Abstract

Acoustic emission (AE) nondestructive testing was used to monitor fiberglass/epoxy I-beams. The experiment consisted of loading the I-beams in cantilever fashion with a hydraulic ram. While testing, AE waveforms were collected from the onset of loading to failure. After acquisition, the AE data from each test were filtered to include only data collected up to 50 % of the theoretical ultimate load for further analysis.

A Kohonen self-organizing map (SOM) was utilized to separate individual data points into failure mechanism clusters. Then a multiple linear regression analysis was performed using the percentage of hits associated with each failure mechanism along with the epoxy type to develop a prediction equation. The results of this analysis provided a prediction to within a 36.0 % error. A second analysis was performed utilizing a back-propagation neural network. The inputs to the network included a categorical variable for the epoxy type together with the amplitude frequencies from 30–100 dB. The optimized network contained two hidden layers having nine neurons apiece. Here the ultimate load prediction was within 48 lbf for a 9.5 % error. Thus, the back-propagation neural network produced far better results than the SOM/multiple linear regression, probably because of unwanted noise and perhaps nonlinearities in the data.

References

1.
Hoskin
,
B.
and
Baker
,
A.
,
Composite Materials for Aircraft Structures
,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
,
1986
, pp
1
7
.
2.
Kalloo
,
F. R.
,
Predicting Burst Pressures in Filament Wound Composite Pressure Vessels Using Acoustic Emission
, MSAE Thesis,
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
, Daytona Beach, FL,
1988
.
3.
Hill
,
E. v. K.
,
Walker
,
J. L.
, and
Rowell
,
G. H.
, “
Burst Pressure Prediction in Graphite-Epoxy Pressure Vessels Using Neural Networks and Acoustic Emission Amplitude Data
,”
Materials Evaluation
 0025-5327, Vol.
54
, No.
6
,
1996
, pp.
748
754
.
4.
Walker
,
J. L.
 II
, and
Hill
,
E. v. K.
, “
Back-propagation Neural Network for Predicting Ultimate Strengths of Unidirectional Graphite/Epoxy Tensile Specimens
,”
Advanced Performance Materials
 0929-1881, Vol.
3
, No.
1
,
1996
, pp.
75
83
.
5.
Fisher
,
M. E.
and
Hill
,
E. v. K.
, “
Burst Pressure Prediction of Filament Wound Composite Pressure Vessels Using Acoustic Emission
,”
Materials Evaluation
 0025-5327, Vol.
56
, No.
12
,
1998
, pp.
1395
1401
.
6.
Walker
,
J. L.
and
Hill
,
E. v. K.
, “
Acoustic Emission Methods: Short Course
,” presented at the
ASNT Spring Conference and 8th Annual Research Symposium
,
Orlando, FL
,
03
1999
, pp. 16, 20,
38
39
,
47
48
.
7.
Fatzinger
,
E. C.
,
Low Proof Load Prediction of Ultimate Strengths of Fiberglass/Epoxy I-Beams Using Acoustic Emission
, MSAE Thesis,
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
, Daytona Beach, FL,
2001
.
8.
Hill
,
E. v. K.
,
Israel
,
P. L.
, and
Knotts
,
G. L.
, “
Neural Network Prediction of Aluminum-Lithium Weld Strengths from Acoustic Emission Amplitude Data
,”
Materials Evaluation
 0025-5327, Vol.
51
, No.
9
,
1993
, pp.
1040
1045
, 1051.
9.
Neural Ware, Inc.,
Reference Guide NeuralWorks Professional II/Plus and NeuralWorks Explorer
,
1995
.
10.
Miller
,
R. K.
,
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Volume 5, Acoustic Emission Testing
,
American Society for Nondestructive Testing
,
1987
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.