Abstract

In this paper, the Sherwood–Frost constitutive model was first used to simulate the stress response and deformation process of buried high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe subjected to surface load, where parameters in this model were obtained by fitting the results of uniaxial tensile tests with different rates and the pipe–soil model was conducted in abaqus. Apparent stress concentration and large deformation are observed in pipe cross section and are closely related to the magnitude and location of surface load. The increments of surface load and offset displacement have opposite effects on the mechanical behavior of pipes. Additionally, the location of the maximum stress appears to shift from the top or bottom to the left and right sides of the pipe cross section with the increment of surface load, and the region of peak hoop stress will show a decreasing trend of counterclockwise rotation. Then, based on stress failure criterion, the relationship between the ultimate bearing capacity of the pipe and the offset displacement was determined, which decided by the angle between the ground and the line connecting load center and cross section center of pipe. Finally, an offset of 0.6 m is a value of interest. When the offset between the load position and the pipe exceeds 0.6 m, the ultimate bearing capacity of the pipe will increase significantly with the increase of the offset. The results of the above research could provide the reference for the safety evaluation and maintenance strategy of gas polyethylene pipe under the surface load.

References

1.
Zha
,
S.
,
Lan
,
H.-Q.
, and
Huang
,
H.
,
2022
, “
Review on Lifetime Prediction of Polyethylene Pipes: Limitations and Trends
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
198
, p.
104663
.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104663
2.
Zha
,
S.
, and
Lan
,
H.-Q.
,
2021
, “
Fracture Behavior of Pre-Cracked Polyethylene Gas Pipe Under Foundation Settlement by Extended Finite Element Method
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
189
, p.
104270
.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104270
3.
Zha
,
S.
,
Lan
,
H.-Q.
,
Zhang
,
H.
, and
Wu
,
Y.
,
2020
, “
Quantitative Assessment of Damage in Buried Polyethylene Pipe Subjected to Land Subsidence
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
143
(
4
), p.
041801
.10.1115/1.4049047
4.
Fang
,
H.
,
Tan
,
P.
,
Du
,
X.
,
Li
,
B.
,
Yang
,
K.
, and
Zhang
,
Y.
,
2020
, “
Mechanical Response of Buried HDPE Double-Wall Corrugated Pipe Under Traffic-Sewage Coupling Load
,”
Tunnelling Underground Space Technol.
,
108
(
9
), p.
103664
.10.1016/j.tust.2020.103664
5.
Li
,
L.
,
Wen-Jin
,
G.
,
Da-Lang
,
T.
, and
Wen-Da
,
Y.
,
2020
, “
Mechanical Response of Buried Polyethylene Pipeline Beneath the Roadway and Its Influential Factors
,”
Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater.
,
21
(
4
), pp.
419
426
.10.1007/s42341-020-00195-y
6.
Wu
,
Y.
,
You
,
X.
, and
Zha
,
S.
,
2019
, “
Mechanical Behavior Analysis of Buried Polyethylene Pipe Under Land Subsidence
,”
Eng. Failure Anal.
,
108
, p.
104351
.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104351
7.
Liu
,
X.
,
Zhang
,
H.
,
Xia
,
M.
,
Wu
,
K.
,
Chen
,
Y.
,
Zheng
,
Q.
, and
Li
,
J.
,
2018
, “
Mechanical Response of Buried Polyethylene Pipelines Under Excavation Load During Pavement Construction
,”
Eng. Failure Anal.
,
90
, pp.
355
370
.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.03.027
8.
Iimura
,
S.
,
2004
, “
Simplified Mechanical Model for Evaluating Stress in Pipeline Subject to Settlement
,”
Constr. Build. Mater.
,
18
(
6
), pp.
469
479
.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.01.002
9.
Trickey
,
S. A.
, and
Moore
,
I. D.
,
2007
, “
Three-Dimensional Response of Buried Pipes Under Circular Surface Loading
,”
J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.
,
133
(
2
), pp.
219
223
.10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:2(219)
10.
Moghaddas Tafreshi
,
S. N.
, and
Khalaj
,
O.
,
2008
, “
Laboratory Tests of Small-Diameter HDPE Pipes Buried in Reinforced Sand Under Repeated-Load
,”
Geotext. Geomembr.
,
26
(
2
), pp.
145
163
.10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.06.002
11.
Moghaddas Tafreshi
,
S. N.
, and
Tavakoli Mehrjardi
,
G.
,
2008
, “
The Use of Neural Network to Predict the Behavior of Small Plastic Pipes Embedded in Reinforced Sand and Surface Settlement Under Repeated Load
,”
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.
,
21
(
6
), pp.
883
894
.10.1016/j.engappai.2007.09.001
12.
Moghaddas Tafreshi
,
S. N.
, and
Khalaj
,
O.
,
2011
, “
Analysis of Repeated-Load Laboratory Tests on Buried Plastic Pipes in Sand
,”
Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng.
,
31
(
1
), pp.
1
15
.10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.016
13.
Suleiman
,
M. T.
,
Brian
,
J.
, and
Coree
,
P. E.
,
2004
, “
Constitutive Model for High Density Polyethylene Material: Systematic Approach
,”
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
,
16
(
6
), pp.
511
515
.10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:6(511)
14.
Sherwood
,
J. A.
, and
Frost
,
C. C.
,
2010
, “
Constitutive Modeling and Simulation of Energy Absorbing Polyurethane Foam Under Impact Loading
,”
Polym. Eng. Sci.
,
32
(
16
), pp.
1138
1146
.10.1002/pen.760321611
15.
Naderi-Boldaji
,
M.
,
Alimardani
,
R.
,
Hemmat
,
A.
,
Sharifi
,
A.
,
Keyhani
,
A.
,
Tekeste
,
M. Z.
, and
Keller
,
T.
,
2013
, “
3D Finite Element Simulation of a Single-Tip Horizontal Penetrometer–Soil Interaction. Part I: Development of the Model and Evaluation of the Model Parameters
,”
Soil Tillage Res.
,
134
, pp.
153
162
.10.1016/j.still.2013.08.002
16.
Zha
,
S.
,
Wu
,
Y.
, and
Jin
,
P.
,
2019
, “
Reliability Analysis of Buried Polyethylene Pipeline Subject to Traffic Loads
,”
Adv. Mech. Eng.
,
11
(
10
), p.
168781401988378
.10.1177/1687814019883785
17.
Wu
,
Y.
,
Zha
,
S.
, and
Jin
,
P.
,
2019
, “
Finite Element Method Simulations to Study Factors Affecting Buried Pipeline Subjected to Debris Flow
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
141
(
2
), p.
021701
.10.1115/1.4042055
18.
Knappett
,
J. A.
, and
Craig
,
R. F.
,
2013
,
Craig's Soil Mechanics
, 8th ed.,
Spon Press, New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.