Endwall losses significantly contribute to the overall losses in modern turbomachinery, especially when aerodynamic airfoil load and pressure ratios are increased. In turbines with shrouded airfoils a large portion of these losses are generated by the leakage flow across the shroud clearance. Generally the related losses can be grouped into losses of the leakage flow itself and losses caused by the interaction with the main flow in subsequent airfoil rows. In order to reduce the impact of the leakage flow and shroud design related losses a thorough understanding of the leakage losses and especially of the losses connected to enhancing secondary flows and other main flow interactions has to be understood. Therefore, a three stage LP turbine typical for jet engines is being investigated. For the three-stage test turbine 3D Navier-Stokes computations are performed simulating the turbine including the entire shroud cavity geometry in comparison with computations in the ideal flow path. Numerical results compare favorably against measurements carried out at the high altitude test facility at Stuttgart University. The differences of the simulations with and without shroud cavities are analyzed for several points of operation and a very detailed quantitative loss breakdown is presented.

1.
Egli
,
A.
, 1935, “
The Leakage of Steam Through Labyrinth Seals
,”
Trans. ASME
0097-6822,
57
, pp.
115
122
.
2.
Rhode
,
D. L.
,
Johnson
,
J. W.
, and
Broussard
,
D. H.
, 1996, “
Flow Visualization and Leakage Measurements of Steped Labyrinth Seals; Part I: Annular Groove
,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-136.
3.
Rhode
,
D. L.
,
Younger
,
J. S.
, and
Wernig
,
M. D.
, 1996, “
Flow Visualization and Leakage Measurements of Stepped Labyrinth Seals; Part II: Sloping Surfaces
,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-137.
4.
Takenaga
,
H.
,
Matsuda
,
T.
, and
Yokota
,
H.
, 1998, “
An Experimental Study on Labyrinth Seals for Steam Turbines
,”
Proceedings, 8th International Symposium on Flow Visualization
,
Sorrento
, Italy.
5.
Millward
,
J. A.
, and
Edwards
,
M. F.
, 1994, “
The Windage Heating of Air Passing through Labyrinth Seals
,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-56.
6.
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Johnson
,
C. G.
, 1976, “
An Experimental Study of the Tip Leakage Flow Around Shrouded Turbine Blades
,” CEGB Research Report CEGB-R/M/N848.
7.
Pfau
,
A.
,
Treiber
,
M.
,
Sell
,
M.
, and
Gyarmathy
,
G.
, 2000, “
Flow Interaction From the Exit Cavity of an Axial Turbine Blade Row Labyrinth Seal
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-481.
8.
Peters
,
P.
,
Breisig
,
V.
,
Giboni
,
A.
,
Lerner
,
Ch.
, and
Pfost
,
H.
, 2000, “
The Influence of the Clearance of Shrouded Rotor Blades on the Development of the Flowfield and Losses in the Subsequent Stator
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-478.
9.
Anker
,
J. E.
, and
Mayer
,
J. F.
, 2002, “
Simulation of the Interaction of Labyrinth Seal Leakage Flow and Main Flow in an Axial Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2002-30348.
10.
Korschunov
,
B. A.
, and
Döhler
,
S. W.
, 1996, “
Einfluß von Leckageströmungen an der Laufradspitze auf die Aerodynamischen Charakteristiken des Folgenden Leitgitters
,” BWK Bd.
48
, pp.
49
55
.
11.
Hunter
,
S. D.
, and
Manwaring
,
S. R.
, 2000, “
Endwall Cavity Flow Effects on Gaspath Aerodynamics in an Axial Flow Turbine: Part I—Experimental and Numerical Investigation
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-651.
12.
Hunter
,
S. D.
, and
Manwaring
,
S. R.
, 2000, “
Endwall Cavity Flow Effects on Gaspath Aerodynamics in an Axial Flow Turbine: Part II—Source Term Model Development
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-513.
13.
Traupel
,
W.
, 1966,
Thermische Strömungsmaschinen
,
Springer-Verlag
, Berlin.
14.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-435.
15.
Wallis
,
A. M.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Demargne
,
A. A. J.
, 2000, “
The Control of Shroud Leakage Flows to Reduce Aerodynamic Losses in a Low Aspect Ratio, Shrouded Axial Flow Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-475.
16.
McLean
,
Ch.
,
Camci
,
C.
, and
Glezer
,
B.
, 2001, “
Mainstream Aerodynamic Effects Due to Wheelspace Coolant Injection in a High-Pressure Turbine Stage: Part I: Aerodynamic Measurements in the Stationary Frame
,”
J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
123
, pp.
687
696
.
17.
McLean
,
Ch.
,
Camci
,
C.
, and
Glezer
,
B.
, 2001, “
Mainstream Aerodynamic Effects Due to Wheelspace Coolant Injection in a High-Pressure Turbine Stage: Part II: Aerodynamic Measurements in the Rotational Frame
,”
J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
123
, pp.
697
703
.
18.
Girgis
,
S.
,
Vlasic
,
E.
,
Lavole
,
J.-P.
, and
Moustapha
,
S. H.
, 2002, “
The Effect of Secondary Air Injection on the Performance of a Transonic Turbine Stage
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2002-30340.
19.
Wellborn
,
S. R.
, and
Okiishi
,
T. H.
, 1999, “
The Influence of Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows on Multistage Compressor Performance
,”
J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
122
, pp.
486
498
.
20.
Demargne
,
A. A. J.
, and
Longley
,
J. P.
, 2000, “
The Aerodynamic Interaction of Stator Shroud Leakage and Mainstream Flows in Compressors
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-570.
21.
Wellborn
,
S. R.
, 2001, “
Details of Axial-Compressor Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-495.
22.
Fritsch
,
G.
,
Hoeger
,
M.
,
Blaha
,
C.
, and
Bauer
,
D.
, 1997, “
Viscous 3D Compressor Simulations on Parallel Architectures
,”
AIAA Paper No. 97-2876
.
23.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
, 1988, “
Reassessment of the Scale Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
25
, No.
11
, pp.
1299
1310
.
24.
Gier
,
J.
,
Ardey
,
S.
, and
Heisler
,
A.
, 2000, “
Analysis of Complex Three-Dimensional Flow in a Three-Stage LP Turbine by Means of Transitional Navier-Stokes Simulation
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-645.
25.
Abu-Ghannam
,
B. J.
, and
Shaw
,
R.
, 1980, “
Natural Transition of Boundary Layers—The Effects of Turbulence, Pressure Gradient and Flow History
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0022-2542,
22
, No.
5
, pp.
213
228
.
26.
Drela
,
M.
, 1995,
Implementation of Modified Abu-Ghannam/Shaw Transition Criterion
,
MIT Aero-Astro
, Cambridge, MA.
27.
Gier
,
J.
, and
Ardey
,
S.
, 2001, “
On the Impact of Blade Count Reduction on Aerodynamic Performance and Loss Generation in a Three-Stage LP Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-197.
You do not currently have access to this content.