This paper presents simulations of a loosely supported cantilever tube subjected to turbulence and fluidelastic instability forces. Several time domain fluid force models are presented to simulate the damping-controlled fluidelastic instability mechanism in tube arrays. These models include a negative damping model based on the Connors equation, fluid force coefficient-based models (Chen, 1983, “Instability Mechanisms and Stability Criteria of a Group of Cylinders Subjected to Cross-Flow. Part 1: Theory,” Trans. ASME, J. Vib., Acoust., Stress, Reliab. Des., 105, pp. 51–58; Tanaka and Takahara, 1981, “Fluid Elastic Vibration of Tube Array in Cross Flow,” J. Sound Vib., 77, pp. 19–37), and two semi-analytical models (Price and Païdoussis, 1984, “An Improved Mathematical Model for the Stability of Cylinder Rows Subjected to Cross-Flow,” J. Sound Vib., 97(4), pp. 615–640; Lever and Weaver, 1982, “A Theoretical Model for the Fluidelastic Instability in Heat Exchanger Tube Bundles,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 104, pp. 104–147). Time domain modeling and implementation challenges for each of these theories were discussed. For each model, the flow velocity and the support clearance were varied. Special attention was paid to the tube/support interaction parameters that affect wear, such as impact forces and normal work rate. As the prediction of the linear threshold varies depending on the model utilized, the nonlinear response also differs. The investigated models exhibit similar response characteristics for the lift response. The greatest differences were seen in the prediction of the drag response, the impact force level, and the normal work rate. Simulation results show that the Connors-based model consistently underestimates the response and the tube/support interaction parameters for the loose support case.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 2010
Research Papers
Time Domain Models for Damping-Controlled Fluidelastic Instability Forces in Tubes With Loose Supports
Marwan Hassan,
Marwan Hassan
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of New Brunswick
, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Achraf Hossen
Achraf Hossen
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of New Brunswick
, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Marwan Hassan
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of New Brunswick
, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3, Canada
Achraf Hossen
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of New Brunswick
, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3, CanadaJ. Pressure Vessel Technol. Aug 2010, 132(4): 041302 (11 pages)
Published Online: July 21, 2010
Article history
Received:
October 23, 2009
Revised:
April 24, 2010
Online:
July 21, 2010
Published:
July 21, 2010
Citation
Hassan, M., and Hossen, A. (July 21, 2010). "Time Domain Models for Damping-Controlled Fluidelastic Instability Forces in Tubes With Loose Supports." ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. August 2010; 132(4): 041302. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001700
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
The Behavior of Elbow Elements at Pure Bending Applications Compared to Beam and Shell Element Models
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February 2025)
Related Articles
Passive Control of Seismic Response of Piping Systems
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2006)
Numerical Estimation of Fluidelastic Instability in Tube Arrays
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2010)
Added-Mass Effect in Modeling of Cilia-Based Devices for Microfluidic Systems
J. Vib. Acoust (April,2010)
Drag Reduction in Turbulent Flow With Polymer Additives
J. Fluids Eng (May,2009)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
CFD Simulations of a Mixed-flow Pump Using Various Turbulence Models
Mixed-flow Pumps: Modeling, Simulation, and Measurements
Antilock-Braking System Using Fuzzy Logic
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Applications
Introduction to Finite Element, Boundary Element, and Meshless Methods: With Applications to Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow