This paper presents measured frequency dependent stiffness and damping coefficients for 12-bladed and 8-bladed pocket damper seals (PDS) subdivided into four different seal configurations. Rotating experimental tests are presented for inlet pressures at 69 bar (1000 psi), a frequency excitation range of 20–300 Hz, and rotor speeds up to 20,200 rpm. The testing method used to determine direct and cross-coupled force coefficients was the mechanical impedance method, which required the measurement of external shaker forces, system accelerations, and motion in two orthogonal directions. In addition to the impedance measurements, dynamic pressure responses were measured for individual seal cavities of the eight-bladed PDS. Results of the frequency dependent force coefficients for the four PDS designs are compared. The conclusions of the tests show that the eight-bladed PDS possessed significantly more positive direct damping and negative direct stiffness than the 12-bladed seal. The results from the dynamic pressure response tests show that the diverging clearance design strongly influences the dynamic pressure phase and force density of the seal cavities. The tests also revealed the measurement of same-sign cross-coupled (cross-axis) stiffness coefficients for all seals, which indicate that the seals do not produce a destabilizing influence on rotor-bearing systems.

1.
Childs
,
D. W.
, 1993,
Turbomachinery Rotordynamics
,
John Wiley and Sons
, New York.
2.
Vance
,
J. M.
, and
Schultz
, 1993, “
A New Damper Seal for Turbomachinery
,”
Vibration of Rotating Systems
,
ASME
,
New York
, DE-Vol.
60
, pp.
139
148
.
3.
Li
,
J.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
, 1995, “
Effects of Clearance and Clearance Ratio on Two and Three Bladed TAMSEALS, TRC-Seal-4-95
,” Turbomachinery Laboratory Research Progress Report,
Texas A&M University
, College Station.
4.
Ransom
,
D.
,
Li
,
J.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
, 1998, “
Experimental Force Coefficients for a Two-Bladed Labyrinth Seal and a Four Pocket Damper Seal
,”
J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
28
, pp.
98
109
.
5.
Laos
,
H. E.
, 1999, “
Rotordynamic Effect of Pocket Damper Seals
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
6.
Li
,
J.
,
Aguilar
,
R.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
, 2000, “
Dynamic Force Coefficients of a Multiple Blade, Multiple-Pocket Gas Damper Seal: Test Results and Predictions
,”
J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
122
, pp.
317
322
.
7.
Vance
,
J. M.
,
Sharma
,
A.
, and
Jayakar
,
N.
, 2002, “
Effect of Frequency and Design Parameters on Pocket Damper Seal Performance
,”
Proceedings of Fluid Structure Interactions
, New Orleans, LA,
ASME
,
New York
, No. 23, pp.
208
217
.
8.
Childs
,
D. W.
, and
Hale
,
K.
, 1994, “
A Test Apparatus and Facility to Identify the Rotordynamic Coefficients of High Speed Hydrostatic Bearings
,”
J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
116
, pp.
337
334
.
9.
Dawson
,
M.
, 2000, “
A Comparison of the Static and Dynamic Characteristics of Straight-Bore and Convergent Tapered-Bore Honeycomb Annular Gas Seals
,” M. S. thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
10.
Sprowl
,
T. B.
, and
Childs
,
D. W.
, “
A Study of the Effects of Inlet Preswirl on the Dynamic Coefficients of a Straight-Bore Honeycomb Gas Damper Seal
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53328.
11.
Ertas
,
B.
, and
Vance
,
J.
, “
The Influence of Same Sign Cross-Coupled Stiffness on Rotordynamics
,” ASME Paper No. DETC2005-84873.
12.
Gamal
,
A.
, 2003, “
Analytical and Experimental Evaluation of the Leakage and Stiffness Characteristics of High Pressure Pocket Damper Seals
,” M.S. thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
13.
Ertas
,
B.
, 2005, “
Rotordynamic Force Coefficients of Pocket Damper Seals
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
14.
Lucas
,
M. J.
,
Noreen
,
R. A.
,
Sutherland
,
L. C.
,
Cole
,
J. E.
, and
Junger
,
M. C.
, 1997,
Handbook of the Characteristics of Turbomachinery Cavities
,
ASME
, New York.
You do not currently have access to this content.