The measurement of ultrasonic reflection has been used to study the contact between rough surfaces. An incomplete interface will reflect some proportion of an incident wave; this proportion is known as the reflection coefficient. If the wavelength is large compared with the width of the gaps in the plane of the interface then the reflection mechanism can be modeled by considering the interface as a spring. The proportion of the incident wave reflected (reflection coefficient) is then a function of the stiffness of the interface and the frequency of the ultrasonic wave. The sensitivity of the ultrasonic technique has been quantified using a simple model, from which the stiffness of individual gaps and contacts are calculated and their effect on the ultrasonically measured stiffness predicted. The reflection of ultrasound at a static interface between a rough, nominally flat aluminum plate and a rough, nominally flat hardened steel punch has been investigated. Plastic flow on first loading was evident, while repeated loading was largely elastic. However, subsequent cycles indicate a small amount of further plasticity and contact irreversibility. The effect of surface roughness on the resultant contact has also been investigated. A simple plastic contact model is described which allows prediction of the average size of the asperity contacts and their number. This model shows that the average size of the contacts remains constant over most of the loading whereas the number of contacts increases almost linearly. The contact stiffness has also been modeled with two well known elastic rough surface contact models. These models predicted a lower interface stiffness than was observed in the experiments. However they provide a useful way of interpreting the ultrasonically measured interface stiffness data.

1.
Tattersall
,
H. G.
,
1973
, “
The Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Technique as Applied to Adhesion Testing
,”
J. Appl. Phys., J. Phys. D
,
D6
, pp.
819
832
.
2.
Kendall
,
K.
, and
Tabor
,
D.
,
1971
, “
An Ultrasonic Study of the Area of Contact Between Stationary and Sliding Surfaces
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
323
, pp.
321
340
.
3.
Krolikowski
,
J.
,
Szczepek
,
J.
, and
Witczak
,
Z.
,
1989
, “
Ultrasonic Investigation of Contact Between Solids Under High Hydrostatic Pressure
,”
Ultrasonics
,
27
, pp.
45
49
.
4.
Krolikowski
,
J.
, and
Szczepek
,
J.
,
1991
, “
Prediction of Contact Parameters Using Ultrasonic Method
,”
Wear
,
148
, pp.
181
195
.
5.
Baik
,
J.-M.
, and
Thompson
,
R. B.
,
1984
, “
Ultrasonic Scattering from Imperfect Interfaces: A Quasi-Static Model
,”
J. Nondestruct. Eval.
,
4
, No.
3/4
, pp.
177
196
.
6.
Haines, N. F., 1980, “The Theory of Sound Transmission and Reflection at Contacting Surfaces,” Report Number, RD/B/N4744, Central Electricity Generating Board, Research Division, Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Berkeley, CA.
7.
Pialucha, T. P., 1992, “The Reflection Coefficient from Interface Layers in the NDT of Adhesive Joints,” Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College, University of London.
8.
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
,
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
, and
Cawley
,
P.
,
1996
, “
A Study of the Interaction between Ultrasound and a Partially Contacting Solid-Solid Interface
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
452
, pp.
2613
2628
.
9.
Thomas, T. R., and Sayles, R. S., 1977, “Stiffness of Machine Tool Joints: a Random-Process Approach,” ASME Paper 76-WA/Prod-23.
10.
Yoshioka
,
N.
, and
Scholz
,
C. H.
,
1989
, “
Elastic Properties of Contacting Surfaces Under Normal and Shear Loads 2. Comparison of Theory with Experiment
,”
J. Geophys. Res.
,
94
, pp.
17691
17700
.
11.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
, and
Williamson
,
J. B. P.
,
1966
, “
Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
295
, pp.
300
319
.
12.
Webster
,
M. N.
, and
Sayles
,
R. S.
,
1986
, “
A Numerical Model for the Elastic Frictionless Contact of Real Rough Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
108
, No.
3
, pp.
314
320
.
13.
Clark
,
A. V.
, and
Chaskelis
,
H. H.
,
1981
, “
Measurement of Ultrasound Reflected from Ultra-Thin Defects
,”
Ultrasonics
,
19
, pp.
201
207
.
14.
Angel
,
Y. C.
, and
Achenbach
,
J. D.
,
1985
, “
Reflection and Transmission of Elastic Waves by a Periodic Array of Cracks
,”
J. Appl. Mech.
,
52
, pp.
33
40
.
15.
Tada, H., Paris, P., and Irwin, G., 1973, The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Del Research Co., St. Louis.
16.
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
,
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
, and
Cawley
,
P.
,
1997
, “
A Study of the Transmission of Ultrasound Across Solid-Rubber Interfaces
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
,
101
, pp.
970
981
.
17.
Zeller, B. D., Kinloch, A. J., and Cawley, P., 1998, “Characterization of Epoxy-Coated Oxide Films Using Acoustic Microscopy,” Review of Progress in QNDE, D. O. Thompson, and D. E. Chimenti, eds., Plenum Press, New York.
18.
Bowden, F. P., and Tabor, D., 1950, “The Friction and Lubrication of Solids, Part I,” The International Series of Monographs on Physics, Oxford University Press, United Kingdom.
19.
Bowden, F. P., and Tabor, D., 1964, “The Friction and Lubrication of Solids, Part II,” The International Series of Monographs on Physics, Oxford University Press, United Kingdom.
20.
Johnson, K. L., 1985, Contact Mechanics, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press.
21.
Tabor, D., 1975, “Interaction Between Surfaces: Adhesion and Friction,” Surface Physics of Materials, II, chap. 10, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
22.
Johnson, K. L., 1976, “Adhesion at the Contact of Solids,” Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Proc. 4th IUTAM Congress, Amsterdam, p. 133.
23.
Woo
,
K. L.
, and
Thomas
,
T. R.
,
1980
, “
Contact of Rough Surfaces: A Review of Experimental Work
,”
Wear
,
58
, No.
2
, pp.
331
340
.
24.
Whitehouse
,
D. J.
, and
Archard
,
J. F.
,
1970
, “
The Properties of Random Surfaces of Significance in their Contact
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
316
, pp.
97
121
.
25.
Pullen
,
J.
, and
Williamson
,
J. B. P.
,
1972
, “
On the Plastic Contact of Rough Surfaces
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
327
, pp.
159
173
.
26.
Nayak
,
P. R.
,
1973
, “
Random Process Model of Rough Surfaces in Plastic Contact
,”
Wear
,
26
, pp.
305
333
.
You do not currently have access to this content.