A computationally efficient time-accurate vortex method for unsteady incompressible flows through multiple blade row systems is presented. The method represents the boundary surfaces using vortex systems. A local coordinate system is assigned to each independently moving blade row. Blade shed vorticity is determined from two generating mechanisms and convected using the Euler equation. The first mechanism of vorticity generation is a potential mechanism from a nonlinear unsteady pressure-type Kutta condition applied at the blade trailing edges. The second mechanism is a viscous mechanism from a viscous wake vorticity (VWV) model implemented to simulate the viscous shear layers on the blade pressure and suction sides. Two different two-blade-row compressor systems, a rotor/stator (R/S) system and a stator/rotor (S/R) system, were used to investigate the interaction forces on each blade row. Computational results of the potential and viscous interaction forces are presented and compared to measurements. The comparison suggests that the viscous wake interaction accounts for 25–30% of the peak loading for an axial spacing of 10% chord length between the blade rows. The efficient computational method is particularly attractive for blade indexing study. Therefore a three-blade-row rotor/stator/rotor (R1/S/R2) compressor system is used to demonstrate the indexing calculations between the two rotor positions. Resultant forces on each blade row are presented for ten rotor indexing positions and three axial gap sizes for the gaps between R1 and S and between S and R2. The unsteady peak-to-peak force can reach 10–15% of inflow dynamic head for the gap spacing investigated. The minimum-to-maximum variation of the unsteady force can account for 40–50% of averaged unsteady force.

1.
Rai
,
M. M.
,
1987
, “
Navier-Stokes Simulations of Rotor/Stator Interaction Using Patched and Overlaid Grids
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
3
(
5
), pp.
387
396
.
2.
Rai, K. V., and Delaney, R. A., 1992, “Investigation of Unsteady Flow Through a Transonic Turbine Stage, Part I, Analysis,” AIAA Paper No. 90-2408.
3.
Giles
,
M.
, and
Haimes
,
R.
,
1993
, “
Validation of a Numerical Method for Unsteady Flow Calculation
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
, pp.
110
117
.
4.
Ho
,
Y. H.
, and
Lakshminarayana
,
B.
,
1996
, “
Computational Modeling of Three-Dimensional Flow Through a Turbine Rotor Cascade With Strong Secondary Flows
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
250
261
.
5.
Arnone
,
A.
, and
Pacciani
,
R.
,
1996
, “
Rotor-Stator Interaction Analysis Using the Navier-Stokes Equations and a Multigrid Method
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
679
689
.
6.
Goldstein
,
M. E.
, and
Atassi
,
H.
,
1976
, “
A Complete Second-Order Theory for the Unsteady Flow About an Aiorfoil due to Periodic Gust
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
74, Part 4
, pp.
741
765
.
7.
Goldstein
,
M. E.
,
1978
, “
Unsteady Vortical and Entropic Distortions of Potential Flows Round Arbitrary Obstacles
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
89, Part 3
, pp.
433
468
.
8.
Gallus
,
H. E.
,
Groillus
,
H.
, and
Lambertz
,
J.
,
1982
, “
The Influence of Blade Number Ratio and Blade Row Spacing on Axial-Flow Compressor Stator Dynamic Load and Stage Sound Pressure Level
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
104
, pp.
633
644
.
9.
Henderson
,
G.
, and
Fleeter
,
S.
,
1993
, “
Forcing Function Effects on Unsteady Aerodynamic Gust Response: Part 1—Forcing Function
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
, pp.
741
750
.
10.
Henderson
,
G.
, and
Fleeter
,
S.
,
1993
, “
Forcing Function Effects on Unsteady Aerodynamic Gust Response: Part 2—Low Solidity Airfoil Row Response
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
, pp.
751
761
.
11.
Feiereisen, J. M., Montgomery, M. D., and Fleeter, S., 1994, “Unsteady Aerodynamic Forcing Functions: A Comparison Between Linear Theory and Experiment,” ASME Paper 93-GT-141.
12.
Weaver, M. M., and Fleeter, S., 1994, “Turbine Rotor Generated Forcing Functions for Flow Induced Vibrations,” ASME Paper 94-GT-328.
13.
Manwaring
,
S. R.
, and
Wisler
,
D. C.
,
1993
, “
Unsteady Aerodynamics and Gust Response in Compressors and Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
, pp.
724
740
.
14.
Chung
,
M. H.
, and
Wo
,
A. M.
,
1997
, “
Navier-Stokes and Potential Calculations of Axial Spacing Effect on Vortical and Potential Disturbance and Gust Response in an Axial Compressor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
, pp.
472
481
.
15.
Valkov
,
T.
, and
Tan
,
C. S.
,
1995
, “
Control of The Unsteady Flow In A Stator Blade Row Interacting With Upstream Moving Wakes
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
117
, pp.
97
105
.
16.
Capece
,
V. R.
, and
Fleeter
,
S.
,
1989
, “
Experimental Investigation of Multistage Interaction Guest Aerodynamics
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
111
, pp.
409
417
.
17.
Hsu
,
S. T.
, and
Wo
,
A. M.
,
1998
, “
Reduction of Unsteady Blade Loading by Beneficial Use of Vortical and Potential Disturbances in an Axial Compressor with Rotor Clocking
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
120
, pp.
705
713
.
18.
Lee
,
Y. T.
,
Bein
,
T. W.
,
Feng
,
J.
, and
Merkle
,
C. L.
,
1993
, “
Unsteady Rotor Dynamics in Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
, pp.
85
93
.
19.
Lee, Y. T., Feng, J., and Merkle, C. L., 1994, “Time-Dependent Inviscid Flow Analysis of Rotor-Stator System,” Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Washington, DC.
20.
Raj
,
R.
, and
Lakshminarayana
,
B.
,
1973
, “
Characteristics of the Wake Behind a Cascade of Airfoils
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
61, Part 4
, pp.
707
730
.
You do not currently have access to this content.