This paper investigates a coherence approach for locating structural damage using modal frequencies and transfer function parameters identified from input-output data using Observer/Kalman filter identification (OKID). Autonomous damage identification using such forward methods generally require (i) a structural model by which to relate measured and predicted modal properties induced by damage, and (ii) good sensitivity of modal parameter changes to damage states. Using the coherence approach, a damage parameter vector comprised of a finite set of modal frequencies and transfer function parameters is hypothesized for each damage case using either identified or analytic structural models. Measured parameter vectors are extracted from experimental input-output data for a damaged structure using OKID and are compared to hypotheses to determine the most likely damage state. The richness of the parameter vector set, which is comprised of high-quality frequency measurements and lower-quality transfer function parameters, is evaluated in order to determine the ability to uniquely localize damage. The method is evaluated experimentally using a three-degree-of-freedom torsional system and a space-frame truss. Damage parameter hypotheses are generated from a model of the healthy structure developed by system identification in the torsional system, and an analytic model is used to generate damage hypotheses for the truss structure. Feedback control laws enhance the parameter vectors by including closed-loop modal frequencies in order to reduce noise sensitivity and improve uniqueness of parameter vector hypotheses to each damage case. Results show improvements in damage identification using damage parameter vectors comprised of open- and closed-loop modal frequencies, even when model error exists in structural models used to form damage parameter vector hypotheses.

1.
Doebling
,
S. W.
,
Farrar
,
C. R.
,
Prime
,
M. B.
, and
Shevitz
,
D. W.
, 1996, “
Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems From Changes in Their Vibrational Characteristics: A Literature Review
,” Technical Report LA-13070-MS,
Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, NM.
2.
Swamidas
,
A. J. S.
, and
Chen
,
Y.
, 1995, “
Monitoring Crack Growth Through Change of Modal Parameters
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
186
(
2
), pp.
325
343
.
3.
Cawley
,
P.
, and
Adams
,
R. D.
, 1979, “
The Location of Defects in Structures From Measurements of Natural Frequencies
,”
J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des.
0309-3247,
14
(
2
), pp.
49
57
.
4.
Armon
,
D.
,
Ben-Haim
,
Y.
, and
Braun
,
S.
, 1994, “
Crack Detection in Beams by Rank-Ordering of Eigenfrequency Shifts
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
0888-3270,
8
(
1
), pp.
81
91
.
5.
Friswell
,
M. I.
, and
Penny
,
J. E. T.
, 1997, “
The Practical Limits of Damage Detection and Location Using Vibration Data
,”
Proc. 11th VPI&SU Symposium on Structural Dynamics and Control
, Blacksburg, VA,
VPI&SU
,
Blacksburg, VA
, pp.
31
40
.
6.
Banks
,
H. T.
,
Inman
,
D. J.
,
Leo
,
D. J.
, and
Wang
,
Y.
, 1996, “
An Experimentally Validated Damage Detection Theory in Smart Structures
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
191
(
5
), pp.
859
880
.
7.
Lew
,
J.-S.
, 1995, “
Using Transfer Function Parameter Changes for Damage Detection of Structures
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
33
(
11
), pp.
2189
2193
.
8.
Ray
,
L. R.
, and
Tian
,
L.
, 1999, “
Damage Detection in Smart Structures Through Sensitivity Enhancing Feedback Control
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
227
(
5
), pp.
987
1002
.
9.
Ray
,
L. R.
, and
Koh
,
B.-H.
, 2000, “
Integration of Autonomous Fatigue Crack Detection and Vibration Control in Smart Plates
,”
Proc. SPIE Smart Structures and Materials Conference
, Newport Beach, CA,
V. V.
Varadan
, ed.,
SPIE
,
Bellingham, WA
, Vol.
3985
.
10.
Ray
,
L. R.
, and
Marini
,
S.
, 2000, “
Optimization of Control Laws for Damage Detection in Smart Structures
,”
Proc. SPIE Smart Structures and Materials Conference
,
V. V.
Varadan
, ed., Newport Beach, CA,
SPIE
,
Bellingham, WA
, Vol.
3985
.
11.
Juang
,
J.-N.
, and
Pappa
,
R. S.
, 1985, “
An Eigensystem Realization Algorithm for Model Parameter Identification and Model Reduction
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
0731-5090,
8
(
5
), pp.
620
627
.
12.
Parks
,
T. R.
, 1999,
Manual for Model 205/205a: Torsional Control System (Instructor’s Edition)
,
Educational Control Products
,
Woodland Hills, CA
.
13.
Solbeck
,
J. A.
, 2004, “
Damage Identification Using Sensitivity-Enhancing Control with an Identified Model
,” Ph.D. thesis, Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.
14.
Alvin
,
K. F.
, and
Park
,
K. C.
, 1994, “
Second-Order Structural Identification Procedure via State-Space Based System Identification
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
32
, pp.
397
406
.
15.
Phan
,
M. Q.
, and
Longman
,
R. W.
, 2004, “
Extracting Mass, Stiffness, and Damping Matrices of Mechanical Systems from Identified State-Space Models
,”
Proc. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference
, Providence, AIAA, Washington, DC.
16.
Koh
,
B.-H.
, 2003, “
Damage Identification in Smart Structures Through Sensitivity Enhancing Control
,” Ph.D. thesis, Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.
17.
Koh
,
B.-H.
, and
Ray
,
L. R.
, 2003, “
Localization of Damage in Smart Structures Through Sensitivity Enhancing Control
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
0888-3270,
17
(
4
), pp.
837
855
.
18.
Nalitolela
,
N. G.
,
Penny
,
J. E. T.
, and
Friswell
,
M. I.
, 1992, “
A Mass or Stiffness Addition Technique for Structural Parameter Updating
,”
Int. J. Anal. Exp. Modal Anal.
0886-9367,
7
(
3
), pp.
157
168
.
19.
Cha
,
P. D.
, and
Gu
,
W.
, 2000, “
Model Updating Using an Incomplete Set of Experimental Modes
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
233
(
4
), pp.
587
600
.
20.
Lew
,
J.-S.
, and
Juang
,
J.-N.
, 2002, “
Structural Damage Detection Using Virtual Passive Controllers
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
0731-5090,
25
(
3
), pp.
419
424
.
21.
Meroform Modular Systems: System and Function—M12 System. Component Catalog, 2003, MERO GmbH & Co. KG, Exhibit Systems, Wurzburg, Germany.
You do not currently have access to this content.