A novel secondary flow feature, previously unreported for turbine blading as far as the authors are aware, has been discovered. It has been found that it is possible to separate part of the inlet boundary layer on the blade row end wall as it is being over-turned and rolled up into the passage vortex. This flow feature has been discovered during a continuing investigation into the aerodynamic effects of non-axisymmetric end wall profiling. Previous work, using the low speed linear cascade at Durham University, has shown the potential of end wall profiling for reducing secondary losses. The latest study, the results of which are described here, was undertaken to determine the limits of what end wall profiling can achieve. The flow has been investigated in detail with pressure probe traversing and surface flow visualization. This has found that the inlet boundary locally separates, on the early suction side of the passage, generating significant extra loss which feeds directly into the core of the passage vortex. The presence of this new feature gives rise to the unexpected result that the secondary flow, as determined by the exit flow angle deviations and levels of secondary kinetic energy, can be reduced while at the same time the loss is increased. CFD was found to calculate the secondary flows moderately well compared with measurements. However, CFD did not predict this new feature, nor the increase in loss it caused. It is concluded that the application of non-axisymmetric end wall profiling, although it has been shown to be highly beneficial, can give rise to adverse features that current CFD tools are unable to predict. Improvements to CFD capability are required in order to be able to avoid such features, and obtain the full potential of end wall profiling.

1.
Sieverding
,
C. H.
,
1985
, “
Recent Progress in the Understanding of Basic Aspects of Secondary Flows In Turbine Blade Passages
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
107
, pp.
248
252
.
2.
Langston
,
L. S.
,
2001
, “
Secondary Flows in Axial Turbines-a Review,” Heat and Mass Transfer in Gas Turbine Systems
,
Trenie Iznos
,
943
, pp.
11
26
.
3.
Harvey
,
N. W.
,
Rose
,
M. G.
,
Shahpar
,
S.
,
Taylor
,
M. D.
,
Hartland
,
J.
, and
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
,
2000
, “
Non-Axisymmetric Turbine End Wall Design: Part I Three-Dimensional Design System
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
, pp.
278
285
.
4.
Hartland
,
J.
,
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
,
Harvey
,
N. W.
, and
Rose
,
M. G.
,
2000
, “
Non-Axisymmetric End Wall Design: Part II Experimental Validation
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
, pp.
286
293
.
5.
Ingram, G. L., Gregory-Smith, D. G., Rose, M. G., Harvey, N. W., and Brennan, G., 2002, “The Effect of End-Wall Profiling on Secondary Flow and Loss Development in a Turbine Cascade,” ASME paper no. GT-2002-30339.
6.
Brennan, G., Harvey, N. W., Rose, M. G., Fomison, N., and Taylor, M. D., 2001, “Improving the Efficiency of the Trent 500 HP Turbine Using Non-Axisymmetric End Walls: Part 1 Turbine Design,” ASME paper no. 2001-GT-0444.
7.
Rose, M. G., Harvey, N. W., Seaman, P., Newman, D. A., and McManus, D., 2001, “Improving the Efficiency of the Trent 500 HP Turbine Using Non-Axisymmetric End Walls: Part 2: Experimental Validation,” ASME paper no. 2001-GT-0505.
8.
Harvey, N. W., Brennan, G., Newman, D. A., and Rose, M. G., 2002, “Improving Turbine Efficiency Using Non-Axisymmetric End walls: Validation in the Multi-Row Environment and with Low Aspect Ratio Blading,” ASME paper no. GT-2002-30337.
9.
Ingram, G., Gregory-Smith, D. G., and Harvey, N. W., 2003, “Quantification of the Benefits of End-Wall Profiling in a Turbine Cascade,” XVI International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE), AIAA paper no. AIAA-2003-1101.
10.
Moore, H., and Gregory-Smith, D. G., 1996, “Transition Effects on Secondary Flows in a Turbine Cascade,” ASME paper no. 96-GT-100.
11.
Zess
,
G. A.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
2002
, “
Computational Design and Experimental Evaluation of Using a Leading Edge Fillet on a Gas Turbine Vane
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
124
, pp.
167
175
.
12.
Sauer, H., Muller, R., and Vogeler, K., 2000, “Reduction of Secondary Flow Losses in Turbine Cascades by Leading Edge Modifications at the End-wall,” ASME paper no. 2000-GT-0473.
13.
Moore, J. G., 1985, “Calculation of 3D Flow without Numerical Mixing,” AGARD-LS-140, 3D Computation Techniques applied to Internal Flows in Propulsion Systems, pp. 8.1–8.15.
14.
Ingram, G. L., 2003, “End Wall Profiling for the Reduction of Secondary Flow in Turbines,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Durham.
15.
Moore, H., 1995, “Experiments in a Turbine Cascade for the Validation of Turbulence and Transition Models,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Durham.
You do not currently have access to this content.