The response of a combined dynamic system consisting of a Spar, a mooring line system, and top tension risers is presented. The top tension of a riser is provided by a buoyancy-can that is laterally supported by a preloaded compliant guide. The overall system is nonlinear due to the mooring line restoring force, the friction between the buoyancy-cans and the compliant guides, and the friction between the risers and the guides at the Spar keel. The friction between the Spar and the riser system is captured by a Coulomb model, whereas the stiffness of the mooring line system is accounted for by using a nonlinear regression analysis of pertinent load versus displacement data. The combined model is numerically integrated using input time histories of force and moment that are compatible with a random representation (Jonswap spectrum) of a typical extreme environmental loading in the Gulf of Mexico. The input time histories of the force and the moment for the combined model are obtained at the center of gravity of the Spar by using a standard motion analysis program (MLTSIM). The numerical results of the time domain analysis of the combined model, in conjunction with ergodicity, are used for an associated Monte Carlo study. The Monte Carlo study provides useful information regarding the probability densities and the power spectra of various response components of the combined system. These results serve as a benchmark for additional analytical studies that call attention to the potential usefulness of the technique of statistical linearization for efficient dynamic analyses of preliminary design decisions regarding the combined Spar–Risers–Mooring lines system.

1.
Ran
,
Z.
,
Kim
,
M. H.
, and
Zheng
,
W.
,
1999
, “
Coupled Dynamic Analysis of a Moored Spar in Random Waves and Currents (Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain Analysis)
,”
Trans. ASME
,
121
, pp.
194
200
.
2.
Ran
,
Z.
, and
Kim
,
M. H.
,
1997
, “
Nonlinear Coupled Responses of a Tethered Spar Platform in Waves
,”
Int. J. Offshore and Polar Eng.
,
7
, pp.
111
118
.
3.
Gupta, H., Finn, L., and Weaver, T., 2000, “Effects of Spar Coupled Analysis,” Proceedings of the Offshore Technological conference, Vol. 2, pp. 629–638.
4.
Spanos, P. D., Ghosh, R., Finn, L. D., and Halkyard, J. E., 2002, “Stochastic Dynamic Analysis of a Spar Structure Coupled With Top Tensioned Risers and Mooring Lines,” 4th International Conference on Computational Stochastic Mechanics, Corfu, Greece, pp. 583–589.
5.
Pauling, J. Randolph, Inc., 1995, “MLTSIM: Time Domain Platform Simulation for Floating Platform Consisting of Multiple Interconnected Bodies,” Geyserville, California.
6.
Mekha, B. B., Johnson, C. P., and Roesset, J. M., 1995, “Nonlinear Response of a Spar in Deep Water,” Proceedings of the 5th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Vol. 3, The Hauge, ISOPE, pp. 462–469.
7.
Ran
,
Z.
,
Kim
,
M. H.
,
Niedzwecki
,
J. M.
, and
Johnson
,
R. P.
,
1995
, “
Responses of a Spar Platform in Random Waves and Currents (Experiment vs. Theory)
,”
Int. J. Offshore and Polar Eng.
,
6
, pp.
27
34
.
8.
Chakrabarti, S. K., 1987, Nonlinear Methods in Offshore Engineering, Elsevier Science, New York.
9.
Sarpkaya, T., and Issacson, M., 1981, Mechanics of Wave Forces on Offshore Structures, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
10.
Roberts, J. B., and Spanos, P. D., 1990, Random Vibrations and Statistical Linearizations, Wiley, New York, 2003.
11.
Donley
,
M. G.
, and
Spanos
,
P. D.
,
1991
, “
Stochastic Response of a Tension Leg Platform to Viscous Drift Force
,”
J. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME
,
113
, pp.
148
155
.
12.
Spanos
,
P. D.
, and
Donley
,
M. G.
,
1991
, “
Equivalent Statistical Quadratization for Nonlinear System
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
,
117
, pp.
1289
1310
.
You do not currently have access to this content.