Accurate prediction of lifetime is an increasingly important issue for wind turbine rotor blade materials. Coupon tests with the variable-amplitude standard loading sequences for wind turbines known as WISPER and WISPERX have indicated that the coupon lifetime can be overestimated by one or two orders of magnitude using conventional lifetime prediction formulations. In the actual design, this might be compensated for by conservative design factors covering other aspects such as environmental conditions. These conventional lifetime prediction formulations use Rainflow counting of the load history, a log-log SN-curve (stress- or strain amplitude versus cycles to failure) for R = −1, a linear Goodman diagram as a constant-life diagram, and Miner summation. In this work, possible alternative fatigue formulations to improve lifetime prediction under variable-amplitude loading are investigated. Results of WISPER and WISPERX variable-amplitude tests on a material representative of wind turbine rotor blades are used. Only alternatives for the SN-curve and the constant-life diagram are investigated; Rainflow counting and Miner summation are used in all predictions discussed here. None of the investigated SN-curves unites an apparent correlation of constant-amplitude data with an accurate and/or conservative lifetime prediction, when including them in a classical linear Goodman diagram. However, the lin-log- and log-log SN-curves do yield better predictions in combination with an alternative constant-life diagram.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
wind turbines, nuclear collective model, fatigue testing
Topics:
Cycles, Fatigue, Stress, Wind turbines, Damage, Blades, Rotors, Failure
1.
Morel
,
F
.
2000
, “
A Critical Plane Approach for Life Prediction of High Cycle Fatigue Under Multiaxial Variable Amplitude Loading
,”
Int. J. Fatigue
22
, pp.
101
–
119
.
2.
Subramanian
,
S.
,
Reifsnider
,
K.L.
, and
Stinchcomb
,
W.W.
,
1995
, “
A Cumulative Damage Model to Predict the Fatigue Life of Composite Laminates Including the Effect of a Fiber-Matrix Interphase
,”
Int. J. Fatigue
,
17
, pp.
343
–
351
.
3.
Lee, L.J., Fu, K.E., and Yang, J.N., 1996, “Prediction of Fatigue Damage and Life for Composite Laminates Under Service Loading Spectra,” Composites Science and Technology, 56, pp. 635–648.
4.
Gamstedt, E.K., and Andersen, S.I., 2001, “Fatigue Degradation and Failure of Rotating Composite Structures – Materials Characterization and Underlying Mechanisms,” Risø Report nr. R-1261, Roskilde, Denmark.
5.
Wahl, N.K., 2001, “Spectrum Fatigue Lifetime and Residual Strength for Fiberglass Laminates,” Ph.D. thesis, Montana State Univ.
6.
Germanischer Lloyd, 1993, Rules and Regulations, IV-Non-Marine Technology, Part I: Wind Energy, Hamburg, Germany.
7.
van Delft, D.R.V., de Winkel, G.D., and Joosse, P.A., 1997, “Fatigue Behavior of Fiberglass Wind Turbine Blade Material Under Variable-Amplitude Loading,” AIAA Wind Energy Symposium, Paper No. AIAA-97-0951.
8.
Echtermeyer, A.T., Kensche, C.W., Bach, P., Poppen, M., Lilholt, H., Andersen, S.I., and Brøndsted, P., 1996, “Method to Predict Fatigue Lifetimes of GRP Wind Turbine Blades and Comparison with Experiments,” Proc. European Wind Energy Conf., pp. 907–913.
9.
Bond, I.P., 1999, “Fatigue Life Prediction for GRP Subjected to Variable Amplitude Loading,” Composites: Part A 30, pp. 961–970.
10.
de Jonge, J.B., 1983, “The Analysis of Load-Time Histories by Means of Counting Methods,” Subchapter 3.4 of AGARDograph No. 292 Helicopter Fatigue Design Guide, F. Liard (ed.), pp. 91–105.
11.
ten Have, A.A., 1992, “WISPER and WISPERX – Final Definition of Two Standardized Fatigue Loading Sequences for Wind Turbine Blades,” NLR TP 91476 U, NLR, The Netherlands.
12.
ten Have, A.A., 1993, “WISPER and WISPERX - A Summary Paper Describing Their Background, Derivation and Statistics,” 12th ASME Wind Energy Symp., NLR TP 92410 U, National Aerospace Laboratory, The Netherlands.
13.
ten Have, A.A., 1988, “WISPER: A Standardized Fatigue Load Sequence for HAWT-Blades,” Proc. of European Community Wind Energy Conf., pp. 448–452.
14.
Sutherland, H.J., 1999, “On the Fatigue Analysis of Wind Turbines,” Sandia National Laboratories, SAND99-0089.
15.
Kensche, C.W. (ed.), 1996, “Fatigue of Materials and Components for Wind Turbine Rotor Blades,” European Commission, Brussels.
16.
Rink, H.D., van Delft, D.R.V., and de Winkel, G.D., 1995, “Fatigue Behavior of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polyester for Wind Turbine Blades, Part 1: Fatigue Behavior at the Very High Cycle Range,” Stevin Report 6-94-30, Delft, The Netherlands.
17.
van Delft, D.R.V., and de Winkel, G.D., 1996, “Fatigue Behavior of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polyester for Wind Turbine Blades, Part 2: Fatigue Behavior Under the WISPER and WISPERX Variable Amplitude Loading,” Stevin Report 6-96-20, Delft, The Netherlands.
18.
Bach, P.W., 1992, “Fatigue Properties of Glass- and Glass/Carbon-Polyester Composites for Wind Turbines,” ECN C-92-072, ECN Petten, The Netherlands.
19.
Bach, P.W., 1994, “Fatigue Lifetime of Glass-Polyester Laminates for Wind Turbine Blades,” ECN C-94-20, ECN, Petten, The Netherlands.
20.
Mandell, J.F., and Samborsky, D.D., 1997,“DOE/MSU Composite Material Fatigue Database: Test Methods, Materials, and Analysis,” Report No. SAND97-3002, Sandia National Laboratories.
21.
Sutherland, H.J., and Veers, P.S., 2000, “The Development of Confidence Limits for Fatigue Strength Data,” Proc. ASME/AIAA Wind Energy, pp. 413–423.
22.
Lavoir
,
A.J.
,
Reifsnider
,
K.L.
,
Renshaw
,
A. J.
, and
Mitten
,
W. A.
,
2000
, “
Prediction of Stress-Rupture Life of Glass/Epoxy Laminates
,”
Int. J. Fatigue
22
, pp.
467
–
480
.
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.