Computer simulation tools used to predict the energy production of photovoltaic systems are needed in order to make informed economic decisions. These tools require input parameters that characterize module performance under various operational and environmental conditions. Depending upon the complexity of the simulation model, the required input parameters can vary from the limited information found on labels affixed to photovoltaic modules to an extensive set of parameters. The required input parameters are normally obtained indoors using a solar simulator or flash tester, or measured outdoors under natural sunlight. This paper compares measured performance parameters for three photovoltaic modules tested outdoors at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). Two of the three modules were custom fabricated using monocrystalline and silicon film cells. The third, a commercially available module, utilized triple-junction amorphous silicon cells. The resulting data allow a comparison to be made between performance parameters measured at two laboratories with differing geographical locations and apparatus. This paper describes the apparatus used to collect the experimental data, test procedures utilized, and resulting performance parameters for each of the three modules. Using a computer simulation model, the impact that differences in measured parameters have on predicted energy production is quantified. Data presented for each module includes power output at standard rating conditions and the influence of incident angle, air mass, and module temperature on each module’s electrical performance. Measurements from the two laboratories are in excellent agreement. The power at standard rating conditions is within 1% for all three modules. Although the magnitude of the individual temperature coefficients varied as much as 17% between the two laboratories, the impact on predicted performance at various temperature levels was minimal, less than 2%. The influence of air mass on the performance of the three modules measured at the laboratories was in excellent agreement. The largest difference in measured results between the two laboratories was noted in the response of the modules to incident angles that exceed 75deg.

1.
King
,
D. L.
,
Boyson
,
W. E.
, and
Kratochvil
,
J. A.
, 2002, “
Analysis of Factors Influencing the Annual Energy Production of Photovoltaic Systems
,” Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, New Orleans, LA, May 20–24, pp.
1356
1361
.
2.
Marion
,
B.
, 2002, “
A Method for Modeling the Current-Voltage Curve of a PV Module for Outdoor Conditions
,”
Prog. Photovoltaics
1062-7995
10
, pp.
205
214
.
3.
Marion
,
B.
,
Rummel
,
S.
, and
Anderberg
,
A.
, 2004, “
Current-Voltage Curve Translation by Bilinear Interpolation
,”
Prog. Photovoltaics
1062-7995
12
, pp.
593
607
.
4.
Nakajima
,
A.
,
Ichikawa
,
M.
,
Kondo
,
M.
,
Yamamoto
,
K.
,
Yamagishi
,
H.
, and
Tawada
,
Y.
, 2004, “
Spectral Effects of a Single-Junction Amorphous Silicon Solar Cell on Outdoor Performance
,”
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1
0021-4922 Part 1,
43
(
5A
), pp.
2425
2531
.
5.
Kroposki
,
B.
,
Marion
,
W.
,
King
,
D. L.
,
Boyson
,
W. E.
, and
Kratochvil
,
J.
, 2002, “
Comparison of Module Performance Characterization Methods for Energy Production
,” Paper No. NREL/TP-520-29245.
6.
Marion
,
B.
,
Kroposki
,
B.
,
Emergy
,
K.
,
del Cueto
,
J.
,
Myers
,
D.
, and
Osterwald
,
C.
, 1999, “
Validation of a Photovoltaic Module Energy Ratings Procedure at NREL
,” Paper No. NREL/TP-529-26909.
7.
Gay
,
C. F.
,
Rumberg
,
J. E.
, and
Wilson
,
J. H.
, 1982, “
AM-PM: All Day Module Performance Measurements
,” Proc. 16th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist’ Conf., San Diego, IEEE New York, pp.
1041
1046
.
8.
Firor
,
K.
, 1985, “
Rating PV Systems
,” Proc. 18th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, Las Vegas, NV, October, pp.
1443
1448
.
9.
Fanney
,
A. H.
,
Dougherty
,
B. P.
, and
Davis
,
M. W.
, 2002, “
Performance and Characterization of Building Integrated Photovoltaic Panels
,” Proc. 29th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, (CD-ROM) New Orleans, LA, May 20–24.
10.
Fanney
,
A. H.
,
Dougherty
,
B. P.
, and
Davis
,
M. W.
, 2001, “
Measured Performance of Building Integrated Photovoltaic Panels
,”
Sol. Energy
0038-092X,
123
, pp.
187
193
.
11.
Dougherty
,
B. P.
,
Fanney
,
A. H.
, and
Davis
,
M. W.
, 2005, “
Measured Performance of Building Integrated Photovoltaic Panels-Round 2
,”
Sol. Energy
0038-092X,
127
, pp.
314
323
.
12.
King
,
D. L.
,
Boyson
,
W. E.
, and
Kratochvil
,
J. A.
, 2004, “
Photovoltaic Array Performance Model
,” Sandia Report No. SAND 2004-3535.
13.
Davis
,
M. W.
,
Fanney
,
A. H.
, and
Dougherty
,
B. P.
, 2002, “
Evaluating Building Integrated Photovoltaic Performance Models
,” Proc. 29th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, (CD-ROM) New Orleans, LA, May 20–24.
14.
PV-Design Pro, 2000, Solar Design Studio, v4.0, Maui Solar Energy Software Corp., Haiku, HI.
15.
King
,
D. L.
,
Kratochvil
,
J. A.
, and
Boyson
,
W. E.
, 1997, “
Temperature Coefficients for PV Modules and Arrays: Measurement Methods, Difficulties, and Results
,” Proc. 26th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Anaheim, CA, September 29–October 3, pp.
1183
1186
.
16.
King
,
D. L.
, 1996, “
Photovoltaic Module and Array Performance Characterization Methods for All System Operating Conditions
,” Proc. NREL/SNL Photovoltaics Program Review, New York,
AIP Press
, Lakewood, CO, November 18–22, pp.
347
368
.
17.
King
,
D. L.
,
Kratochvil
,
J. A.
, and
Boyson
,
W. E.
, 1997, “
Measuring Solar Spectral and Angle-of-Incidence Effects on Photovoltaic Modules and Solar Irradiance Sensors
,” Proc. 26th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Anaheim, CA, September 29–October 3, pp.
1113
1116
.
18.
ASTM E 1036-02, “
Standard Test Methods for Electrical Performance of Nonconcentrator Terrestrial Photovoltaic Modules and Arrays Using Reference Cells
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 12.02.
19.
Myers
,
D. R.
, and
Emery
,
K.
, 2002, “
Terrestrial Solar Spectral Modeling Tools and Applications for Photovoltaic Devices
,” IEEE 2002, May 20–24, pp.
1683
1686
.
20.
Kasten
,
F.
, and
Young
,
T.
, 1989, “
Revised Optical Air Mass Tables and Approximation Formula
,”
Appl. Opt.
0003-6935
28
(
22
), pp.
4735
4738
.
21.
Duffie
,
J. A.
, and
Beckman
,
W. A.
, 1991,
Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes
,
John Wiley and Sons
, New York.
22.
Martin
,
N.
, and
Ruiz
,
J. M.
, 2005, “
Annual Angular Reflection Losses in PV Modules
,
Prog. Photovoltaics
1062-7995
13
, pp.
75
84
.
23.
King
,
D. L.
,
Kratochvil
,
J. A.
, and
Boyson
,
W. E.
, 1998, “
Field Experience with a New Performance Characterization Procedure for Photovoltaic Arrays
,” Proc. 2nd World Conference and Exhibition on Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion, Vienna, Austria, July 6–10.
24.
ASTM G 159-98, “
Standard Tables for References Solar Spectral at Air Mass 1.5: Direct Hemispherical for a 37° Tilted Surface
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 14.04.
25.
ASTM E 973-02, “
Determination of the Spectral Mismatch Parameter Between a Photovoltaic Device and a Photovoltaic Reference Cell
,” Annual book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 12.02.
26.
Whitfield
,
K.
, and
Osterwald
,
C. R.
, 2001, “
Procedure for Determining the Uncertainty of Photovoltaic Module Outdoor Electrical Performance
,”
Prog. Photovoltaics
1062-7995
9
, pp.
87
102
.
27.
Fanney
,
A. H.
, and
Dougherty
,
B. P.
, 2001, “
Building Integrated Photovoltaic Test Facility
,”
Sol. Energy
0038-092X
123
, pp.
200
210
.
You do not currently have access to this content.