Some results of a research and development program for centrifugal compressors are presented. Six-stage configurations with low flow coefficient were tested. The stages had channel width parameter b2/D2 = 0.01 and 0.03. For each value of the width parameter, three different impellers with inlet hub to outlet diameter ratio do/D2 = 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 were designed. Test rig, instrumentation, and data analysis are described. Special attention was devoted to probe calibrations and to evaluation of the leakage, bearing, and disk friction losses. Aerodynamic performance of all tested stages is presented. Slip factors of impellers obtained experimentally and theoretically are compared. Losses in both vaneless diffuser and return channel with deswirl vanes are discussed. Rotating stall was also investigated. Criteria for stall limit were tested.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Compressors, Flow (Dynamics), Impellers, Bearings, Calibration, Disks, Friction, Industrial research, Instrumentation, Leakage, Probes, Vaneless diffusers
1.
Adler, D., 1980, “Status of Centrifugal Impeller Internal Aerodynamics. Part II: Experiments and Influence of Viscosity,” ASME Journal of Engineering for Power, Vol. 102, July.
2.
Benvenuti
E.
,
1972
, “
Research on Centrifugal Compressor Stages for Low Flow Coefficients
,”
Quaderni Pignone
, Vol.
15
, pp.
11
–
19
.
3.
Braembussche, R. V. D., 1982, “Rotating Stall in Vaneless Diffusers of Centrifugal Compressors,” VKI Technical Note 145.
4.
Casey, M. V., Dalbert, P., and Shurter, E., 1990, “Radial Compressor Stages for Low Flow Coefficients,” IMechE 1990, C403/004, pp. 117–126.
5.
Cyrus, V., and Sˇprinc, M., 1993, “Nonsteady Flow Investigation in Radial Compressor Stages With Very Low Flow Rate,” SVU´SS Int. Report [in Czech].
6.
Daily
J. W.
, and
Nece
R. E.
,
1960
, “
Chamber Dimension Effects on Induced Flow and Frictional Resistance of Enclosed Rotating Disks
,”
ASME Journal of Basic Engineering
, Vol.
82
, pp.
217
–
232
.
7.
Japikse
D.
,
1987
, “
A Critical Evaluation of Three Centrifugal Compressors With Pedigree Data Sets
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
109
, pp.
1
–
9
.
8.
Koizumi
T.
,
1983
, “
Experimental Studies on Performance of Centrifugal Compressors With Very Small Flow Coefficient
,”
Mitsui Zosen Technical Review
, Vol.
117
, pp.
28
–
39
[in Japanese].
9.
Nece
R. E.
, and
Daily
J. W.
,
1960
, “
Roughness Effects on Frictional Resistance of Enclosed Rotating Disks
,”
ASME Journal of Basic Engineering
, Vol.
82
, pp.
553
–
562
.
10.
Paroubek, J., Sˇtastny´, M., and Kra´l, K., 1989, “Aerodynamic Performance of Radial Compressor Stage With Very Low Flow Rate,” SVU´SS Int. Report [in Czech].
11.
Platt, M., 1981, “Computerized Compressor Design,” Turbomachinery International, May–June.
12.
Rodgers, C., 1978, “A Diffusion Factor Correlation for Centrifugal Impeller Stalling,” ASME Journal of Engineering for Power, Vol. 100.
13.
Senoo
Y.
, and
Kinoshita
Y.
,
1977
, “
Influence of Inlet Flow Conditions and Geometries of Centrifugal Vaneless Diffusers on Critical Flow Angles for Reverse Flow
,”
ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering
, Vol.
99
, pp.
98
–
103
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1995
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.