The analysis of the elastic stresses in high-energy piping systems is a routine calculation in the power and petrochemical industries. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B31.1 Power Piping Code was developed for safe design and construction of pressure piping. Postconstruction issues, such as stress relaxation effects and selection of maximum expected creep damage locations, are not addressed in the Code. It has been expensive and time consuming to evaluate creep relaxation stresses in high energy piping systems, such as main steam and hot reheat piping. After prolonged operation of high-energy piping systems at elevated temperatures, it is very difficult to evaluate the redistribution of stresses due to dead weight, pressure, external loading, and thermal loading. The evaluation of stress relaxation and redistribution is especially important when nonideal conditions, such as bottomed-out or topped-out hangers, exist in piping systems. This paper uses three-dimensional four-node quadrilateral shell elements in the ABAQUS finite element code to evaluate the time for relaxation and the nominal relaxation stress values for a portion of a typical high-energy piping system subject to an ideally loaded hanger or to an overloaded hanger. The stress relaxation results are evaluated to suggest an approximation using elastic stress analysis results. [S0094-9930(00)01304-4]

1.
Hibbitt Karlsson & Sorenson, Inc., ABAQUS Finite Element Code, Version 5.6, Providence, RI.
2.
SST Systems, Inc., “CAEPIPE Computer Code User’s Manual,” Revision 20, Version 3.74.
3.
Finnie
,
I.
, and
Shirmohamadi
,
M.
,
1990
, “
Creep Deflection of Thick-Walled Piping Due to Combined Bending and Internal Pressure
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
112
, pp.
251
255
.
4.
Shirmohamadi, M., Ridgely, J., and Finnie, I., 1996, “Creep Relaxation Behavior of High Temperature Pressure Vessels,” ASME PVP-Vol. 336, pp. 267–271.
5.
Boyle
,
J. T.
, and
Spence
,
J.
,
1976
, “
Comparison of Approximate Methods for Estimation of the Creep Relaxation of a Curved Pipe
,”
J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
4
, pp.
221
252
.
6.
Workman, G. H., and Rodabaugh, E. C., 1974, “Simplified Second Stage Creep/Relaxation Analysis of Moderately Complex Spatially Three-Dimensional Piping Systems,” ASME Paper No. 74-PVP-27, pp. 1–9.
7.
Nakamura, K., and Boyle, J. T., 1986, “Approximate Methods for the Estimation of Elastic Follow-up in High Temperature Piping Systems,” Proc. International Conference on Creep, pp. 501–507.
8.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code for Pressure Piping, B31.1, 1995 Edition, New York, NY.
9.
American Standards Association Code for Pressure Piping, B31.1, 1955 Edition, New York, NY.
10.
Roark, R. J., and Young, W. C., 1975, Formulas for Stress and Strain, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, p. 504.
11.
Cane, B. J., and Townsend, R. D., 1983, “Prediction of Remaining Life in Low-Alloy Steels,” Flow and Fracture at Elevated Temperatures, American Society for Metals, pp. 279–316.
12.
Bailey
,
R. W.
,
1956
, “
Creep Relationships and Their Application to Pipes, Tubes, and Cylindrical Parts Under Internal Pressure
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part H
,
164
, pp.
425
431
.
13.
Cohn, M. J., 1995, “Prediction of Creep Life Exhaustion in High Energy Piping System Girth Welds,” ASME PVP-Vol. 315, pp. 221–228.
14.
Cohn
,
M. J.
,
1990
, “
Remaining Life of High-Energy Piping Systems Using Equivalent Stress
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
112
, pp.
260
265
.
You do not currently have access to this content.