The accuracy of two integration algorithms is studied for the common engineering condition of a von Mises, isotropic hardening model under plane stress. Errors in stress predictions for given total strain increments are expressed with contour plots of two parameters; an angle in the pi-plane and the difference between the exact and computed yield surface radii. The two methods are the tangent predictor-radial return approach and the elastic predictor-radial corrector algorithm originally developed by Mendelson. The accuracy of a combined tangent predictor-radial corrector algorithm is also investigated. For single-step constant-strain-rate increments the elastic predictor-radial corrector method is generally the most accurate, although errors in angle can be significant. The use of a simple subincrementation formula with any one of the three approaches yields results that would be acceptable for most engineering problems.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 1979
Research Papers
Accurate Numerical Solutions for Elastic-Plastic Models
H. L. Schreyer,
H. L. Schreyer
Reactor Analysis and Safety Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill. 60439
Search for other works by this author on:
R. F. Kulak,
R. F. Kulak
Reactor Analysis and Safety Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill. 60439
Search for other works by this author on:
J. M. Kramer
J. M. Kramer
Reactor Analysis and Safety Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill. 60439
Search for other works by this author on:
H. L. Schreyer
Reactor Analysis and Safety Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill. 60439
R. F. Kulak
Reactor Analysis and Safety Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill. 60439
J. M. Kramer
Reactor Analysis and Safety Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill. 60439
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. Aug 1979, 101(3): 226-234 (9 pages)
Published Online: August 1, 1979
Article history
Received:
April 2, 1979
Online:
October 25, 2010
Connected Content
A correction has been published:
Erratum: “Accurate Numerical Solutions for Elastic-Plastic Models” (Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 1979, 101, pp. 226–234)
Citation
Schreyer, H. L., Kulak, R. F., and Kramer, J. M. (August 1, 1979). "Accurate Numerical Solutions for Elastic-Plastic Models." ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. August 1979; 101(3): 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3454627
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Statistical Characteristic of the Transition Temperature Shift for Reactor Pressure Vessel Steel
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Master Curve Evaluation Using the Fracture Toughness Data at Low Temperature of T-T0 < −50°C
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Mach Number Correction of Rectangular Duct Criticals
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Optimization of High-Vapor Pressure Condensate Pipeline Commissioning Schemes in Large Uplift Environments
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Related Articles
On the Generation of Tuned Test Problems for Stress Concentrations Induced by Shear Tractions
J. Verif. Valid. Uncert (December,2024)
Pressure Sensitive Nonassociative Plasticity Model for DRA Composites
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April,2007)
Study of Integration Strategy for Thermal-Elastic-Plastic Models
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,1992)
Time Integration Algorithm for a Cyclic Damage Coupled Thermo-Viscoplasticity Model for 63Sn-37Pb Solder Applications
J. Electron. Packag (March,2004)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
A Novel Approach for LFC and AVR of an Autonomous Power Generating System
International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Technology (ICMET-London 2011)
Estimation of K Ic from Slow Bend Precracked Charpy Specimen Strength Ratios
Developments in Fracture Mechanics Test Methods Standardization
CMA1-2 Based on Coordinate Transformation
International Conference on Electronics, Information and Communication Engineering (EICE 2012)