Offshore Platforms,” Proceedings of the 15th International Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, ASME, Florence, Italy, 1, pp. 129–141.
14.
IIW, 1999, “Recommended Fatigue Design Procedure for Welded Hollow Section Joints,” IIW Doc. XIII-1804-99, International Institute of Welding.
15.
Wirsching
,
P. H.
,
1984
, “
Fatigue Reliability for Offshore Structures
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
,
110
(
10
), pp.
2340
–
2356
.
16.
Xu, T., Bea, R. G., Ramos, R., Valle, O., and Valdes, V., 1999, “Uncertainties in the Fatigue Lives of Tubular Joints,” Proceedings of the 31st Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 10849, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston, TX.
17.
Bea, R. G., 1990, “Reliability Based Design Criteria for Coastal and Ocean Structures,” National Committee on Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Institution of Engineers, Australia.
18.
Moan, T., Va˚rdal, O. T., and Johannesen, J. M., 1999, “Probabilistic Inspection Planning of Fixed Offshore Structures,” Proceedings of the ICASP 8 Conference, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, December 12–15, 1999.
19.
Florentino, S., and Valle, O., 1998, “Optimal Inspection Scheduling Methodology for Fixed Offshore Structures Based on Reliability Analysis,” Proceedings of the 17th International Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, OMAE98-1212, ASME, Lisbon, Portugal.
20.
Barton A., and Descamps B., 2000, “Risk-Based Inspection Planning Applied to 14 Steel Jacket Structures in Bass Strait, Australia—Case Study,” Proceedings of the 10th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference (ISOPE), Seattle, WA.
21.
Karsan
,
D. I.
, and
Kumar
,
A.
,
1990
, “
Fatigue Failure Paths for Offshore Platform Inspection
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
,
116
(
6
), pp.
1679
–
1695
.
22.
Karamchandani
,
A.
,
Dalane
,
J. I.
, and
Bjerager
,
P.
,
1992
, “
Systems Reliability Approach to Fatigue of Structures
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
,
118
(
3
), pp.
684
–
700
.
Copyright © 2003
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.