Using closed-form and finite element solutions derived in Part I of this paper together with a standard commercial finite element structural-analysis computer program, the joint and cross acceptances for tubes and beams with different boundary conditions are calculated as a function of the correlation length up to 10 times the length of the structures. The results are presented in the form of charts. Steps are given to show how to use these charts together with standard commercial finite-element structural-analysis computer programs to estimate the responses of single and multi-span tubes and beams to cross-flow turbulence-induced vibration. The importance of cross-modal coupling for multi-supported beams is investigated. Examples are given. [S0094-9930(00)03303-5]

1.
Au-Yang
,
M. K.
,
2000
, “
Joint and Cross Acceptances for Cross Flow-Induced Vibration Part I—Theoretical and Finite-Element Formulations
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
122
, pp.
349
354
.
2.
Powell
,
A.
,
1958
, “
On the Fatigue Failure of Structures due to Vibrations Excited by Random Pressure Fields
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
,
30
, No.
12
, pp.
1130
1135
.
3.
Au-Yang
,
M. K.
,
1987
, “
Development of Stabilizers for Steam Generator Tube Repair
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
107
, pp.
189
197
.
4.
Au-Yang
,
M. K.
,
1986
, “
Turbulent Buffeting of a Multi-Span Tube Bundle
,”
ASME J. Vib. Acoust. Stress, Reliab. Des.
,
108
, pp.
150
154
.
5.
Pettigrew, M. J., and Gorman, D. J., 1981, “Vibration of Heat Exchanger Tube Bundles in Liquid and Two-Phase Cross Flow,” Flow-Induced Vibration Design Guidelines, Chen, P. Y., ed., pp. 89–110. ASME PVP-Vol. 52.
You do not currently have access to this content.