Abstract

Carbon particles can be used as catalyst in solar reactors where they serve as radiant absorbent and nucleation sites for the heterogeneous decomposition reaction. Unlike commonly used metal catalysts, carbon catalyst does not have durability problem and high cost. However, in order to achieve sustainable catalytic decomposition of feedstock over carbon catalysts at elevated temperatures, the surface area of the carbon particles must be maintained. A subsequent treatment of deactivated carbon samples with CO2 at about 1000 °C would increase the surface and would recover the original activity as catalyst. In a windowed solar reactor, carbon particles are directly exposed to the high flux irradiation providing efficient radiation heat transfer directly to the reaction site. Therefore, one of the key parameters to achieve higher conversion efficiencies in a solar reactor is the presence and transport of carbon particles. In this paper, a transient one-dimensional model is presented to describe the effect of carbon particle feeding on energy transport and temperature profile of a cavity-type solar receiver. The model was developed by dividing the receiver into several control volumes and formulating energy balance equations for gas phase, particles, and cavity walls within each control volume. Monte Carlo ray tracing method was used to determine the solar heat absorbed by particles and cavity walls, as well as the radiative exchange between particles and cavity walls. Model accuracy was verified by experimental work using a solar receiver where carbon particles were injected uniformly. Comparison of simulation results with the experimentally measured temperatures at three different locations on cavity receiver wall showed an average deviation of 3.81%. The model was then used to study the effect of carbon particle size and feeding rate on the heat transfer, temperature profile, and energy absorption of the solar receiver. Based on the simulation results, it was found that injection of carbon particles with a size bigger than 500 µm has no significant influence on heat transfer of the system. However, by reducing the particle size lower than 500 µm, temperature uniformity and energy absorption can be enhanced.

References

1.
Villafán-Vidales
,
H. I.
,
Arancibia-Bulnes
,
C. A.
,
Riveros-Rosas
,
D.
,
Romero-Paredes
,
H.
, and
Estrada
,
C. A.
,
2017
, “
An Overview of the Solar Thermochemical Processes for Hydrogen and Syngas Production: Reactors, and Facilities
,”
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
,
75
, pp.
894
908
.
2.
Stechel
,
E. B.
,
2019
, “
The Promise of Solar Thermochemical Technologies
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
141
(
2
), p.
020303
.
3.
Wang
,
B.
,
Li
,
L.
,
Pottas
,
J. J.
,
Bader
,
R.
,
Kreider
,
P. B.
,
Wheeler
,
V. M.
, and
Lipiński
,
W.
,
2020
, “
Thermal Model of a Solar Thermochemical Reactor for Metal Oxide Reduction
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
142
(
5
), p.
051002
.
4.
Ophoff
,
C.
,
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Moens
,
D.
,
2020
, “
Monte Carlo Ray Tracing-Coupled Computational Fluid Dynamic Modeling and Experimental Testing of a 1-kW Solar Cavity Receiver Radiated Via 7-kW HFSS
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
142
(
6
), p.
061003
.
5.
Abedini Najafabadi
,
H.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2018
, “
An Advanced Modeling and Experimental Study to Improve Temperature Uniformity of a Solar Receiver
,”
Energy
,
165
(
Part B
), pp.
984
998
.
6.
Patrianakos
,
G.
,
Kostoglou
,
M.
, and
Konstandopoulos
,
A. G.
,
2012
, “
Effect of Seeding on Hydrogen and Carbon Particle Production in a 10 MW Solar Thermal Reactor for Methane Decomposition
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
37
(
21
), pp.
16570
16580
.
7.
Abanades
,
S.
,
Kimura
,
H.
, and
Otsuka
,
H.
,
2015
, “
A Drop-Tube Particle-Entrained Flow Solar Reactor Applied to Thermal Methane Splitting for Hydrogen Production
,”
Fuel
,
153
, pp.
56
66
.
8.
Maag
,
G.
,
Lipiński
,
W.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Particle-Gas Reacting Flow Under Concentrated Solar Irradiation
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
52
(
21
), pp.
4997
5004
.
9.
Johnson
,
E. F.
,
Tarı
,
İ.
, and
Baker
,
D.
,
2021
, “
Radiative Heat Transfer in the Discrete Element Method Using Distance Based Approximations
,”
Powder Technol.
,
380
, pp.
164
182
.
10.
Ophoff
,
C.
,
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Moens
,
D.
,
2020
, “
A Numerical Study on Particle Tracking and Heat Transfer Enhancement in a Solar Cavity Receiver
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
180
, p.
115785
.
11.
Saade
,
E.
,
Bingham
,
C.
,
Clough
,
D. E.
, and
Weimer
,
A. W.
,
2012
, “
Dynamics of a Solar-Thermal Transport-Tube Reactor
,”
Chem. Eng. J.
,
213
, pp.
272
285
.
12.
Davis
,
D.
,
Jafarian
,
M.
,
Chinnici
,
A.
,
Saw
,
W. L.
, and
Nathan
,
G. J.
,
2019
, “
Thermal Performance of Vortex-Based Solar Particle Receivers for Sensible Heating
,”
Sol. Energy
,
177
, pp.
163
177
.
13.
Abedini Najafabadi
,
H. A.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2017
, “
Development of a Control Model to Regulate Temperature in a Solar Receiver
,”
Renew. Energy
,
111
, pp.
95
104
.
14.
Abedini Najafabadi
,
H.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2018
, “
Aperture Size Adjustment Using Model Based Adaptive Control Strategy to Regulate Temperature in a Solar Receiver
,”
Sol. Energy
,
159
, pp.
20
36
.
15.
Van Belle
,
L.
,
Van Rompay
,
S.
,
Uddin
,
M. H.
,
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Vleugels
,
J.
,
2018
, “
Design and Experimental Testing of a Carbon Feeder for a Solar Thermal Receiver
,”
3rd Thermal and Fluids Engineering Conference (TFEC)
,
Fort Lauderdale, FL
,
Mar. 4–7
, pp.
763
777
.
16.
Villafán-Vidales
,
H. I.
,
Arancibia-Bulnes
,
C. A.
,
Abanades
,
S.
,
Riveros-Rosas
,
D.
, and
Romero-Paredes
,
H.
,
2011
, “
Monte Carlo Heat Transfer Modeling of a Particle-Cloud Solar Reactor for SnO2 Thermal Reduction
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
133
(
4
), p.
041009
.
17.
Lu
,
Z.
,
Jafarian
,
M.
,
Arjomandi
,
M.
, and
Nathan
,
G. J.
,
2016
, “
Particle-Scale Investigation of Heat Transfer in Radiation-Driven Char Gasification
,”
Chem. Eng. Technol.
,
39
(
10
), pp.
1903
1911
.
18.
Jaya Krishna
,
D.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2013
, “
Numerical Investigation of Particle Deposition Inside Aero-Shielded Solar Cyclone Reactor: A Promising Solution for Reactor Clogging
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
40
, pp.
198
209
.
You do not currently have access to this content.