The impact of atmospheric stability on vertical wind profiles is reviewed and the implications for power performance testing and site evaluation are investigated. Velocity, temperature, and turbulence intensity profiles are generated using the model presented by Sumner and Masson. This technique couples Monin-Obukhov similarity theory with an algebraic turbulence equation derived from the k-ϵ turbulence model to resolve atmospheric parameters u*, L, T*, and z0. The resulting system of nonlinear equations is solved with a Newton-Raphson algorithm. The disk-averaged wind speed u¯disk is then evaluated by numerically integrating the resulting velocity profile over the swept area of the rotor. Power performance and annual energy production (AEP) calculations for a Vestas Windane-34 turbine from a wind farm in Delabole, England, are carried out using both disk-averaged and hub height wind speeds. Although the power curves generated with each wind speed definition show only slight differences, there is an appreciable impact on the measured maximum turbine efficiency. Furthermore, when the Weibull parameters for the site are recalculated using u¯disk, the AEP prediction using the modified parameters falls by nearly 5% compared to current methods. The IEC assumption that the hub height wind speed can be considered representative tends to underestimate maximum turbine efficiency. When this assumption is further applied to energy predictions, it appears that the tendency is to overestimate the site potential.

1.
International Electrotechnical Commission
, 1998, “
Wind Turbine Generator Systems—Part 12: Wind Turbine Power Performance Testing
,” Technical Report No. IEC 61400-12.
2.
Frandsen
,
S.
,
Antoniou
,
I.
,
Hansen
,
J.
,
Kristensen
,
L.
,
Madsen
,
H.
,
Chaviaropoulos
,
B.
,
Douvikas
,
D.
,
Dahlberg
,
J.
,
Derrick
,
A.
,
Dunbabin
,
P.
,
Hunter
,
R.
,
Ruffle
,
R.
,
Kanellopoulos
,
D.
, and
Kapsalis
,
G.
, 2000, “
Redefinition Power Curve for More Accurate Performance Assessment of Wind Farms
,”
Wind Energy
1095-4244,
3
, pp.
81
111
.
3.
Antoniou
,
I.
,
Jorgensen
,
H.
,
Ormel
,
F.
,
Bradley
,
S.
,
von Hünerbein
,
S.
,
Emeis
,
S.
, and
Warmbier
,
G.
, 2003, “
On the Theory of SODAR Measurement Techniques
,” Technical Report No. Risø-R-1410(EN),
Risø National Laboratory
.
4.
Elliott
,
D.
, and
Cadogan
,
J.
, 1990, “
Effects of Wind Shear and Turbulence on Wind Turbine Power Curves
,”
European Community Wind Energy Conference
,
Madrid, Spain
.
5.
Hunter
,
R.
,
Pedersen
,
T.
,
Dunbabin
,
P.
,
Antoniou
,
I.
,
Frandsen
,
S.
,
Klug
,
H.
,
Albers
,
A.
, and
Lee
,
W.
, 2001, “
European Wind Turbine Testing Procedure Developments—Task 1: Measurement Method to Verify Wind Turbine Performance Characteristics
,” Technical Report No. Risø-R-1209(EN),
Risø National Laboratory
.
6.
Rohatgi
,
J.
, 1996, “
An Analysis of the Influence of Atmospheric Stability on Vertical Wind Profiles—Its Influence on Wind Energy and Wind Turbines
,”
Wind Eng.
0309-524X,
20
(
5
), pp.
319
332
.
7.
Sumner
,
J.
, and
Masson
,
C.
, 2005, “
A Turbulence-based Model for Resolving Velocity and Temperature Profiles in the Atmospheric Surface Layer
,” submitted to Wind Engineering, 2005.
8.
Högström
,
U.
, 1988, “
Non-dimensional Wind and Temperature Profiles in the Atmospheric Surface Layer: A Re-evaluation
,”
Boundary-Layer Meteorol.
0006-8314,
42
, pp.
55
78
.
9.
Högström
,
U.
, 1996, “
Review of Some Basic Characteristics of the Atmospheric Surface Layer
,”
Boundary-Layer Meteorol.
0006-8314,
78
, pp.
215
246
.
10.
Pahlow
,
M.
,
Parlange
,
M.
, and
Porté-Agel
,
F.
, 2001, “
On Monin-Obukhov Similarity in the Stable Atmospheric Boundary Layer
,”
Boundary-Layer Meteorol.
0006-8314,
99
, pp.
225
248
.
11.
Kaimal
,
J.
, and
Finnigan
,
J.
, 1994,
Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows
,
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, England
.
12.
Paulsen
,
C.
, 1970, “
The Mathematical Representation of Wind Speed and Temperature Profiles in the Unstable Atmospheric Surface Layer
,”
J. Appl. Meteorol.
0021-8952,
9
, pp.
857
861
.
13.
Panofsky
,
H. A.
, and
Brier
,
G. W.
, 1968, “
Some Applications of Statistics to Meteorology
,” Technical Report,
Penn State University
.
14.
Technical University of Denmark
, 2005, “
Database of Wind Characteristics
,” http://www.winddata.comhttp://www.winddata.com
15.
International Electrotechnical Commission
, 2003, “
Wind Turbine Generator Systems Part 121: Power Performance Measurements of Grid Connected Wind Turbines
,” Draft Technical Report No. IEC 61400-121.
16.
Manwell
,
J.
,
McGowan
,
J.
, and
Rogers
,
A.
, 2002,
Wind Energy Explained
,
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
,
Chichester, England
.
You do not currently have access to this content.